Osintoilija's Avatar

Osintoilija

@osintoilija

Data-hungry, easily excited OSINT enthusiast with no easy answers. Has values, remains critical.

27
Followers
18
Following
107
Posts
14.05.2025
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Osintoilija @osintoilija

I'm a simple man - I see MS Paint, I follow.

25.02.2026 07:23 πŸ‘ 15 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

New moon tonight.

17.02.2026 12:59 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Where would one find a good set of AIS data to use as training material for a simple model?

31.01.2026 21:53 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Simple Bayesian filtering, a.k.a. spam or ham, should do the trick.

30.01.2026 10:09 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Looks like a group of Rusich weekend warriors on a border patrol with wildly varying equipment. They're occasionally doing similar social media stunts on the Finnish border.

12.10.2025 06:53 πŸ‘ 6 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Not literally tonight, but get your things in order without wasting any time.

01.10.2025 13:06 πŸ‘ 5 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

These are one-way single-use drones. Range (until fuel runs out) is estimated at 400–600 km, but lately even 700 kms has seemed plausible without a warhead, with extended internal fuel tank. There are no external mount points.

01.10.2025 10:18 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Also, looks like this drone has a 4-element Kometa-M counter-EW antenna on top. That's a really outdated version and probably easily fooled by Ukrainian EW measures.

01.10.2025 09:33 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Assuming this Gerbera was launched from the nearest bases in Bryansk area and just briefly visited Ukrainian air space, it still flew 1000+ kms - way over its range.

Possibilities:
1) Debris moved for reasons.
2) Flight path straight across Belarus
3) Flight path along the Lithuanian border.

Hmm.

01.10.2025 09:03 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0

I trust you have better visibility into this, although the evidence feels still pretty scarce in social media / news websites.

26.09.2025 09:45 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
2024 United States drone sightings - Wikipedia

Thanks, I guess it could be a drone? But in all honesty, I see a light with other flashing lights. Could it be a helicopter with a search light? Plane with approach / tail light?

I'll just leave this here for now, but willing to correct myself if / when more evidence gets published:

25.09.2025 06:33 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Last night more drones over at least four Danish airports:
- Aalborg
- Esbjerg
- SΓΈnderborg
- Skrydstrup
Drone incursion continued for several hours and there were many drones.

Still no videos. Still no drones captured. We'll just have to belive they were there.

25.09.2025 05:09 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Surely there must be plenty of videos of the drones? It's a large open public place, and even the police have described these drones as big and flown by capable pilots, whatever that means.

24.09.2025 18:38 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Maybe there's a 4G modem and a salvaged Russian SIM card inside as well.

24.09.2025 09:28 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Have you seen anything more detailed than the "here's a red straight line between the entry and and exit points" map authorities provided?

Based on that, it'd be easy to say this was a deliberate provocation. They must know where the int'l air space goes and there's no linear shortcut on Est coast.

23.09.2025 12:49 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Some people should read a bit on moral panic and take a moment to look back and self-reflect.

Ru has become our 21st century folk devils. We've stopped admitting contradicting evidence or faults in our own logic. Even our sense of reality has gone, if we can deny a war exists, and then it doesn't.

23.09.2025 12:38 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Drones over Copenhagen and Oslo airports. Flights diverted. Police and media at the scenes. Spec ops helicopter in standby. Big drones, unavailable to civilians. Capable operators.

Let's see the videos! There's got to be hours and hours of footage from all possible angles, right?

...Right?

23.09.2025 06:23 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Turns out the distance traveled in Estonian air space was 170 kms. Thus, the cruising speed of MiG-31 is 460 kt / 850 kmh.

20.09.2025 16:43 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

A covert strike? I'm a friend of Clancy novels as well, but isn't it a bit asymmetrical and just calling for more escalatory actions in return?

Hot defense feels appropriate, but I feel pessimistic. An attempt to turn air policing –> air defense will stall due to NATO countries' internal politics.

20.09.2025 08:40 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Two data points doesn't make a trend, but my personal hunch is these provocations will continue. I'm guessing it's part of a larger strategy aimed at weakening Ukraine by pushing NATO to bolster its air defenses on the alliance's eastern border.

Finland, or maybe Norway next?

19.09.2025 21:15 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Re: Ru violation of Estonian air space on Friday morning. I usually remind commentators about the narrow air corridor between Finland & Estonia, and how Ru mil aircraft fail to stay in it on a semi-regular basis.

This was different. 12 mins for a 110 km trip means those MiGs wanted to cause a fuss.

19.09.2025 21:03 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0

Ru has more prod. capacity and exp. from drone warfare atm. NATO still has plenty of low-med alt. AD + testing grounds for new tech, and deep strike cap. Ukr lacks.

NATO clearly tries to stay an arms length away from the fight, although Ru makes it difficult. Prob. due to internal pol. differences.

19.09.2025 15:29 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

I'm all for Russian incompetence and negligence, but considering the drone had to fly 1,000+ kms and several hours into completely wrong direction across the western part of the country, we could probably immediately rule out incompetence.

19.09.2025 13:22 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Two very different scenarios are being mixed up.

There's the need to monitor the border for drones. This is doable with a sparse sensor diffusion network.

Then, there's the need to intercept autonomous swarms of strike, recon and decoy UAVs. A thin drone wall would be a poor strategy for this.

17.09.2025 07:43 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Any info if these are still modded with an "after-market" 4G connectivity kit, or does it already come pre-installed? I think Russia has been more or less hot-glueing Alcatel 4G USB stick modems to its UAVs to call back to base in-flight.

16.09.2025 15:57 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Currently published evidence seems to point to decoy drone Gerberas with no warheads. No Shaheds, which were probably intercepted in Ukraine already earlier during the attack.

My hot take here:
bsky.app/profile/osin...

I might take a look at those Polish and Lithuanian SIM cards on the UAVs next.

16.09.2025 15:39 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Dlaczego MON i prokuratura milczΔ… w sprawie zniszczonego domu w Wyrykach? Bo to nie rosyjski dron Prokuratura utajnia informacje o β€žniezidentyfikowanym obiekcie latajΔ…cym”, ktΓ³rego szczΔ…tki runΔ™Ε‚y na dom w Wyrykach na LubelszczyΕΊnie. Milczy teΕΌ MON. WedΕ‚ug i

Russia's Poland drone incursion from last week is being investigated, and watered down. The latest claim is that the house hit by *something* was actually hit by a malfunctioning missile from an F-16.

www.rp.pl/wojsko/art43...

16.09.2025 15:35 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Finally, either through EW interference or simply Russian incompetence and overlook, the drones crossed into Poland. A few were intercepted, but most quickly ran out of fuel and crash-landed.

I believe this is the simplest explanation. Interested to hear your thoughts!

15.09.2025 12:43 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Ukraine, with an upgraded ability to detect and classify drones, concentrated on intercepting the Shaheds. The Gerberasβ€”used as decoys or possibly communication relaysβ€”slipped through, flying some 700 km across Ukraine largely unchallenged.

15.09.2025 12:43 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

So, what most happened? Speculative part.

15.09.2025 12:43 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0