07.03.2026 22:12
👍 3
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
I look forward to the day when his attorneys are desperately trying to get this confession (& many others) excluded from evidence in his criminal trial.
“Me speak ’Murican. Unga!”
Has this troglodyte ever read anything his nominally beloved founding generation wrote? Nah, too woke & sissy.
Hee hee. 🤭🤭🤭You said beat.🤭🤭🤭
(Sorry, that was the inner 5th-grader speaking.)
Coincidentally, I have an idea for the interior decorating of the new Versailles on the Potomac “ballroom.”
Has Mace provided her definition?
Hint: It’s the GOP definition of a woman:
“A life-support system for a uterus owned by the state.”
Yes, that is *exactly* what it is.
www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-...
And festooning your skin with tattoos that look like they were picked out by Anders Brevik.
"Arbitrary and capricious."
It was more gory than a snuff film.
Hmm, funny she should mention this on p.14:
“Federal courts may exercise their supervisory powers to remedy violations of recognized rights, to protect the integrity of the federal courts, and to deter illegal conduct by government officials.”
The 11th Circuit might want to do exactly that.
Some legal history: Minors do have 1st Amendment rights. The canonical case is Tinker v. Des Moines (1969) (holding that high-school kids had a right to wear black arm bands with peace symbols to protest the Vietnam War).
Persona non grata.
“Pokes fun”??? Ha ha ha, 1 million dead, ha ha ha. Sick.
“That’s why I was able to defraud the federal government for so long.”
GOP “meritocracy.”
Little Marvin.
Argle-bargle!
Fake news. His prison number would be 11780.
😉😉😉
And, given what happened to Charles I,🪓🪓🪓 Andrew is probably not comforted by this comparison.
Any day now ....
Hands are too big.
Thank gosh someone is trying to avert the looming extinction of plants.
We would be much better off with the thoughtful prudence of President Camacho (even though he did have the same Cabinet).
