Twenty years ago, I raised the Fully Depolarizing Noise Conjecture for Physical Bell States, which, if holds, would be a major obstruction for quantum computation.
gilkalai.wordpress.com/2026/03/06/t...
Twenty years ago, I raised the Fully Depolarizing Noise Conjecture for Physical Bell States, which, if holds, would be a major obstruction for quantum computation.
gilkalai.wordpress.com/2026/03/06/t...
In a recent post on Quantum Frontiers—the first in a series of three—Dominik Hangleiter discusses the (inportant) question of whether quantum advantage (also known as “quantum supremacy”) has been achieved.
gilkalai.wordpress.com/2026/01/15/d...
Can you identify the two mathematicians in the picture?
gilkalai.wordpress.com/2026/01/13/a...
gilkalai.wordpress.com/2025/12/21/n...
November 2025 -- A lot of lectures in Mathematics Computer Science and Physics.
A pleasant visit to the Israeli Quantum Computing Center.
gilkalai.wordpress.com/2025/11/13/a...
I discuss (following Aaronson) the role of computational complexity to restrict physical theories, and the meaning of probability in our physical world. I quote Gidney on what it would take to prove me wrong, and Deutsch on MWI and Shor's algorithm.
gilkalai.wordpress.com/2025/11/03/c...
mathoverflow.net/questions/50...
I posted a question on Math Overflow on the use of LLMs (such as ChatGPT) in mathematics.
A wonderful breakthrough by Dror Bar-Natan and Roland Van der Veen. Knot invariants which can be computed for diagrams with hundreds of crossings, are powerful, fun, and carry profound dreams and conjectures.
gilkalai.wordpress.com/2025/09/25/d...
48 interesting questions from the audience of recent lectures about quantum computation, where I presented my argument for why quantum computing—and even significant early milestones toward it—are fundamentally impossible.
gilkalai.wordpress.com/2025/07/30/s...
After 78 years, an exponential improvement for Ramsey numbers were found by Jie Ma, Wujie Shen, and Shengjie Xie.
gilkalai.wordpress.com/2025/07/23/a...
Joram’s seminar 2025: Hypercontractivity, Groups and Representations. Splendid connections between combinatorics, algebra, analysis, and geometry, using representation theory and hypercontractivity. There are some applications to TCS and physics.
gilkalai.wordpress.com/2025/07/15/j...
Birthday conferences for Saharon Shelah and Yuri Gurevich, and a lecture by Ronald de Wolf on quantum proofs for classical theorems.
gilkalai.wordpress.com/2025/07/07/h...
A Remarkable discovery in London's skyline!
gilkalai.wordpress.com/2025/06/27/a...
Shakhar Smorodinsky settled (on the spot) an old Radon-type problem that I posed in the 70s. In addition, an update, pictures from the recent Erdos lecture by Mehtaab S. Sawhney, and some light on the mysterious huge digital thermometer in our lecture hall. gilkalai.wordpress.com/2025/06/18/s...
Later today, (17:00 Israel time, June 3) I give a zoom lecture followed by conversation: A critical view on quantum computing, at the Ethereum foundation. There will also be a live streaming, open to all, here: youtube.com/live/HhWWkTk...
One slide on the amazing story of mathematical logic at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
gilkalai.wordpress.com/2025/05/28/l...
Very nice thread. Thanks for listening and reporting!
Sphere packing problem - amazing progress by Bo'az Klartag
gilkalai.wordpress.com/2025/04/09/b...
Hong Wang and Joshua Zahl’s Breakthrough on Kakeya’s Problem in Three Dimensions: Insights and Resource
gilkalai.wordpress.com/2025/04/04/h...
I recognized the right picture from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survivo... ; What is the point?
The second part of my post on quantum computer skepticism featuring my own view and some counter arguments to various skeptical claims made by John Preskill, Aram Harrow, Scott Aaronson, Dave Bacon, and Boaz Barak.
gilkalai.wordpress.com/2025/02/26/q...
Sergey, is the stronger claim of MZM based topological qubit, gives new avenues to check the concerns regarding data manipulation and data selection?
What you say makes sense: Perhaps we can check if we have genuine qubits and even get some information on their quality by repeated measurements without verifying the MZM claim directly. (Perhaps this can support the MZM claim indirectly.) Alas, I dont understand the technical issues well enough.
Re try: some experimental claims are of the form "(*) If A then B", where B is a system representing a "topological qubit" and A asserts that certain subsystems are Majorana zero modes. There are 1) doubts about "A", 2) claims of insufficient data, 3) doubts on (*).
Dear Barbara, in the Microsoft endeavor, some experimental claims are of the form "(*) If A then B", where B is a system representing a "topological qubit" and B is subsystems representing Majorana zero modes. There are 1) doubts about "B", 2) claims of insufficient data, 3) doubts on *.
The post explains a "no go" approach for Majorana zero modes:
Is it the case that samples from states demonstrating Majorana zero modes on a NISQ computer goes (for large numbers of qubits) beyond the Kalai-Kindler LDP complexity class?
gilkalai.wordpress.com/2025/02/21/m...
But does the paper (and/or the earlier arXiv preprint) claim "topological qubit"?
Hi Sergey,
It looks that they claim creating "the first topological qubit" which is (as far as I know, please correct me if I'm wrong) something that goes beyond "just" Majorana zero modes. Is this correct? (That they went a step further?) Or is it the case that they claim MZM as earlier papers?
I provide links, references, and a brief discussion of the skeptical views regarding quantum computing held by Robert Alicki, Michel Dyakonov, Leonid Levin, Oded Goldreich, and a few others.
gilkalai.wordpress.com/2025/02/17/r...
DQC, The slang "is used to describe someone who intentionally engages in savage or hostile behavior, particularly in a verbal or online setting." However, if you follow what I write in these two posts and in my twenty years of qc research and debates, my primary massage is quite the opposite.