Wait was there actually a hypoxia death as a result of that kit? Because if so I had communication with them when they put that listing up telling them that it was dangerous and that it was going to kill people.
You know those hypothetical survival situations where like "oh no we're trapped and we don't have food and somebody died, is it ethical to eat them?"
Would an organ donor mark on their driver's license count as consent?
Their body is being used to help other people survive after all.
Me reading Geralds game at the age of 7: surely this won't have any long lasting effects on my psyche
And yeah sure kids will get their hands on them, but that's a parenting issue not a government issue.
Alternatively, you could literally just have real life purchases that are of an adult nature like cigarettes, alcohol, or dirty magazines come with a code in the package that you can use as an 18 plus verification because the only way that you can buy those things legally is if you are of age.
So attaching your real life identity to a single online profile that mentions other online services creates a sort of spider web effect where because you have a valid identity in one place it can be used to pin down your other online activity.
Nepal's citizens organized a revolution on discord.
So you give your ID to me, because you want to continue using my service.
Eventually I get a subpoena from the government for your posts.
In those posts, you mentioned other online profiles, and since your identity is linked to your account, that means it was you who said those things.
Censorship isn't even the major issue.
Hypothetically let's say I created a social media platform that people talked on for years, mentioning other online profiles to each other.
Now, new update, in order to use my social media platform you need to register an ID.
Vladimir Pokémondesigner, upon being told to go pound sand:
Bro
And it's kind of fucking wild to me that of all the things to turn the world into 1984 it's advertising companies deciding what is profitable instead of government overreach. Big brother is a marketing firm that doesn't want their ads to show up around tough topics.
So things like unalive and whatnot, that type of speech is literally the double speak from 1984. Like in that story you couldn't say that things are bad, but you could say that they are double-plus un-good.
Because if you say things are bad then Big brother will censor you.
is this loss
realest shit in the whole wide world
The hands and legs can will have option to be nice and squeaky if your feeling hands are to much trouble 😘
intrusive negativity? i just tell those thoughts "fuck you, it's opposite day"
If you create a portal both in front of and behind an object so that you can see the back of the object through the portal, and tilt it towards one of the portals, assuming this happens in space and the only mass is the object, will it create motion by attracting itself with its own mass and go flat
The National Bird regularly dying from lead poisoning from eating lead ammunition fragments left in gut piles left behind by hunters field dressing their kills is the type of thing that would normally be taken as a sign from God, isn't it?
www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/l...
I mean they put skibidi toilet in fortnite so it's not like there's any kinda artistic integrity.
Isn't there like some pretty massive intellectual property issues there? If co-pilot wrote part of the code then who actually owns the code? Because it sounds like these tools primarily exist so that corporations can call dibs on my work. This is an erosion of ownership.
Those books ran from 2003 to 2014, well before AI lol
Is rosary just a religious fidget toy
Time to get someone's entire inbox forwarded to me by sending them an email with a fake footer, and then at the bottom tell it to add invisible rules, one that deletes this message, and another one that forwards everything they receive to an external email.
The funny little streaks that shine off into infinity from every goddamn street light
Is that what that is? Because I know somebody mentioned that to me in the past when I was getting glasses.
Honestly I kind of think that like my brain trained my eyes to be cross-eyed? Because then I can move the blurry text away from the good text so that I can read the stuff that's clear while the blurry stuff is off to the side so that I can ignore it.
And it's like yeah in my field of view, and in my consciousness, I see that I have double vision but I just focus on the one that's not blurry mentally, since that's the one I can read.
Question, is it normal to have double vision when looking at things on your phone? Like if it's close enough to my face that crossing my eyes together so that it would be a unified focus on what I'm looking at would be a physical inconvenience, I just don't do that. i Instead I just use one eye.
