One thing that is fairly clear at this point is that the entire point of whisking people out of the country with no due process in defiance of a judge's orders to put them into a foreign gulag *was so they could produce fascist content*.
One thing that is fairly clear at this point is that the entire point of whisking people out of the country with no due process in defiance of a judge's orders to put them into a foreign gulag *was so they could produce fascist content*.
As someone who spends a lot time thinking about the values I want to teach my kid (besides PLEASE DONβT EAT DIRT), the thing I keep coming back to is this: I want him to believe that the strongest, bravest thing he can do is give a shit about other peopleβespecially ones who arenβt like him at all.
american masculinity is so amazing. caring about clothes as a man apparently makes you "gay" but our position on geopolitics totally depends on whether you wear a suit
the whole 2020-2024 era of βdems shouldnt aggressively use the levers of power bc then republicans will do the same thing when theyre electedβ sure looks dumb as dog shit right now huh
Fun update on this, I offloaded the app off my phone so I canβt redownload it and when I tried to login to my account on my computer I could not figure out the password so I got off anyway lmao
*watches Canada win in OT as an American*
New:
DOGE's spending has been secret.
No longer.
My colleagues have uncovered it.
www.propublica.org/article/doge...
you (tiny, small of brain): this fantasy setting is unrealistic because women have rights
me (large): this fantasy setting is unrealistic because it treats the military as a coherent professional organization with low social status
The math was not mathing but we have solved the issue by turning the fan off
Me: why is it so cold in my apartment?
Also me: *has the ceiling fan in my room on high at all times*
If Elon or Mr beast buy TikTok Iβm getting off trust
Consolidated donation item requests for people displaced by the Allerton apartments fire in the Bronx:
Los Angeles Times + @Latimes Follow Rents likely to balloon in wake of L.A. wildfires, experts say
Now this, this is looting. Ainβt nobody gonna be arrested for it either.
Something that says a lot about me, I am pretty sure I am the only relative that has my cousins soon to be ex husband blocked!!!
Strategy might just be one of my favorite twice songs everβ¦itβs so fun and the Megan feature is just π§π»βπ³π
anyway i have a final exam in my metadata class on sunday and i fear it!
it be one dumbass me telling myself exaaaaactly
On November 20th, Rep. Nancy Mace introduced a federal trans bathroom ban under the title of the "Protecting Women's Private Spaces Act." While this began as an attempt to bar newly-elected Representative Sarah McBride of Delaware from using the women's restroom in her own place of work as a legislator - which is unacceptable on its own merits - it will not end there. Speaker Johnson's decree in support of Mace's proposal reiterated the same argument: that this is an act designed to protect women, to keep us safe, because "women deserve women's only spaces." To introduce this legislation on the International Transgender Day of Remembrance - a day commemorating trans people worldwide who have died due to hate and violence - is appalling. To pretend Mike Johnson and the House GOP care about the safety of women, given the candidate they just elected and the Cabinet nominations he continues to make, is beyond naive.
Over the past several years, as trans bathroom bans have been enacted in communities across the country, we have seen firsthand the cascading negative effects. No one is made safer by this. Certainly trans youth are not, as we saw firsthand from the shocking, violent death of Nex Benedict, a 16-year-old nonbinary youth in Oklahoma who complied with exactly such a bathroom restriction and was brutally beaten by classmates in February of this year. But even the women and girls these bills purport to protect are at increased risk; this legislation empowers individuals with narrow definitions of gender presentation to appoint themselves bathroom cops, and harass anyone they do not believe is publicly performing the role of womanhood correctly.
Lesbians and butch women, women who are unusually tall, women who have short hair, women who wear baggy or "masculine" clothes, women of color in professional sports whose bodies are critiqued for their strength, even simply women who wear baseballs caps: all of this is sufficient evidence for increased harassment. This is not even a new phenomenon; there are news stories of exactly these cases going back to the bathroom bans of 2016. It will not just be Rep. McBride who suffers for this; it will be your own congressional staff - anyone who is queer, trans, nonbinary, gender-nonconforming, or simply does not fit the stereotype of female physical appearance - whose workplace harassment you would be enabling if Mace's proposal is allowed to pass.
The people who make women's restrooms unsafe are people like Nancy Mace, who are banking on the silent complicity of other cisgender women to support the lie that the majority of us feel safer and more comfortable with trans people pushed out of our spaces. The end goal of trans bathroom bans is not limited to who uses which bathroom; it is a way to test the public's compliance with eradicating trans and nonbinary people from public spaces altogether. In the wake of the recent presidential election loss, it seems clear that it is also a test of the moral backbone of the Democratic Party, and whether we will choose to abandon our progressive values for the sake of expedience and permit more Nex Benedicts to suffer.
boosting the Cisgender Women Against Bathroom Bans petition again, please sign and share if you missed it the first time around! Itβs at a little under 8,500 signatures now and we would love to try to get it to 10,000 by the weekend!
actionnetwork.org/petitions/no...
my terminally online brain rly said we're getting another social media to hyperfixate on so here we are!!!!