Of course he is! He's working for Putin, he needs to weaken the U.S., it's literally his job description.
@skyyks
Sky before BlueSky, she/her. Actress/singer till pandemic hit; now a hermit. Queer polyglot, poet, educator, cat companion & islander. Atheist. Anti-fascist Anti-capitalist Anti-Covid. Pro-Democracy European.πͺπΊβοΈ I Stand with Ukraine & Palestine. π π©π»βπ€πππβπ»π©π»βπ«πποΈοΈ
Of course he is! He's working for Putin, he needs to weaken the U.S., it's literally his job description.
Keep defending Nazis. π π π You're just proving why your country's in the state it's in. It's not just Trump. The rot runs deep.
Forget that. We need you to skip to the part of the human piΓ±ata.
Those arguments are illogical, dishonest, or both. If flouting of the law meant nΓ©gation of the law then the law would not exist at all, which creates a paradox and is there lies the illogical fault. I'm really done now.
That's not true. Stop putting words into my mouth. I never said that. Moreover, claiming that a state has violated law does not negate that law, just as much as ignorance of it does not.
I'm not interested in devil's advocate takes. I said I'm done.
That's fascinating! Thank you so much for sharing that precious story about your grandmother! π₯Ή I had no idea that is how you say 'thank you' in Latin but in my language it's 'grazzi' so I understood it! π
Exactly that's what I'm saying. He is not really a conscientious objector. He's mocking and degrading the very concept by saying it's because he's a rapist.
The dismissal and minimising of literal war crimes is beyond disturbing. I'm done here.
No, a legal framework is a legal framework. It is in no way responsible for the ignorance of anybody. Like I said, ignorance of the law is not an excuse and this is an established legal principle!
This disdain and disregard for the law is exactly why your country is in the state it's in right now.
The Constitution hasn't mattered is simply untrue. The Constitution is the highest form of law. You swear an oath to the Constitution, you cannot say it 'doesn't matter'.
Oh! Thank you Joanne! π
I need to learn more about this.
I have to ask, what language is that?! π€©
Why? Do you understand what the 'suing' means?
Semi-sentient at a stretch.
It is all men, but US soldiers are professional rapists.
Let's make him famous. Name?
Not by the U.S. at any rate. Democratic countries will do the job.
Yes we need to make him famous. Does anyone have names?
He's a rapist. What fucking courage??
Watch the whole clip. He wasn't serious. He's a rapist and a racist.
Surely they would have been aware of that upon joining though.
Of course, I just don't understand that post because it's implying political ideology is irrelevant if someone tries to justify the bombing of kids. I'd argue it's relevant as the person saying this is probably doing so because of their ideology.
Autism is linked with EDS?
There's the law though, aside from personal ethical boundaries. The legal framework ensures that armed forces must disobey illegal orders.
So you're saying that the U.S. military has never followed the U.S. Constitution?
The article does not mention anyone suing.
And what does 'forgiveness' have to do with criminality anyway? Why are you justifying war crimes?