We are delighted to share @stephenmayson.bsky.social 's latest paper 'Lawyers and 'acting in the best interests of clients,'' which explores (amongst other timely issues) the tension between this duty & the public interest tinyurl.com/4sbbrkwc
@laws.ucl.ac.uk
#LegalEthics
#ProfessionalEthics
04.02.2026 18:08
👍 3
🔁 4
💬 0
📌 0
LinkedIn
This link will take you to a page that’s not on LinkedIn
We are delighted to share the recording of @stephenmayson.bsky.social UCL lunch hour lecture discussing lawyers and what it means (or should mean) to be acting in a client's best interests.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Pa5...
#ProfessionalEthics
#LegalProfession
#BestInterests
@laws.ucl.ac.uk
01.09.2025 13:14
👍 7
🔁 3
💬 0
📌 0
I am very honoured to be delivering the Faculty Office annual rule of law lecture for 2025. It is on 10 July in Westminster and will explore the rule of law and ethical integrity.
Details at www.facultyoffice.org.uk/wp-content/u...
27.05.2025 17:14
👍 5
🔁 0
💬 2
📌 0
A balanced and perceptive assessment. But isn’t part of the challenge the absence of a definitive and common view among regulators, professions and government about what the regulators are ‘supposed to do’?
02.12.2024 14:45
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Where is the Justice? – The Leaders Club
Leaders Club online session with former Lord Chancellor Alex Chalk KC, December 2 at 6pm. Not-to-be-missed session, Where is the Justice?, reflections on crucial changes that he sees as vital to restoring confidence in the justice system. Sign up here:
www.theleadersclub.org/item/where-i...
26.11.2024 22:52
👍 6
🔁 3
💬 0
📌 0
💭 Rethinking ethics training
“Ethics interventions have failed and will continue to fail because they are predicated on a false assumption: … “
#legalethics #iopsychology
20.11.2024 07:46
👍 4
🔁 1
💬 0
📌 0
Thanks Neil. @richardmoorhead.bsky.social has done the really heavy lifting; but between us we couldn’t have been clearer about nature and extent of problems, what is missing from current practice, and which way to go. We need a shift to “What is the right thing to do?” + regulatory enforcement.
18.11.2024 16:53
👍 3
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
This is a serious piece of legal scholarship by @stephenmayson.bsky.social which a 700-word news story cannot really do justice to. This and the recent Hamlyn Lectures from @richardmoorhead.bsky.social are sounding a claxon about legal ethics. Is the profession listening? Will it be made to?
18.11.2024 14:26
👍 10
🔁 5
💬 1
📌 1
The problem is that an evidence-based discussion cannot resist external ownership (because that evidence doesn’t exist). So blind prejudice and insult is the only option available in the abject quest to hide self-interested protectionism
15.11.2024 17:10
👍 2
🔁 1
💬 0
📌 0
I should say as well as the Post Office and Neuberger, we have guest appearances from a Mr Amersi, various banking scandals, enabling Oligarchs, Al Fayed, Weinstein, Green and top billing for former Times lawyer and his handling of the Nighthack disgrace. Let’s just cease to be subjective shall we?
31.10.2024 07:15
👍 3
🔁 2
💬 0
📌 0
“Are you proud to be a lawyer?”
Once, this was not a difficult question to answer. When I became a barrister in 1977, my answer would have been immediate and unequivocal. Like many of my generation, I was the first in the famil…
“Are you proud to be a lawyer?”. A new post, announcing the publication of the third report of the Independent Review of Legal Services Regulation (@IRLSR). It focuses on the meaning and implications for lawyers of ‘acting in the public interest’: wp.me/p1rQgF-1zy
30.09.2024 11:12
👍 3
🔁 2
💬 1
📌 0
If those lawyers were ‘proper professionals’, should they really need even a reminder - let alone a warning?
21.08.2024 19:32
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0