Sqeaky

Well, then... I misread, it doesn't work.

If you want all the lands in one fell swoop, either get something with a landfall trigger that makes a token, or get something that makes all lands creatures. Nature's Revolt means that when you search for a forest or plains, it is a creature, so you immediately can search for the forest or plains.

Armageddon {3}{W} • Sorcery • Destroy all lands. • Masters 25 (A25) #5 • Illustrated by Chris Rahn • Magic: The Gathering, MTG

You said tournament, Friendly is off the table.

Blow up their land and replace my own; scryfall.com/card/a25/5/a...

The get all lands at once while making threats: scryfall.com/card/7ed/260... or
scryfall.com/card/eoc/104...

And tons of mana dorks: scryfall.com/card/mh3/286...

Also, for reference, I speak with some authority and have worked in defense in the United States before. Right after an event happens, there's always this kind of misinformation. Any sort of analysis that is just "X is larger than Y, therefore specific outcome" is always wrong. Look at Ukraine.

A problem with source fishing, we can't just pick and choose ones we like. We need to find ones that are saying verifiable stuff, citing sources, explaining why they believe what they believe, and doing other high quality things sources do. These don't pop up overnight.

Perun is a baseline.

We produce a lot more than 7 interceptors a month. I suspect we produce 7 of our most high-end ballistic missile interceptors. And, if we need to, we will build more interceptor factories. We will also attack their missile production facilities.

I'm not saying this war in Iran was a good idea. It's a bad idea. But it's not a bad idea to the scale of a collapse US dollars or killing everyone in the Gulf Coast countries.

For someone talking about game theory, he's ignoring that people can respond to responses. It is shitty and complex.

I have no problem with the accent. He speaks perfectly fine English. He's just using English to say untrue things.

I'm not saying that starting a war in Iran was a good idea, but it's not going to collapse the US dollar entirely. It's not going to be good for the US dollar. But this guy is speaking with such hyperbole and so wrong on basics that I can't take him seriously.

He's also just saying things that aren't true. He is saying that it's impossible to defend USmilitary bases in the GCC from missiles and drones, but we can intercept missiles drones, and we can blow up their missile/drone production capacity.

I will finish watching because on this first video he claimed that the USwould likely attack Iran, but that was also a very different sort of video. That was a college professor carefully couching what they're saying and talking about possibilities.

This is someone just doomespeaking for clicks.

This guy might have started off as a credible source two years ago when his first videos were just reporting of classroom talks, but I wouldn't count this video as a high quality source by itself. He has a lot of the same rhetorical tricks as people like Alex Jones, but he seems more well-informed.

I'm trying to watch this and I'm about a third of the way through and it's really hard to watch. This guy started off as a professor, but he's become full-on fear mongering YouTuber. He's claiming that closing the Strait of Hormuz will collapse the United States. That is more than a hyperbolic.

I don't specifically disagree with you, but I am curious to hear more about your thought process. Why can't we play along with this? Is Iran somehow the outside force that might act on this administration? I discounted them because their military is largely ineffectual outside of regional conflicts.

And when I say there is no bottom, I mean we can keep getting worse and worse and worse and until acted upon by an outside force (to the admin), we can just dig infinitely deep.

There is no bottom to human depravity.

Not 9/11 and the abuse of the AUMF? Not Citizens United and the open corruption it empowers? Not Jan 6 and the systematic defeat of the rule of law? Not the re-election of Donald Trump? Not a million other things that couldn't happen in a functional country.

I don't like it, but there is no bottom.

Hey picture of Loki the Cat, his eyes large as he stares up at the photographer. He is just standing there kind goggle eyed, here's the typical collaboration of a Siamese cat, black feet, black face, gently transitioning to brown and beige on his body.

Loki just sort of being derpy.

Can you show me a time where peace worked when deployed by someone with no leverage against someone with lots of leverage and no empathy, and it worked? Violence creates a fundamental sort of leverage and other problems.

How has Trump not demonstrated this clearly enough? He is willing to ignore everything but violence, and he is committing violence himself. Even peaceful elections and impeachment are backed by the state monopoly on violence. If he's impeached and doesn't leave, do you think the military won't act?

Power was presented a choice. They were given demands from the peaceful sides of the protests, and they were presented violent, ready to rampage mobs on the other side. They were literally threatened into choosing civil rights in both cases. There cannot be peace without capacity for war. 2/2

If there is no threat of violence, then yes, they can kill tens of millions of Americans. They killed 6 million Jews during WWII because the Jewish population didn't have a credible source of violence. Martin Luther King and Gandhi both had violent counterparts. 1/2

Absolutely. And this whole debate stemmd from a notion that pure pacifism is not ideal; sometimes violence is required to stop harmful aggressors.

Thoughts?
#philosophy

Anyone who is unwilling to say "Fuck ICE" can't be my friend. If they're unwilling to say that we should get rid of foundational intolerance, then they support oppression or killing of my other friends.

Well, you should because clearly not all lies are the same. Calling it a "sliding scale" doesn't make the binary thinking any less dumb.

Yet somehow lies still coming in gradients. Democrats lie about health care to serve billionaires. Republicans lie about not being fascist, hurting minorities, and tearing down the country purely to serve billionaires. Saying that they all do it without context serves only the worst liars.

This aged well. Note the author.

Fuck ICE

I cannot tell the difference between your legitimate need and a scammer. Please do not use my name for this kind activity.

Everyone please donate to vetted charities. Help Gaza and everyone suffering in a way where you can prove scammers aren't diverting your donations.