77th that (antivax counting, sorry)
06.03.2026 20:57
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
77th that (antivax counting, sorry)
Who will maintain all the bidets on that jet then
Exactly, now I can add hematological reasons not to be an endurance runner to my preexisting MSK and GI objections
My new band name is Foot Strike Hemolysis
Totally agree and am curious if you find typical non-AI EHR notes better or worse in this regard. I find them harder to read due to all the imported cruft and boilerplate. I'm an AI grinch in other aspects of my life but find that Abridge's benefits outweigh the downsides. And of course I read/edit.
Funny stuff, Dr. @SmartText@ @SmartLink@ @ExamYouDidn'tDo@ @BoilerPlate@ @Sig@
I read them all, they're fine. It's not literature. In the EHR era all notes are dogshit, just different flavors. Unless you just love yourself some pajama time wordsmithing notes no one will read.
Doctor of what?
All those histrionics from Prasad about the preschool masking genocide and now he’s a complicit part of the administration doing ALL. OF. THIS.
Meats and ferments arm was the request if I’m not mistaken
Someday, if there is any sliver of justice, when I have to do a peer-to-peer for some focacta insurance denial it’ll be Peter Attia on the other end of the call.
These absolute bozos can’t even see that “let it rip” would have increased medical revenue, if they’re assuming doctors are evil and do it all for the $$$
Salter-Harris type 1 is the tastiest Salter if you ask me
That’s also his dating approach
Considering your country decided not to give me the Nobel Prize in Medicine for having cured 8 ear infections plus, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of healing
Is he even susceptible, I understand that his own gender-affirming care would have shriveled the target organs
It’s totally fine to thoroughly clean your VCR head while taking this prescription might be safer
If only we used to have something like Consumer Reports for vaccines, like ACIP before that leathery creep got to it
What a fantastic helpful response, thanks! Have been very ambivalent about MenB shared decision-making recs for “college”. Seems newer combo vax with acyw+b at age 16 might not even cover college years well for menB. Hmm …
Curious about MenACYW and MenB ... how convinced are we that effectiveness wanes? Not just titers, as with other shots titers drop and don't mean lack of immunity since we expect memory B-cells etc to still protect?
Their poster for revised schedule has a footnote for RSV that is … unchanged from current approach. No guidance on higher risk kids >8m. This is all so freaking dumb.
I don’t even understand how for RSV now “high risk” is *every baby without maternal RSV shot* which is … unchanged? So it’s a shell game and they can now say they dropped to 11 recommended shots?
Oh yeah! Opposite hand to the nostril aiming for the eye (internally) and if you’re tasting it you’re wasting it
First with this they almost had me until the Venmo, second time was more fun, as I had missed the summons due to inpatient treatment for metastatic BOFA
Looking forward to it, especially thoughts on number of doses
“Morbidity” and “long term developmental outcomes” gives them so many non-preregistered outcomes to p-hack and not correct for multiple comparisons which is their typical MO.
AFAIK, newborn dose still fine with shared decision making, the 2 months otherwise thing is brain-dead as babies often get those shots at 6+ weeks, and the titers tomfoolery tells parents to discuss with their doctors so I don’t see this as changing my VFC practice, for now.
The language is so thoughtless here too, I don’t see this as binding pediatricians to discuss or offer titers, it’s parents who should discuss it with their docs?
Counter-point: for complex undifferentiated problems the writing certainly can help your medical thinking, but for routine visits and problems docs are using note templates or saved boilerplate dot-phrases already so I'm not convinced those have a thinking benefit over AI scribing in the modern era.
