The core language of R7RS is projected to be completed by 2028, a full 20 years after the previous full version of Scheme.
It'd better be the best Scheme I've ever laid eyes upon!
will up my otter content intake!!
oh god what's about to happen
welcome back! :D
It's only too late if you're dead, and you are not dead.
People, the time for *real* programming is upon us.
Now this, this has brightened my day. CDE forever.
omg thank you! ^_^
(editing html by hand) i wanna have control. i want a perfect <body>
@bsky.app should adopt did:ccp
did.baidu.com/did-spec/
@neocities.org FIX XHTML SUPPORT AND LET US USE XHTML AS INDEX >:3
YES GOD PLEASE ππ
A window of Mozilla Firefox with an open tab reporting an XML parsing error due to a mismatched tag.
April Fools idea: browser with a validating HTML5 parser. Any syntax error hard-aborts processing like in XML, leaving just an error message.
java applets walked so wasm could walk
I threw it together myself using the SVG source code on the W3C website: www.w3.org/assets/logos...
"CSS level 3 β" badge featuring the new W3C logo.
i'm so extremely ambivalent
The number of namespace URLs pointing at a Microsoft-hosted schema file from 2002 in my API description should be exactly zero. This is not a privilege, it is a prerequisite of human dignity.
what if soapcore supported wsdl 2.0 . what if we lived in a world that made sense
damn right go off π
I'm COPING AND SEETHING over the new W3C logo what is this?????
In the style of The Browser Company's logo: the PROPRIETARY NON-W3C STANDARD COMPANY of SEATTLE
@bnewbold.net @pfrazee.com here's the new bluesky logo.
i accept paypal and venmo
or maybe it's a good thing that the xlink attributes don't interfere with the rdf information set
RDFa attributes must either be in no namespace, or the XHTML namespace, others aren't valid; so you can't get that brevity of expression if you use the sophisticated XLink attributes like you would otherwise.
Not a showstopper, but definitely unsatisfying.
γγ¦γγ§γ
An XSL-FO renderer for OpenXPS is one of those things I want to exist but would never want anyone to have to implement.
People say "learn the fundamentals of web development!" but then act like you're crazy for knowing SGML.
I was wondering what if Tim Berners-Lee had chosen a quieter syntax for HTML back then, maybe XML wouldn't be so verbose. Then it occurred to me, has anyone ever tried to define (a subset of) JSON as a concrete syntax of SGML?
Maybe it's the year of the ReactOS Desktop
See kids, this is what happens when you don't do your DEI!
not all recursive calls necessarily generate a new stack frame, GCC has `-foptimize-sibling-calls` to try tail-call elimination (basically simplifying a call into a simple jmp)
