😯 Join us today for @seangivnish.bsky.social presentation!
🧑💻 Send us a DM if you don't have the Zoom link.
05.03.2026 12:28
👍 2
🔁 3
💬 0
📌 0
😯 Join us today for @seangivnish.bsky.social presentation!
🧑💻 Send us a DM if you don't have the Zoom link.
😯 Happening this week!
📆 Be sure to join us and share with your peers
👉 Remember to join our mailing list to receive the link for the webinar and our announcement.
🌈 We are happy to announce our next webinar!
@seangivnish.bsky.social will present his super interesting work on the HIV/AIDS movement in Africa on March 5th.
📆 Be sure to join us!
Be sure to submit to proposal if you have any upcoming work you would like to present, especially in a safe and queer space 😎
👉 If you are not already registered, you can join our mailing list here and get all of our updates and the Zoom link for the session:
February 5th Angelia Wagner & Joanna Everitt w/ Mireille Lalancette & Karen Bird University of Alberta & University of New Brunswick To Queer or not to Queer? 2SLGBTQI+ Candidates’ Use of Instagram During the 2021 Canadian Election 9am PT/12pm ET/5pm GMT Online seminar on zoom Logo of the Queer Politics Seminar consisting of the different colours of the pride rainbow as interwoven stripes
🌈 We are very happy to announce the first session of 2026!
Next week, on February 5, @angeliawagner.bsky.social and @joannaeveritt.bsky.social will present their amazing work on queer Canadian candidates and social media.
📆 Be sure to join us!
Thanks! Happy to see that it’s already making good contributions 🤩
Thanks Stu! Your comments were really helpful when I presented it in the @queerseminar.bsky.social and I’m always glad for your feedback on everything :)
Homophobia alive and well in adoption decision-making 😱
Yet to surpass the (professional) fun we had in writing this piece now out in latest issue of @psrm.bsky.social
We know political identities share the valence we assign to others. Here we asked, do valence signals also shape the partisanship we assign to others?
doi.org/10.1017/psrm...
Thrilled to share our new paper with amazing Agus.
We show that non-traditional families, especially open and age-gap couples, face substantial prejudice. Even LGB couples encounter bias, highlighting persistent inequalities in societies often seen as tolerant.
Open access to the article available in my new (and first website) 🤓
Marginal means interaction between sexuality of the couple and type of relationship.
Marginal means interaction between sexuality of the couple and age difference between partners.
Furthermore, our interactions showed a compounded effect between sexuality, relationship type and age difference. Both open and age-gap homosexual couples, especially those consisting of two men, were significantly less preferred than heterosexual couples with the same characteristics.
General marginal means model showing the effects of each characteristic of the experiment in the preference of respondents for a couple to adopt.
Our general model of marginal means revealed multiple layers of sexual prejudice within the Catalan society. Respondents showed significantly less preference for non-traditional relationships, including same-sex couples, and particularly open and age-gap relationships.
Example table of the experiment. It includes characteristics such as names of partners (cue for sexual orientation), type of relationship (open/closed), age of partners, education level of partners, values and reason to adopt.
We conducted a conjoint experiment as part of the 2022 Sociopolitical Survey of the Centre d'Estudis d'Opinió in Catalonia. In this experiment, we asked 4,298 respondents to select one of two couples seeking to adopt a child, after evaluating different characteristics that were fully randomised.
Abstract of the paper, it reads: How widespread is sexual liberalism in tolerant societies? Theoretical and descriptive evidence suggests an overall liberalization in societal views on topics such as women’s rights and homosexuality. Yet, relying on sexual norms theory, this study unveils persistent sexual prejudice. We differentiate between “normalized” sexual issues, like same-gender marriage, which have gained mainstream acceptance, and “nonnormalized” issues, such as nontraditional sexual practices and relationships, which remain stigmatized. Through a conjoint experiment in Catalonia, Spain, we investigate public attitudes toward adoptive parents with varying sexual orientations, relationship types, and age differences, confirming that discriminatory preferences are prevalent in contexts with low social desirability. By highlighting the continued prejudice against both normative and nonnormative sexual issues, this research contributes to our understanding of the dynamics of sexual attitudes and the challenges facing LGBTQ+ politics and rights.
❗My first publication is out!
Using a conjoint experiment with adoption solicitations, @bertous.bsky.social and I demonstrate that modern societies still exhibit prejudice against non-traditional relationships, including same-sex, open and age-gap couples
More below and in @poqjournal.bsky.social
Do homophobia and sexual prejudice still exist in tolerant societies?
In POQ, Ortega & Bosco's new study reveals how non-traditional relationships continue to be stigmatised in parenting contexts, even in seemingly liberal societies.
Read now: doi.org/10.1093/poq/...
Europe.
Is moving military assets.
To deter an invasion.
By the United States of America.
Within the next decade the radical right is going to be the main force on the right in Europe (national and EU level). This includes far-right parties and formerly centre-right parties shifting their position. Moderate conservatism and Christian democracy will largely disappear on the right. 1/
happy & looking forward to organising the @queerseminar.bsky.social together w/ @blancobosco.bsky.social :D
also thanks to @bertous.bsky.social & @haasvioleta.bsky.social & all the previous organisers making the QPW possible! 🥰
Saying goodbye to the @queerseminar.bsky.social, today! Massive thanks to @bertous.bsky.social, co-organizing with you was the best part! 💖
We’re so happy to leave this important space in the hands of @alsogwenny.bsky.social & @blancobosco.bsky.social. Can't wait to see it grow! ✨
Be sure to join our mailing list if you haven’t already, many great sessions to come this year 🤓
Very thankful to @bertous.bsky.social and @haasvioleta.bsky.social for giving me the opportunity to participate in such an amazing space for queer researchers these couple of months, and very happy to continue the work with @alsogwenny.bsky.social in this new chapter 🥳
X is the megaphone of 21st century fascism and authoritariansim. It has poisoned public debate. It is a tool for bullying, abuse, and assault. X needs to disappear from our discourse. When people and institutions post there, it gives X credibility. It keeps it relevant. It's time to stop.
Sexual orientation, UK: 2024. Sexual orientation in the UK in 2024 by age, sex, marital status, and country, using data from the Annual Population Survey (APS). These are official statistics in development. Release date: 9 December 2025. Next release: To be announced.
Christmas has come early for those interested in sexual orientation data! 🎅📊
The Office for National Statistics has just released new sexual orientation data from the 2024 Annual Population Survey – and the story is one where the proportion of queer people in the UK continues to grow! 🧵
Out now with @adamsharris.bsky.social in @bjpols.bsky.social : We test “rooted” activist frames for LGBTQI tolerance—grounded in local history & national narratives—in Zimbabwe. Biggest thanks to the many people who helped get this off the ground. (1/3) Read here:
I think Transactual put it best (in reference to the girl guides) and now Labour too:
"There is no problem being solved here, only harm being done."
All to appease the right, who hate them anyway - shame on them.
This is a terrible move that will hurt the trans community as well as the Labour Party in the long term.
A critique of our (w/ @bertous.bsky.social) paper “Instrumentally inclusive” has just been published.
Our response is under review (see below on process) but we feel obliged to share our draft for balance since the comment has been released without the response.
osf.io/rn6h3/files/...