Metamodernism's Avatar

Metamodernism

@metamodernism

I make videos about architecture, transit, and cities. https://youtu.be/VrBWiFRc4qk?si=UEJo0s4hkHydLCGC

626
Followers
157
Following
204
Posts
21.06.2023
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Metamodernism @metamodernism

Maybe because the station boxes are often in the middle of the street? Though that would be a weird thing to clarify here

07.03.2026 02:31 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

What in the world? And where is this?

03.03.2026 20:14 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
Map of Inglewood Transit Connector BRT lines

Map of Inglewood Transit Connector BRT lines

Yes! I still think it’s very silly to serve two stations that have very few fare gates and were not designed for big events, but I suppose it’s nice they’ll have some dedicated infrastructure. Unfortunately most of the money on the project is getting spent on parking garages

03.03.2026 02:16 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

the APM probably not opening in time is a bummer but the bus shuttles they will run from the LAX/Metro station make a lot more sense than the Inglewood transit connector BRT that will open in a few years. Having buses start at LAX allows a connection with both the C/K lines and has way more capacity

03.03.2026 01:40 πŸ‘ 4 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

It’s fascinating how LA Metro, Muni, and MTS chose to do BRT with regular right-door buses but ACT and Omnitrans use doors on both sides. There would be tradeoffs with a β€œone size fits all” approach for BRT stations in CA but it would certainly help with bus procurement

02.03.2026 16:33 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Which bill is this?

02.03.2026 05:29 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Fun fact: El Segundo bans residential uses anywhere near their light rail stations because it’s zoned industrial. Glad we have SB 79 now!

27.02.2026 22:11 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Will be funny when after a few years in court, they get the builders remedy and can’t update their housing element to stop it.

25.02.2026 01:20 πŸ‘ 6 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Is SB 423 still alive as a 2-year bill? Seems like this one should be a priority before CAA starts funding a lot of ads for the HJTA measure

24.02.2026 20:07 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

I think there was a change order to make TBM placement easier in the west end in the future should they ever want to extend

16.02.2026 23:22 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

I remember something about an aerial gondola from the Metro department of extraordinary innovation a few years ago.

16.02.2026 19:28 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Going to be huge when the subway goes there and more people can avoid that godforsaken parking garage

16.02.2026 06:12 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

It’s owned by a couple who splits their time between Santa Monica and Cuba. Theres an article on them but I’m not going to post it because it’s on Breitbart

16.02.2026 02:27 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Also in typical LA county fashion, they had an under-advertised Pasadena Transit shuttle that ran from Metro rail for one summer using grant money and it got no ridership so they cancelled it

16.02.2026 00:12 πŸ‘ 4 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
LADOT commuter express bus map showing service on the 405

LADOT commuter express bus map showing service on the 405

There are a few! And if they added all-day/every day service and rerouted things a bit to better connect with Metro Rail and BRT, they would be much more useful. Full map here: ladot.lacity.gov/sites/defaul...

05.02.2026 17:54 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

True, but expresslanes raise money and speed up express buses (provided they don’t need to enter and exit the freeway more than once or twice)

05.02.2026 17:42 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

They are bonding against 105 expresslanes revenue to build it, but if they do an HOV - expresslane conversion for sepulveda pass it should be cheaper

05.02.2026 16:04 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

I wonder if they can bond against the expresslane revenue since those are supposed to open in a few years. Although Metro has a much lower toll cap than OCTA or RCTC so that really holds back the revenue stream

05.02.2026 16:03 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

I agree. Unlike the 10 there aren’t a lot of side streets people would use to skip the toll. Metro’s congestion pricing studies show this. It might not be enough to move the needle politically, but rearranging LADOT buses could provide a compelling transit alternative to during subway construction

05.02.2026 05:40 πŸ‘ 4 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

The vote didn’t pass for June ballot measure. It was sent back to committee (probably will be debated and amended) for a possible November ballot measure.

27.01.2026 20:29 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Is Santa Monica planning something similar for Measure GS? I’m less familiar with the mechanics of that one but hoping it can be amended in a similar way.

25.01.2026 19:14 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Lawndale is just under the 35k population requirement for the small cities exemption so it’s only a 0.25 mile radius. But Torrance and Redondo Beach will get the full 0.5 miles.

23.01.2026 05:57 πŸ‘ 9 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0

I could live with the G line being a separate line if they build an elevated metro along the busway and extend to Pasadena. B line can stay a subway and go to the Burbank HSR hub.

23.01.2026 03:31 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

According to numble Metro was trying to make the valley light rail and Sepulveda line one thing but they didn't get any private partner development proposals they deemed good enough.

23.01.2026 03:26 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

bsky.app/profile/meta...

23.01.2026 02:54 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

My cope is that K line south will unleash a wave of elevated rail along arterials in Los Angeles. Also hope the new Caltrans standards for allowing elevated rail along freeways is real. But still this is happening for the dumbest reasons possible.

23.01.2026 02:45 πŸ‘ 10 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

At least Cerritos changed their mind, but even if Lawndale changes their minds, there is no Metro money to pay for it. Probably will happen to Cerritos too. And then 20 years down the line they will pay a full billion dollars for an infill station.

23.01.2026 02:18 πŸ‘ 5 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

*LA METRO* opposes SB 79 - the law that makes it possible for more people to use the transit Metro builds! They worry cities that don't like SB 79 will slow down their projects. Metro wants to exempt LA County from the law, or maybe even all of California except the Bay Area. Just totally unhinged.

15.01.2026 21:12 πŸ‘ 21 πŸ” 3 πŸ’¬ 3 πŸ“Œ 1

Horrendous parking door placement, otherwise very good. I could see San Diego getting something this nice someday

13.01.2026 06:56 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

wonder if they will also do 1500 VDC third rail for wider spacing between substations

12.01.2026 17:47 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0