🀩's Avatar

🀩

@aten

74
Followers
74
Following
46
Posts
18.05.2023
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by 🀩 @aten

Ummm this review is 9 years old.

Man yells at man yelling at cloud?

πŸ˜‚

30.06.2025 08:57 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

The next version is going to be completely clear.

10.06.2025 20:57 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

In his letter to the community explaining his decision to defy the Fed Gov't's demands, Harvard President Alan Garber included a link to the letter laying out those demands. Here it is:

www.harvard.edu/research-fun...

14.04.2025 20:15 πŸ‘ 1522 πŸ” 417 πŸ’¬ 103 πŸ“Œ 44

These guys really put the Con in conservative.

14.04.2025 16:03 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Democracy is serious business.

Proud to stand with probably 10,000 Californians protesting this government in Santa Rosa.

The square was completely filled. We were elbow to elbow almost two blocks away.

06.04.2025 15:47 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

I can’t stop thinking about the fact that Jason Stanley and Timothy Snyder, the nation’s foremost academics and authors on fascism and tyranny, have essentially fled the country.

27.03.2025 09:25 πŸ‘ 4608 πŸ” 1155 πŸ’¬ 217 πŸ“Œ 96

I thought I was good at telling jokes but it was just the Punning Kruger effect.

25.03.2025 13:52 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

If you accept that non-citizens have no right to due process, you are accepting that citizens have no right to due process. All the government has to do is claim that you are not a citizen; without due process you have no chance to prove the contrary.

24.03.2025 22:18 πŸ‘ 27732 πŸ” 10514 πŸ’¬ 325 πŸ“Œ 572

This is blatantly illegal and dangerous beyond belief.

Our national security is in the hands of complete amateurs.

What other highly sensitive national security conversations are happening over group chat? Any other random people accidentally added to those, too?

24.03.2025 17:58 πŸ‘ 4160 πŸ” 929 πŸ’¬ 348 πŸ“Œ 71
The risk of politician coins comes from the fact that they are such a perfect bribery vehicle. If a politician issues a coin, you do not even need to send *them* any coins to give them money. Instead, you just buy and hold the coin, and this increases the value of their holdings passively.

Furthermore, there is deniability: holding the coin is, in terms of financial effect, a linear combination of donating to the issuer and gambling. Hence you can have the intention of doing the former but when challenged claim that you are doing the latter.

You can even hold the coin privately, and show that you are holding it to whoever you need to show; you do not need any zero knowledge proofs, you just send a test transaction.

This is all risky to democracy, for reasons very similar to what I wrote in https://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2021/08/16/voting3.html , https://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2020/09/11/coordination.html and elsewhere. TLDR: the economic arguments for why markets are so great for "regular" goods and services do not extend to "markets for political influence".

I recommend politicians do not go down this path.

The risk of politician coins comes from the fact that they are such a perfect bribery vehicle. If a politician issues a coin, you do not even need to send *them* any coins to give them money. Instead, you just buy and hold the coin, and this increases the value of their holdings passively. Furthermore, there is deniability: holding the coin is, in terms of financial effect, a linear combination of donating to the issuer and gambling. Hence you can have the intention of doing the former but when challenged claim that you are doing the latter. You can even hold the coin privately, and show that you are holding it to whoever you need to show; you do not need any zero knowledge proofs, you just send a test transaction. This is all risky to democracy, for reasons very similar to what I wrote in https://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2021/08/16/voting3.html , https://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2020/09/11/coordination.html and elsewhere. TLDR: the economic arguments for why markets are so great for "regular" goods and services do not extend to "markets for political influence". I recommend politicians do not go down this path.

On the risks of politician coins:

24.01.2025 01:50 πŸ‘ 758 πŸ” 185 πŸ’¬ 27 πŸ“Œ 31

What’s the difference between a gov controlling an algorithm, silently eliminating reach for things it doesn’t like, vs the same gov using its power, to demand that the platform remove the things it doesn’t like.?

In China they are overt. With TikTok in the US, they control silently

19.01.2025 17:10 πŸ‘ 72057 πŸ” 11244 πŸ’¬ 2196 πŸ“Œ 421

Bryan MacCormack, the executive director of a New York-based immigrant rights group, was pulled over by CBP with two undocumented passengers in the vehicle. He knew his rights, refused to acknowledge their "warrant", and despite CBP threatening him, the agents eventually were forced to let him go.

18.01.2025 02:46 πŸ‘ 11909 πŸ” 5394 πŸ’¬ 98 πŸ“Œ 208

@jvl.bsky.social with the perfect quote:

"That’s the dual hermeneutic the populists use for evaluating the world. If you’re an expert who got one thing wrong, it damns you. If you’re a total lunatic crank who gets one thing right, it makes makes you bulletproof."

18.01.2025 03:57 πŸ‘ 1151 πŸ” 282 πŸ’¬ 17 πŸ“Œ 14

Anything would be nice.

17.01.2025 00:08 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Trying to focus on being pissed off, but also getting distracted by how cyberpunk it is that I need to track down my own clone and kill it because it’s selling me out to the corpos

15.01.2025 13:48 πŸ‘ 212 πŸ” 11 πŸ’¬ 4 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Over on Google, things are going great for 190 year-olds.

15.01.2025 03:55 πŸ‘ 4 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

So disappointing to hear Gurley on BG2 promoting lab leak theory, Jay Bhattacharya and demeaning Fauci.

02.12.2024 22:16 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Why are the people whose candidate won so angry?

30.11.2024 23:14 πŸ‘ 8 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0

SO I WAKE IN THE MORNING
AND I STEP OUTSIDE
AND I TAKE A DEEP BREATH
AND I GET RUN OVER BY SOME ASSHOLE USING TESLA AUTOPILOT

11.06.2023 16:43 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Hi Mr. Boatclub.

With love, how do you feel about the name β€œblindboy”?

I’m wondering if you’ve had any reflections on it over the years, specifically in regards to people with vision disabilities.

If so, I’d love to hear them.

Respectfully,

Ed

PS. No judgement or agenda. ✌🏽β™₯️

10.08.2023 03:53 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Did it!?

26.07.2023 13:45 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

$25 worth of veg is a tremendous success! WOW.

21.07.2023 08:14 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Let’s have a call next week!!!

20.07.2023 17:43 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

I def buy gear with this in mind now.

Conscious of β€œhow long is it going to take for me to know enough to have fun.”

Interestingly there are some things like the Chase Bliss Mood that I don’t understand but are still fun. πŸ˜‚

19.07.2023 17:48 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Again:

We fight alongside people who are most impacted by harm because they are *people.* even if the harm they experience doesn’t spread or impact anyone else.

Even if the harmdoers are never coming for me.

A more free world is one in which we all show up because people are at risk. Any people.

07.07.2023 04:17 πŸ‘ 273 πŸ” 97 πŸ’¬ 4 πŸ“Œ 3

You’ve gotta give Elon Musk some credit: Sure, he transformed Twitter into a haven for misinformation where the worst people on earth can pay to be first in your replies, but at least it doesn’t work

01.07.2023 23:01 πŸ‘ 1397 πŸ” 276 πŸ’¬ 12 πŸ“Œ 8

The Supreme Court using a completely fabricated harm to justify actual harm towards people who face real discrimination is an apt metaphor for modern conservatism

30.06.2023 14:13 πŸ‘ 1973 πŸ” 637 πŸ’¬ 30 πŸ“Œ 11

I think Ripple. I just saw a billboard that pitched exactly this.

27.06.2023 22:24 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0