Dude was shot in the jugular. "Critical" just means "We're not calling it until we're in a hospital."
10.09.2025 19:53
👍 26
🔁 1
💬 2
📌 0
Dude was shot in the jugular. "Critical" just means "We're not calling it until we're in a hospital."
Hey Google, what country had literal boots-on-ground, in-country support for Pol Pot in 1979 because they were invading Vietnam?
Hey google, what was happening in Cambodia in 1979?
>said unironically with a hamsic in name
If you need a mask to enforce the law, you don’t deserve a badge.
Federal agents are snatching people off the streets—faces covered, names hidden.
This isn’t safety. It’s secrecy.
It’s not America.
adamkinzinger.substack.com/p/why-are-fe...
DISCORD ABSOLUTELY GET FUCKED I HOPE YOU ROT IN HELL domoai.app/blog/domoai-...
How to identify a Russian propaganda agent of influence – someone who consciously or unconsciously promotes narratives beneficial to the Kremlin?
What roles do they play in society? What are their key messages? And most importantly, what do they always leave out? Guideline:🧵
Tagging @ducugavril.nafoforum.org
@saltydogfella.bsky.social
And @machpiyal.bsky.social
Request you to support 🫡💙💛
I really can't be overstated just how immensely valuable this kind of database is for consistent, accurate identification of equipment.
The team behind it all, @joedyke.bsky.social , Joe Emmett and N. R. Jenzen-Jones, will be talking through their new 3D interactive models that are helping users identify some of the most widely used munitions. Listen in live to ask your questions! osmp.ngo/collection/s...
[Abruptly stops hula hooping] Not guilty, your Honor.
Immigration has positive macro effects, but negative PERSONALLY VISIBLE effects.
Is it 2028 yet?
Then no.
It's kind of amazing how the Army trying to electrify more of its vehicles is seen as some sort of woke DoD agenda and not what it really is: attempts at massive cost and maintenance saving with the added benefit of stealth (reduced noise & IR signature) in the battlefield.
"Climate has nothing to do with the DoD and readiness"
>the DoD almost lost F-22s to worsening hurricane seasons and had to shift entire squadrons farther away
You best believe in climate change because climate change believes in wrecking your equipment and turning your bases unusable.
Ballin.
BREAKING | Trump’s latest executive order designates English as the official language of the United States
everyone: if youre accused of rape and human trafficking youre welcome in the republican party (derogatory)
republicans: if youre accused of rape and human trafficking youre welcome in the republican party (complimentary)
First of many, but here we have a completely manufactured criminal investigation. One career prosecutor already resigned over it. Goal is simply to claw back $20 billion in Biden era climate money. Open and shut corruption. www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/202...
Fella - ONLY YOU CAN PREVENT FASCIST LIARS NATIONAL BONK SERVICE
It's FRIDAY! Follow A Fella #NAFO
Join us, @fellarequests.bsky.social, Resist and fight for Freedom! #Meme and support @altnps.bsky.social
The best way to confront a bully about the misinformation he is spreading is to confront him in front of everyone. Macron just did that.
PLEASE: Watch what happened in Coeur d'Alene Idaho today. This is fascism. Unmarked cops. 1A violations. RESIST.
📌Our Park Service Rangers have flagged the warning on El Capitan.
We are under threat by an America-attacking felon.
Reminder that Hesgeth's memoir recounts him *openly and proudly* disregarding lawful orders to follow rules of engagement.
LMAO OPM RESPONDED TO THIS A FEW WEEKS AGO, I DIDN'T BOTHER CHECKING
DOGE’s expenses have risen above 40 million, with weekly costs now exceeding 10 million. We will release an updated DOGE staff list soon.
The determination of whether or not an order is lawful is, by definition, a government employee interpreting the law.
This EO says it is *literally illegal* for service members to refuse unlawful orders, because only the President and AG can define what's lawful.
Except from Executive Order, stating that "For the purposes of this order, the term 'employees' shall have the meaning given that term in Section 2015 of Title 5, United States Code."
Excerpt from 5 USC 2015, which defines "a member of the uniformed service" as a federal employee.
Well, "employee" is defined using the definition in 5 USC 2015.
Which specifies that uniformed military members are "employees."
