bars
bars
My review of Michal Pollan's book on consciousness: www.science.org/eprint/FTJG7...
Congratulations!!!
The worst thing was lying about patientsβ symptoms
Just do science
I agree that the line of thought I was sketching is hard to test. But I call your attention to the last sentence of the article: "A breakthrough will be needed for progress, and failing to recognize that a breakthrough is needed may not be conducive to nding it."
There are a couple of paragraphs that are supposed to be a reply to this point
Iβd be glad to do that
Understanding whether consciousness depends on computational roles, biological realizers, or both, is crucial for assessing the prospects of consciousness in AI and less complex animals. end/
subcomputational biological realizers favors consciousness in simpler animals. Current theories of consciousness are 'meat-neutral', but if specific physical substrates are necessary, AI may never achieve consciousness. 3/
processes, are necessary for consciousness. By contrasting computational roles with their subcomputational biological realizers, I show that there is a systematic tension in our criteria for consciousness: prioritizing computational roles favors consciousness in AI, while prioritizing 2/
Computational functionalism claims that executing certain computations is sufcient for consciousness, regardless of the physical mechanisms implementing those computations. This view neglects a compelling alternative: that subcomputational biological mechanisms, which realize computational 1/
Can Only Meat Machines be Conscious? New paper in Trends in Cognitive Sciences, free download until November 26 with this URL: authors.elsevier.com/a/1luwh4sIRv...
Hmmmβ¦my reply is somewhat similar drive.google.com/file/d/1cIUk...
See tiny red line of link to today's actual news
Hilarious!
Iβm shocked my book is on this list. But, cool! Great company.
Consciousness before birth? Imaging studies explore the possibility | Science | AAAS www.science.org/content/arti...
Goodby global workspace and higher order theories
First order theories of consciousness win again
β€οΈ
Yes and the opposite makes much more sense. To get a conscious state you need a carefully orchestrated group of events but if any one of them goes wrong you fail to get consciousness. Many of those misfires will be unconscious so that is why there are more ways of having an unconscious state
Excellent interview of @neddo.bsky.social (www.youtube.com/watch?v=wM1f...)
They donβt mention the dorsal visual system which is adapted to fast motor responses
authors.elsevier.com/a/1kHSZ4sIRv...
in this short letter in TICS, @matthiasmichel.bsky.social & @jorge-morales.bsky.social argue against the episodic memory deficit interpretation of aphantasia proposed by @andreablomkvist.bsky.social.
a lack of imagery awareness may be all there is
1/2
since @neddo.bsky.social & i so rarely agree on anything other than restaurant choices, this is possibly legit
2/2
I should add that even though we do offer a possible alternative reading of the data to the one offered by @andreablomkvist.bsky.social, her work on aphantasia remains some of the best on the subject. If youβre interested in the topic, you should read her work. bsky.app/profile/hakw...