's Avatar

@betsyhogan

58
Followers
63
Following
280
Posts
06.11.2024
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by @betsyhogan

I didn't know I could get more angry.

06.03.2026 00:00 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Oh, this should be great. Mumps causes sterility.

05.03.2026 20:09 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
N.S. premier booed at African Heritage Month gala as budget cuts spark upset | CBC News Tim Houston was booed as he delivered remarks at the African Heritage Month gala in Halifax on Saturday night. Houston's government delivered a budget last week that includes cuts to programs aimed at...

www.cbc.ca/news/canada/...

01.03.2026 14:43 👍 36 🔁 10 💬 3 📌 1

Probably just as well she's owning it. Isn't she pretty much its author?

26.02.2026 21:14 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

They're nothing on St. Mary Mead and Oxford.

24.02.2026 02:05 👍 9 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

You've fomented revolution. And in the middle of the Olympics too, which is next level. Takes a lot to break through Olympics brain.

20.02.2026 17:22 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Pathetic cowards.

18.02.2026 04:57 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

I'm not surprised that the Trump administration thinks that's how scientific findings work, but I'm a little surprised that someone who works for the NYT thinks that's how scientific findings work. (Less surprised than this time last year, but still a little surprised.)

13.02.2026 02:23 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Go look up what country those athletes represented until Russia was banned from these games. We'll wait.

10.02.2026 01:05 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Oops. Didn't work.

06.02.2026 22:57 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

And their colleagues framed it like they deserved it.

30.01.2026 16:31 👍 20 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Multiple reports that ICE is highly active at the Calais Maine border crossing snd they are taking FN folks into custody (if you don’t have a blood quantum letter).

25.01.2026 00:23 👍 39 🔁 42 💬 1 📌 8

That close to the end it should be fine if it just sits in the oven as it cools down.

25.01.2026 00:11 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

I'm so angry right now that I don't even know what to do with myself.

24.01.2026 19:45 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Ya, it's a relief, actually. Now it doesn't even need to be dealt with.

23.01.2026 02:54 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Bet we are....

22.01.2026 02:04 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

It's quite difficult to muster up much more than exhausted pity for anyone who "feels betrayed" by this president, with his record running from delusional over-promising to deliberate pathological lying. (Unless their votes re-inflicted him on the world, in which case I can muster up loathing.)

19.01.2026 20:26 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

You're currently seeing the reaction of one city in a blue state, and the masked thugs have been unleashing the racist attacks for months. Half of you voted for this monstrous president A SECOND TIME. There is no important difference.

19.01.2026 16:12 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Ya, I think they'll find they did. It just turns out they didn't mean it.

18.01.2026 14:59 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Oh my. That's a game changer right there, that is.

17.01.2026 00:13 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Peak Halifax = knowing the AI picture is wrong and also knowing who the AI picture is being wrong with.

15.01.2026 20:35 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

You should ask if they can mildly (heavily?) sedate you, so that you can sleep through as much of the initial awfulness as possible.

09.01.2026 00:38 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Yes, you're right. I shouldn't have jumped straight to aggressive. I think I did so bc from this president's pov, telling him to stop or face consequences would be considered aggressive, due to him being a sociopath with no one checking his power, but you're quite right.

06.01.2026 17:50 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

If acting docile is a bad thing then presumably its opposite -- calling him out, ie acting aggressive -- is a good thing.

06.01.2026 17:31 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Explain how acting aggressive instead is positive.

06.01.2026 17:24 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0

Precisely.

06.01.2026 16:47 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

I want to know how your specific suggestion of standing up to the bully is logically more 'right' than NOT doing so, if the goal is to avoid the threat of reprisal.

06.01.2026 16:09 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

I know precisely how appeasement fared in the 1930s. I also know that 'standing up to Hitler' wouldn't have changed a damn thing for Czechoslovakia, Poland, Holland, etc etc. So apart from moral high ground, what's the logic?

06.01.2026 16:04 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

I don't 'need an explanation' on the theoretical level of principle. I want to hear your logic in relation to how 'not cowering' diminishes the actual threat on the ground. Maybe read less political science and more history.

06.01.2026 16:02 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Explain that logic. Not as a theoretical expression of your favourite playground principle, but in relation to an actual existential threat.

06.01.2026 15:54 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0