Shut up.
Shut up.
Seems Starmer is leading the Labour Party into oblivion, which to be honest is the best place for it.
The difference in the two conflicts is that one couldn't have been more deliberately provoked, and the other had no provocation at all. You can argue that Putin shouldn't have allowed Russia to be provoked, but you cannot argue with any real justification that Russia wasn't provoked.
Probably the US sponsored Neo-Nazi led, violent coup that ousted a democratically elected president a year before an election was scheduled.
Oh look. Russia can play that game too. Cue US hysteria with no one mentioning the word Ukraine.
Now that's a project.
"You can only comment on genocide when you are an expert at committing genocide" - Netanyahu, well probably. The problem with the current world is that satire is struggling to top actual events.
Fascism and the destruction of international law are being enabled by Western leaders who are so embedded in their Ukraine proxy war and (even more bafflingly subjugation to Israel) that they will burn down the country to save the village.
www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2026/03...
Israeli Nazi Ethnic Cleansing Barbarians are the epitome of evil! πΉπΊβ οΈπ€
The video of a United States Senator joining the violent removal of U.S. marine from a hearing and hideously breaking his arm in a door is an example of what has been unleashed in this country. Theyβre tapping in to get in on the violence.
And then he bragged about it on X later.
China and Russia are going to have to draw a red line at some point. They've sat back while their allies are picked off one by one, and done nothing. I'm not sure whether they believe it is pragmatism or it's arrogance, or something else, but the US has no boundaries, so they'd better wake up.
Terrorism like antisemitism is a word that has lost all meaning through weaponisation. Anyone now can be a terrorist without having once committed a terrorist act, or done nothing worse than those denouncing them as terrorists. It's just another sign of the descent into madness.
Its noticeable that not one of the great liberal European democracies, save for Spain, has put their face against Trump's illegal war of Israeli Aggression. All that pontificating about a rules-based world order, war crimes etc. Gone. Worse some have encouraged him including the EU and NATO.
So that's the claim that NATO is a defensive alliance finally debunked. What Rutte is saying here is that any country in NATO has a duty to aid US aggression anywhere in the world. NATO cannot survive this. It should not survive this.
When the US sunk the Iranian frigate in the Indian Ocean, they were aware that it was unarmed, defenseless and taking part in an invited military exercise.
Since China's Iran supplied energy will curtailed, Russia has no need to supply Europe. Putin would be really amiss if he didn't take the opportunity.
Again.
π
Not sure where you get 44% from, the figures I see are 27% with 29% unsure and 43% against. The WP poll that put approval at 39% was way out from others.
I've no doubt though that if Israel's war becomes successful though, the approval % will shoot up. For who cares about the dead kids?
I think at some point some people may cotton on to the game Trump is playing over Ukraine.. probably when Zelensky has sold him the last Ukrainian nail, Europe has cut the throat of its last industry and Russia is still hunkered down as it knows exactly what Trump is up to.
Yeah he will.. wait for the "we now have a legal basis" that can't be shown for security reasons.
Well they may have done, but this would be in connection to his primary role. The plain fact is, is that there is a vociferous effort to muddy the waters over who Epstein was working for. Not sure why, because it's not as if everyone now can't see who controls the WH.
Simple nope. There's only one country that Epstein has proven links to, along with Maxwell. He wasn't doing some general grifting for whoever paid, he had a role.
BREAKING: DOJ confirms that 47,635 Epstein files have been removed, per The Independent.
Epstein had clear links to Israel and Mossad, despite the attempts at distraction used by Israel's allies due to *checks note* some women trafficked from Russia (among a host of other places). I will bet the house though that Clinton meant all alleged foreign intelligence ties except Israel.
Nope
Things that didn't happen No 655
You know what I admire about Harris is that as VP she took a moral stance against the Biden's administration's enabling of genocide and protecting Israel from consequences so it could go on burning children alive. Oh wait.. no she didn't, she said not a single thing.
Yeah I have to admit, the White House being Israel's bitch began with Trump.. oh wait..
Since Israel demanded the US go to war with Iran, and since Harris was part of an administration that enabled genocide due to Israel's demands, then the answer is clearly Yes. Anyone who disagrees with this hasn't come to terms yet with who actually runs the US. You're in denial.