For what it's worth, I do see a space for extending and maintaining existing Nuclear capacity in the medium term until a global renewable energy network is functional. But making new Nuclear the central pillar of decarbonising efforts leaves us more exposed to the consequences of unanticipated risk.
06.02.2025 22:41
๐ 1
๐ 0
๐ฌ 1
๐ 0
@teagsamatic.bsky.social I sense I won't have the answers that will satisfy your scepticism, but I think the benefits of a renewable future is not only safer but more desirable than one built on nuclear.
06.02.2025 22:35
๐ 0
๐ 0
๐ฌ 1
๐ 0
Investing in global infrastructure is an excellent way to make allies, decrease tensions, tackle poverty, not to mention address the exploitation of colonialism.
06.02.2025 22:34
๐ 0
๐ 0
๐ฌ 1
๐ 0
Not only do we have plenty of renewable sources in the UK ripe for expansion, including but not exclusively solar & wind, we need to invest in global energy infrastructure. Including developing economies, feeding global energy supply & creating unionised industries in places they are most needed.
06.02.2025 22:14
๐ 2
๐ 0
๐ฌ 2
๐ 0
My wars? I'm against wars. At the heart of most global conflict is control of non-renewable resources, whether that be Oil, Gas and Coal. The same could be the case if Nuclear expansion leads to demand outstripping supply for Uranium.
Power needs to come from a global network of renewables.
06.02.2025 22:06
๐ 0
๐ 0
๐ฌ 1
๐ 0
You're being a bit facetious. The point is that the safety & security of nuclear power stations cannot be secured in the face of increasing unpredictable global factors. Even with auto shut down plants it is perfectly plausible that uncontrollable factors can interfere with devastating consequences.
06.02.2025 21:55
๐ 0
๐ 0
๐ฌ 1
๐ 0
They do not have to be bombs to pose a huge risk. Look what happened with Fukushima. More nuclear plants in the context of a world with extreme flooding and wild fires is dangerous. Not to mention global destabilisation leading to hot wars whereby nuclear power plants will become military targets.
06.02.2025 21:38
๐ 3
๐ 0
๐ฌ 1
๐ 0
In an increasingly unstable and unsafe world, with unpredictable wars and extreme weather conditions, there is nothing more dangerous than suggesting we build Nuclear Power plants, which are singularly the most destructive force ever created if they are not being operated in safe & stable conditions
06.02.2025 17:56
๐ 4
๐ 0
๐ฌ 1
๐ 0
How about less billionaires?
And instead more schools, hospitals and council houses?
@greenparty.org.uk will always stand with the 99%.
๐๐ผ
01.02.2025 18:40
๐ 301
๐ 110
๐ฌ 10
๐ 5
Labour will kill your granny and cut off their winter fuel payments.
But it won't dare tax a non dom.
Entirely bought & paid for by the super rich.
27.01.2025 08:47
๐ 205
๐ 74
๐ฌ 18
๐ 4
REAL HOPE. REAL CHANGE
WHOSE SIDE IS LABOUR ON?
Green Party
Promoted by Chris Williams on behalf of The Green Party, both at PO Box 78066, London SE16 9GQ
So Labour can find the money to 'relax' their changes to the non-dom tax regime but they can't find the money to restore the winter fuel allowance or lift children out of poverty by scrapping the two-child benefit cap ๐ค
Whose side are they on?
24.01.2025 11:59
๐ 292
๐ 114
๐ฌ 16
๐ 6
Zack at a podium behind a Palestinian flag.
We don't gather to only mourn the dead and the endless destruction.
Our government has been complicit in selling arms to a country committing a genocide.
We gather to demand justice and an end to the occupation.
@pscupdates.bsky.social
18.01.2025 17:03
๐ 350
๐ 104
๐ฌ 7
๐ 4