WC32 been pretty much settled for quite some time.
With 5 fts it looks like Stach for Le Fee is on the cards in 30 to strengthen 31 a bit.
Tete for Timber in 31, and hopefully 5 fts after the WC
*the reason for the change is simply because I'm in a groupchat with a person I KNOW gets City-info.
He showed his fpl-team where Haaland was the captain, so would be silly to go against it.
(Allthough he didnt say if he got the info Haaland is starting or not)
Changing from Bruno to Haaland-cap
GW 29
4 -> 5 fts
Went Bruno instead of Ekitike as captain. Bigger margin than expected on Review, so who am I to disagree, right?
Dont fancy Haaland because fear of cameo if bench
OR: 90k
Good luck!
Pretty well set for midweek.
Gonna roll from 4 to 5 fts.
Need confirmation that Haaland is out for several gws, I think, for me to act on the injury.
Review wants Salah, but thats a pretty big fat NO from me.
I think Ekitike over Bruno as cpt.
Haaland ofc if he's confirmed fit
GW28
2/5 fts used:
Lacroix and Tolu ->
Gudmundsson and Thiago
Decided against Dango/Wilson.
Just gut feeling, I guess. Close on review.
OR: 115k
Good luck!
Launched early this morning.
I agree, not much hype
Feels like a small, but annoying rollercoaster ride.
Getting Gabriel too late.
Selling VVD.
Buying Timber instead of Rice.
Marginal decisions gone wrong.
Oh well. Process is pretty good, according to review.
Gonna do some transfers ahead of gw28.
Tolu is almost certainly gonna be Thiago.
For that I need cash.
Enzo to Tavernier is a possibility, but could be a week too early for the latter.
Enzo to Dango or Wilson needs another cashcow.
Probably Lacroix to Van den Berg or something
Bench Lacroix for Mukiele.
Haaland captain
GW 27
4 -> 5 fts
OR: 90k
(Might change captain to Haaland)
Good luck!
GW 26
1/4 fts:
Kroupi -> Tolu
TC Gabriel
OR: 50k
Good luck!
Thats an impossible one imo!
Gut feeling says not to bench Tarkowski. Worth nothing though 😊
From 200k to 50k in two weeks!
Terrific!
Szobo-red gives me an opportunity to have some fun with Wolves.
Kroupi -> Tolu is backed by review, so that'll probably be my move
GW 25
2/5 fts:
Keane and Saka ->
Timber and Mbeumo
OR: 80k
Good luck!
Really torn on what to do here.
Timber was the obvious one, but not easy to buy after the training-info.
If I dont buy Timber now, I think its best to roll and decide which third Arsenal-spot in gw26
Saka -> Mbeumo tonight then (probabaly)
Om du har et publikum, og tenker dette var viktig/interessant kan du få skjermbildet av meg, og lage en egen post om du vil
Kom litt sent denne.
Jeg var jo i utgangspunktet enig med deg, så da får du gå etter han/dem som mente den burde slettes 😉
Jeg sletter.
Kommentarene i etterkant er sikkert nok til å sette fokus på det jeg tenkte kunne være en lærdom for flere
Du mener det er såpass ja.
Usikker på om jeg er enig i en så svart/hvitt-holdning.
(Da mener jeg svart/hvit som i at posten har blitt kraftig dementert i kommentarfeltet, og at da kan det ha (min mening) en verdi i et læringsøyemed)
Men jeg er tilbøyelig til å endre mening, og slette altså
Hehe, synes du jeg burde slette hele posten?
Holder kanskje at den ga meg en oppvekker
Er det noen gang kildekritikk er aktuelt, så er det nå, skulle en tro.
Balansegangen mellom å være for kritisk og ta alt for god fisk er interessant, synes jeg i hvert fall.
Men også et poeng i at slike poster kan være uheldige ja. Enig i det
Nei, kan hende det burde slettes.
Tenkte bare folk på Bluesky var oppegående nok til å kunne ta samme lærdom som meg.
Tror ikke det er "common knowledge" at AI kan bomme såpass, men her er det fullt mulig jeg kan ta feil altså.
Pluss hvorfor skal folk lese det JEG har postet og ta d for god fisk?
Hvitvaske Jagland var det siste jeg ville, men skjønner at det kunne tolkes dithen
Takker!
Ble en test av min egen kildekritikk ja
Ja, den har rotet en del her.
Har lagt meg flat andre steder i tråden 🛌
Synes den er et fint hjelpemiddel til mye, men kommer åpenbart ofte til kort også
Skjønner. Min tiltro til den bør jekkes ned noen hakk mao
