Core
30.05.2025 23:25
๐ 0
๐ 0
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0
Core
All it's missing is the RSVP button and a link to pitch in for their honeymoon
But have you seen their announcement page with TWO quotes from Ive and Altman each?
openai.com/sam-and-jony/
a screenshot of the AI labeler bot's toggle options for notifying you whether posts are AI assisted, AI modified, whether the user has an AI avatar or banner, uses occasional or frequent AI imagery.
An example of the tag in use, for your typical occupy democrats type. below the bio you see the label "User - Occasional AI Imagery"
Just a reminder that if you follow @aimod.social you can see which accounts are using AI, so you can do whatever you want with that information (and also tag accounts yourself). It allows you to customize and toggle what you want to be notified about which takes the form of a banner (see image 2).
Great piece! Your prototype makes me wonder if chat is a regression. Visual programming is so powerful in and of itself. It's as through scratch got it right all those years back. How has a chat based prompting improved your workflow?
Brain: pizza chips dino shaped nuggies 3 magnum minis
2 seconds later
Heart: I feel empty
2 mins later
Tummy: grr
CUT MY LIFE INTO PIECES this is a nice resort
It is entirely possible to eat all 3 at the same time. I can't tell you how i know this
I concede
Why eat one magnum when you can eat 3 magnum minis
Average
Shh we must nurture this
We contain multitudes
Figma sites is just a sack of divs
We are all cubes in the pattern
The wheel of cheese weaves as the wheel of cheese wheels
The Forsaken, very old cheese
Pattern aged parmesan,woven with water from the two rivers
Ca'arcan Cheddar Wheel, of the rind but not raised by the rind
technology always finds the next reproducible thing
art always finds the next irreproducible thing
but legends are old and most of the time dead
Electricity use in the United States is about three times higher than in the UK, so ChatGPT prompts are an even smaller piece of the pie. Ten searches per day would come to 0.09% of per capita electricity generation, while 100 searches would be 0.9%. Unless youโre an extreme power user, asking AI questions every day is still a rounding error on your total electricity footprint.
View Dr. Sasha Luccioniโs graphic link Dr. Sasha LuccioniDr. Sasha Luccioni โข 1stVerified โข 1st AI & Climate Lead @ Hugging Face, AI & Social Justice Chair (Abeona/ENS/OBVIA), Keynote Speaker, Featured on TIME AI 100 and BBC 100 Women (2024).AI & Climate Lead @ Hugging Face, AI & Social Justice Chair (Abeona/ENS/OBVIA), Keynote Speaker, Featured on TIME AI 100 and BBC 100 Women (2024). 3h โข 3 hours ago โข Visible to anyone on or off LinkedIn The "3 Wh per ChatGPT query" estimate is back and haunting my social media feeds! ๐งโโ๏ธ First of all -- that number is a back of the envelope calculation ๐ฏ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ผ๐ป ๐น๐ถ๐๐๐น๐ฒ ๐บ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ป ๐๐ถ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ด๐๐ฒ๐๐๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ธ. We don't know much about the model underpinning ChatGPT, how big it is, what hardware it's running on, nor how much energy it's using. ๐ก Second -- even if it is true, or close to being true, the ๐ฐ๐๐บ๐๐น๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐บ๐ผ๐๐ป๐ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ด๐ฒ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ ๐๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ถ๐ ๐ฝ๐๐๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ถ๐ป ๐ผ๐ป ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ด๐ ๐ด๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฑ๐ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐น๐ฑ๐๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฒ. We are switching out technologies that worked well for decades to new, shiny ones that use orders of magnitude more energy, and that comes with a cost. It's not just a matter of asking ChatGPT a question or 2, but also using genAI for searching the web, drafting emails, and generating images and video.๐ So please don't listen to people who are loudly proclaiming that this "isn't an issue". We don't know the answer to that question -- and actually, there is no single answer to that question, since every gram of CO2 and Wh of energy matters in the fight against climate change. ๐ What we need is: - More ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ป๐๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฐ๐ about the energy and GHG emissions of all in production AI models, right now. ๐ - More ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ฐ๐ผ๐๐ป๐๐ฎ๐ฏ๐ถ๐น๐ถ๐๐ and legislation to incentivize tech companies to choose more efficient models and truly renewable energy sources ๐ฑ - More ๐ฏ๐๐-๐ถ๐ป from the AI community (as opposed to this truly cโฆ
Another addition to the 'generative AI energy use is small when you compare it to something bigger so what's the problem' series, this most recently from Hannah Ritchie's substack.
This reply from @sashamtl.bsky.social is informative
archive.ph/wip/lNoKX
www.linkedin.com/posts/sashal...
"Tech is neutral" is really just the "guns don't kill people, people kill people" argument reused.
Sure, guns don't have agency. But they have what's called affordance - they are designed to make killing as easy as possible, which makes murder a viable* solution for a greater range of problems.
I keep catching strays from "technology is neutral" people, so let's set things straight.
1) Technology is not neutral, especially the subset of technology called "algorithms"
2) The form-factor that makes a technology into a tool is not neutral
3) How tools are productized is not neutral
[rant]
The future of web development is swinging back to basics.
CSS and HTML are the most exciting things in web development right now.
And don't worry about getting left behind because these features are here to stay. We're just getting started ๐ฅณ
#usetheplatform
It's pronounced boo-glay like beret but sharper
i actually think it's disgusting that slack automatically changes :) to ๐. they do NOT communicate the same meaning! you're embarrassing me!!
Who are you and why are you on my feed
