Autistic Arab

Says a lot about the world that both of them are pedophiles.

Gonna need a source for that

Glock isn't responsible for cops being stupid. The trigger safety is a safety, it stops the trigger from pulling itself under inertia.

Bumpstocks were approved because they do not fit the US legal definition of a machine gun.

Have you ever shot a semi auto shotgun before? They're not very fast.

Robinson XCR, aka RA SCAR

Of all the SCAR trials rifles I have shot, I will say without a doubt the best so far is the XCR. Basically every ergonomic edge the FN SCAR had over the RA SCAR was offset by weird issues like the fact the FN SCAR beats itself to death over time. USSOCOM made the wrong choice in my opinion.

If you genuinely think Hitler, a person who orchestrated the deaths of millions based on their religion and ethnicity, is more compassionate than a person who shot a dog, then you need to be institutionalized. You are not capable of existing in society if you are that insane.

Basically all of them yes, its the nature of the beast, stuff like ww2 memorabilia has to be real stuff though, no reproductions.

Yeah as long as they're not full of crappy cheapo ARs, Turkish shotguns, and pot metal pistols. The coolest gun shows are the ones with tables full stuff you don't see at generic gun shops.

Average Joe Schmo who loves his Smith And Wesson 686s and obscure AR-15 variants at the bottom.

Not really, there are tons of people who legit just are very interested in firearms and don't collect them because they fear the apocalypse or whatever. You could probably make a "preparative index" or something for gun collectors and owners, with idiots like Lucas Botkin at the top of it and your

I even have a little book from when I was like 5-6 years old where I would sketch how I thought some firearms would work, and my ideas for them. And now, I live the dream, working for my country's military doing what I love, which is making and repairing guns.

Oh, actually, I did dig into why I find them fascinating! Its because I have been interested in guns since I was a child, due to me liking small, handheld mechanical devices, such as guns. The autistic in my username isn't a joke.

I have a single FLC, not really "tactical" and own it because it was given to me by a vet as a present since he knew I liked older early 2000s militaria. My "shit getting crazy" plan is continuing with my life and going to work because shit will never get crazy here.

Woah, cool studies, too bad that won't make me stop buying old Mausers, studying them, and shooting them at big pieces of metal at the gun range.

I have six modern military rifles, all pretty eclectic because some of the non AR stuff can be interesting, and a single "normal" M4A1 that I have because its what I work on daily and I like shooting it at the range. I have a lot of ammo because I like to shoot my collection.

Anyways, this is stupid. Gun collections are fine,the vast majority of serious gun collectors are productive members of society, some ofbthe best collections are among people like doctors, lawyers, engineers, etc. They collect classic firearms like some people collect classic cars.

And do you believe they collected old obsolete guns because of a conspiracy theory?

And what do they collect?

WARNING IM A BOMB READY TO GO OFF BECAUSE MY MAUSER COLLECTION DROVE ME CRAZYYYYYYY

I don't think you know many gun collectors. Most of them collect a specific class or type of gun because of their mechanisms, historical relevancy, or just because they're something esoteric. Like I collect Mausers because there are so many odd variants and they've got some neat history going on.

It was made for skeet, trap, and killing birds.

The AR-15 was not on the civilian market before the M16 was adopted and the SKS was not a purely semi auto weapon, even in 1944-45 during its trials there were select fire variants.

Its a truke, the dude is 100% right about the uniform. You can even see the edge of a Canadian patch on dukes arm.

My thoughts are you are very inconsistent on your beliefs and have a very odd pop culture view on history, and don't have much regard for human life.

You just said destroying monuments related to Native American genocide would be a real historical statement. Why would you be fine with civil war monuments that celebrate generals who orchestrated genocide before an after the civil war?

Also, are you a Genocider? You were in the military.

So are you okay with destroying Civil War monuments of the north now?

Sherman waged total war on Native Americans. He isn't someone to fetishize.

Are you a Sherman fan?