Although I guess the difference here is insider knowledge.
@lisaharding
British-Canadian π¬π§ π¨π¦ and still European πͺπΊ. Love film, art, design, theatre, the finest cheese, and now knitting! π§Ά Note, Iβm not LH the writer βοΈ and I do not post interesting stuff, or at least I try not to.
Although I guess the difference here is insider knowledge.
Agreed, and Mu$k wants Yaxley-Lennon in a UK political leadership role. This isnβt over yet.
Apart from the morality of it, isnβt it a security risk if a betting platform sees spikes like this? The platforms will be the first to know of enormous market shifting and life shifting events. I wonder how dramatically this activity shifts the odds and if that could be observed. Amazed itβs legal.
Agreed. There are so many parties splitting the vote and who knows what Musk is planning with Stephen Yaxley-Lennon. Somethingβs afoot.
And they won silver medals for their country!!
Hope they get an invite to the #MetGala this year too. It would be great to celebrate athletesβ achievements, not just actors, musicians and models.
Maybe coincidence but Chopraβs meditation app was renamed βInnerNowβ about a year ago which disassociates from him. I makes me wonder if the redactions will delay the release of names long enough so that at least the perps can get their houses in order, their finances, their businesses etc.
Sadly true. The stadiums are not big enough for starters.
Yes, humans are tools to the ultra rich.
Good point. It occurred to me that if these types of individuals were running the major talent agencies, the modelling agencies, the beauty contests then it might explain why popular culture and media promotes teenage youth as the beauty standard for adult women. Did they define βbeautyβ for women?
I think satire is something different. We can agree to disagree. Have a great day! π
Take it seriously is one approach.
Itβs one way of responding however people ridiculed Farage from the start and ridiculed him despite the constant media attention, many dismissed him and the leave vote and look where we are.
Agreed. Itβs working though. Look at the huge coverage they got for their ridiculous media stunt.
It canβt be dismissed. Itβs got a huge readership online, mainly due to its gossip. Itβs an easy read providing great sound bites for lazy conservatives and right wingers who canβt be bothered to look up facts but want to be told who to blame.
Did anyone ask about his choice of advisor in the form of Bannon whom he thanked for securing Brexit. Where are all the front pages and news headlines on that story? Instead we get constant, non-stop puff pieces and wall to wall coverage on a still minority party, with occasional βtoughβ questions.
π
I think the tan suit generated more outrage.
Oh wow our @38degrees.bsky.social petition to cap political donations in the UK has over 94k signatures!! π₯
There's still lots of time for amendments to Elections Bill. Would be so powerful to get it over 100k
Can you help? Please sign and share! Thanks! π you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/ta...
Am I imagining things but didnβt the Tories, under Johnsonβs leadership, oversee an investigation into Russian interference in UK politics/Brexit that was so heavily redacted it was worthless?
π΄Reform MPs Accused of Pandering to Putin After Skipping Russian Interference Debate
Nigel Farageβs party refused to attend the debate, called after more than 100,000 people signed a petition demanding a public inquiry into Russian interference in British politics
bylinetimes.com/2026/02/10/r...
And their views are given platforms by the media for no other reason than they are immensely wealthy (financially).
Or quiet piggy.
Was surprised by them choosing Mandy. Is it possible Trump had something to do with the selection knowing Mandelson was compromised and that he would represent the US interests more favourably in Britain?
Irks me when the presenters at Glastonbury sometimes get visibly drunk on tv and interview performers as if theyβre their personal friends. They each behave as if the Glastonbury festival coverage is their own personal vacation and weβre the flies on the wall. Itβs all very insular and cringeworthy
Agreed. I donβt watch much tv either but thereβs lots of radio and factual programming, drama, sports and childrenβs. So yes, as with all services very much depends on whatβs your βjamβ. Thereβs deffo room for improvement.
They have absolutely contributed to the rise of Farage in Britain and the βboth sidesβ reporting. I stopped listening to the Today Programme on Radio 4 when it was clear it had become pro-Brexit. Harms certainly have been done. No question.
βHow do they expect to cover the 2012 London Olympics?β they protested. Ermβ¦ maybe the same way they covered the Beijing Olympics from London.
100% agree. Though Β£15 per month is fanastic value compared to streaming services that include ads too. But I do agree itβs the plaything of Britainβs elite. You only had to listen the miserable protestations when the BBC decided to move a couple of its departments to Manchester in βthe provincesβ.
I did notice they seem to have doubled down on releases relating to Andrew and Fergie. Comparatively little detail coming through on his US associates. This runs deep, suspect many of his associates are still running the show. They can slow this down but canβt stop it - not followed the money yet.