Jenna Beacom's Avatar

Jenna Beacom

@jfbeacom

Sensitivity/ authenticity reader, writer in various ways, v deaf. Repped by Marcy Posner at Folio Literary Management

1,312
Followers
1,447
Following
988
Posts
21.06.2023
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Jenna Beacom @jfbeacom

My initial reaction was literally (I texted this at 10:30 AM): “(Hopefully the Rooster has saved OSU from even considering bringing Gee back.)”

09.03.2026 18:56 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

The woman at the center of Ted Carter's resignation has an LLC registered to WOSU's headquarters and created a single podcast featuring Ted Carter and JobsOhio chief PJ Nauseef that earned 137 YouTube views in two months.

www.rooster.info/p/krisanthe-...

09.03.2026 18:51 👍 33 🔁 9 💬 14 📌 7

This fool's spring is advancing too quickly! Go back buds, you're in danger! Nooo, tiny leaves, you're gonna freeze in a week!

09.03.2026 17:55 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
Noem associate Madison Sheahan bought 2,500 marked vehicles for ICE Despite ICE employees seeking to keep a low profile in public, ICE official Madison Sheehan placed a bulk order for marked vehicles.

DHS made a massive purchase of 2,500 new custom marked ICE vehicles that are now sitting in parking garages because nobody wants to use them: “ICE has never had marked vehicles. We don’t want to use these - we can’t.” www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/immig...

09.03.2026 15:26 👍 3316 🔁 1524 💬 487 📌 202

Good!

09.03.2026 14:35 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

are the underlying cause of a lot of the mushifying. This plus the ubiquity of cell phones starting 2012-ish adds up to mush. 2/2

08.03.2026 02:49 👍 34 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0

I've been very online for a very long time. I think there was a good period there where it sharpened rather than mushified brains, generally. I think I would put 2009-2010 as when the algorithms started to turn evil. And I think the evil algorithms and the many ways they have optimized outrage 1/

08.03.2026 02:48 👍 55 🔁 2 💬 2 📌 0

Lots of folks cling to the idea that this comes down to Biden's inability to "sell" these accomplishments. I'm sorry, though, that's pure cope. Whiny resentfulness toward Dems & cities is *constitutive* of the RW worldview today, not something that can be turned on & off with policy.

07.03.2026 21:59 👍 281 🔁 43 💬 18 📌 4

I see that as being inexorably linked though. The people with a lot of money, a lot of power, and a vested interest have (way too much) ability to sway public opinion in a way that serves them.

07.03.2026 21:30 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

It's as simple as fossil fuel people who have money and who therefore have a lot of influence want to keep making money in that particular way, no?

07.03.2026 19:31 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

But see the electorate contains so many Nazis and Dems have to appeal to them if we're gonna win

07.03.2026 00:24 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

SHOULD THE U.S BLOT OUT THE SUN AND USHER IN AN AGE OF ETERNAL DARKNESS? - Gallup 2/20/26-3/5/26

NO - 41%
YES - 38%
UNSURE - 21%

06.03.2026 19:09 👍 13663 🔁 2972 💬 326 📌 185

A writer-director asked me for a meeting because they were worried I was going to derail their film's Oscar hopes. I didn't recant, the movie still got (way too many) Oscars.

05.03.2026 03:25 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Mark Proksch!

05.03.2026 02:38 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

I liked Paula Pell on Girls 5 Eva but I feel like this is a great showcase for her and I've been so impressed. Already was a big fan of Keke Palmer, Jake Whitehall, and energy vampire (I can't remember his name).

05.03.2026 02:36 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

I cannot wait. This is on my calendar, big, surrounded by sun rays. I put it there a while ago. Other people have Christmas, I have spring forward. (Okay I have Christmas too, but still.)

04.03.2026 01:43 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

I used Mastodon first, then Bluesky, and found that Bluesky was closer to my OG Twitter experience, which is what I was going for. This was both in terms of usage and in terms of activity. I can believe it was bad luck, but I didn't like the Mastodon vibes. Curated Bluesky is pretty good.

03.03.2026 20:26 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Not even the close to the worst of it but such an eye-roll at "shopping with wives." Jennifer Ouellette is kick-ass in her own right.

03.03.2026 15:37 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Yeah buying that immediately.

03.03.2026 00:49 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Plus the obvious response to someone employing a distraction is to not be distracted. That means not paying attention to this "distraction," (Iran) and we absolutely need to pay attention to that!

28.02.2026 14:37 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Post image

Update: The analysis in my article this AM explored what would happen if you moved all voters toward the "Dems strong" and "moderate" sides equally. But a better counterfactual would account for the fact that many more voters see Dems as weak than extreme — so strength moves more voters. Here's that

27.02.2026 16:56 👍 81 🔁 22 💬 5 📌 4

Yeah, the "if" formulation doesn't cut it, here.

25.02.2026 02:03 👍 11 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Henceforth, I will be describing the way that U.S. men’s hockey spectacularly squandered good will, brand recognition, and fan loyalty as “pulled a Target.”

They pulled a Target.

24.02.2026 15:08 👍 11887 🔁 2363 💬 66 📌 134

This is so true.

24.02.2026 02:26 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

I love that!

24.02.2026 02:25 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

God I hope so.

24.02.2026 01:42 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Seriously though. Let me add my thanks. Impeccable taste.

24.02.2026 00:04 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
I Caught POLITICO and the New York Times Laundering Pink Slime "News" How the sexist backlash to AOC and Gretchen Whitmer at the Munich Security Conference led me to a scammy "local news" outlet pushing a coordinated right-wing narrative

Interesting post about the coordinated anti-AOC smear campaign. It's 2016 again! Fake local news outlets on Facebook getting picked up until eventually it winds up in the Washington Post.

23.02.2026 21:38 👍 6569 🔁 1978 💬 132 📌 116

I feel like with AOC specifically out of all people, there is no escape from cursed remix and take out of context features, even if it's just screen recording. A good 20% of rightwing media is remixing her and taking her out of context (plus AI slop for good measure). Yes I'm making up 20% but a LOT

22.02.2026 19:12 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Generally you are awesome about access, but noting to please consider accessibility if you do this! (Podcasts for example tend to not be accessible for deaf people - they can be if there are always quick transcripts or if they have a YouTube element and can be watched with captions.)

22.02.2026 19:10 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0