i get where you're coming from but you already live in a surveillance state, where you can't go anywhere without being flimed, do you really want every word you speak to be recorded as well?
i get where you're coming from but you already live in a surveillance state, where you can't go anywhere without being flimed, do you really want every word you speak to be recorded as well?
Youβve changed.
#mlp #queenchrysalis #thorax
einer der 6 kontakte in meinem handy ist ein spd politiker
Die Aufforderung, ein Mann mΓΆge mir doch bitte die Eier lecken, ist von meiner Seite aus explizit nicht als Beleidigung zu verstehen, sondern als Ausdruck von Zuneigung und Vertrauen. Oder als Zeichen, dass ich betrunken bin. Nur falls da mal Fragen aufkommen.
/gen
unironisch wo is das problem?
kp so ein vibe einf
benutzen eig mehrere leute den account? xd
ich mache das auch semi regelmΓ€Γig, um mich fΓΌr sachen zu motivieren und es funktioniert honestly eig echt gut
but they were right and how the dems handled hillarys campaign is the proof. they elevated trump and pushed a candidate that didn't have any ideas or will for real change, while working americans were getting poorer and more frustrated
je nachdem wie viel langeweile ich habe mache ich dir das nachher maybe
???? the democat ceo doesn't care about your voice and will further corpo dem campaigns regardless of what you want
and personally, as a european, i will never understand how socdems like aoc or bernie can bare to stay in a party like the dems
if these biases exist in positions of power inside the dem party, they will be hard to overcome, even if individuals only reinforce these biases subconsciously. this is not a one of but a systemic issue in the democratic party.
but the democrates have their biases against progressive/left candidates and will try to further the campaigns of corpo dems
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_De...
elfmeterscheiΓen :/
schere diggi
bowjack dr houseman
(die sind trotzdem nicht gut, aber yk)
mΓ€Γig aber auch nur, also ja nur eine orga, die das jetzt in 2 statements nochmal relativiert hat
areyou maldat or 8200?
um fair zu bleiben nur weil er einen talk in halle 1 gehalten hat, muss das nicht heiΓen, dass er groΓ einfluss auf die orga hat
i think it's more because dems have contributed or at least allowed trump to get to the position and power he has now. they have allowed him to stack the (supreme) court(s) and have elevated him in his 2016 campain
the only thing under his skin that would matter is a bullet
but you see how this definition fits both examples?
if "being against terrorism" can mean being against boko haram or being against russian freedom fighters that blow up recruitment offices, with no way to distinguish the two, then it means nothing at all
and terrorist is just a word for violence by people the western powers don't like. the protestors in hong kong could be considered terrorists, as could the uprising in nepal. describing them as terrorist adds no further information and removes more context than it adds.
i think it's both i want to know how you answer the question and make a point. the format of short text replies makes this the option by information per character.
my point is, that violence is part of every system, legality doesn't make it any more or less ethical
i just want to point out that terrorism is a really vague term and people, like the ice watchers in the us, are labeled as terrorists just because they resist their government
(see how google suggests two other definitions by the un, who doesn't have a universally accepted one and the cia one but thats neither here nor there)
but that means the resistance in myanmar, who fight against the authoritarian government are terrorists and therefore bad?