Thieves are being hampered from gorging on the world unrestrained oh no
@hwinoree
executive function specialist π§ humanist in New MexicoπΆοΈπ½ we are the heroes weβve been waiting for ππ» fight fascism, protect our home π fear is the mind killer π read more sci fi π
Thieves are being hampered from gorging on the world unrestrained oh no
You remember being a child or ignorant, not a golden time of great politicians. Good job growing up π
How about less stupid catchphrases to sell books and just making things people actually want that doesnβt destroy the planet?
Forgiveness for the unforgivable is something religion came up with to whitewash the abuses they inflict. It is morally imperative not to forgive crimes against humanity
Why are we building detention centers?
You do not have to support those who support child rapists and fascists. Not ever. Not under any circumstance. Itβs just a goddam game.
No, not everyone needs incentives not to rape or kill or hurt others. You are telling on yourself.
The stats come from the dept of justice, so go argue with them.
You are now arguing men (99% of rapists) need incentives not to rape. This is called rape culture and youβve embodied it perfectly.
99% of perpetrators are male. 2% are convicted. 80% are known to the victim. (US dept of Justice). Fuck you for making this about maga like itβs some stupid conspiracy against a group. The group is men. Men.
It is not distracting to identify perpetrators and name the patterns. Most rapists are ordinary men who the victims trusted. Those are facts. Justice is equal rights, not protecting βordinaryβ men whatever the gaslighting fuck that means.
Oh thank god youβve mentioned one woman so we donβt have a skewed perspective that the vast majority of sexual crimes are committed by men
Name one advanced physics problem solved
The political effects of X's feed algorithm https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10098-2 Received: 16 December 2024 Accepted: 4 January 2026 Published online: 18 February 2026 Open access β’ Check for updates Germain Gauthier,5, Roland Hodler?5, Philine Widmer35 & Ekaterina Zhuravskaya3,4,5 m Feed algorithms are widely suspected to influence political attitudes. However, previous evidence from switching off the algorithm on Meta platforms found no political effects'. Here we present results from a 2023 field experiment on Elon Musk's platform X shedding light on this puzzle. We assigned active US-based users randomly to either an algorithmic or a chronological feed for 7 weeks, measuring political attitudes and online behaviour. Switching from a chronological to an algorithmic feed increased engagement and shifted political opinion towards more conservative positions, particularly regarding policy priorities, perceptions of criminal investigations into Donald Trump and views on the war in Ukraine. In contrast, switching from the algorithmic to the chronological feed had no comparable effects. Neither switching the algorithm on nor switching it off significantly affected affective polarization or self-reported partisanship. To investigate the mechanism, we analysed users' feed content and behaviour. We found that the algorithm promotes conservative content and demotes posts by traditional media. Exposure to algorithmic content leads users to follow conservative political activist accounts, which they continue to follow even after switching off the algorithm, helping explain the asymmetry in effects. These results suggest that initial exposure to X's algorithm has persistent effects on users' current political attitudes and account-following behaviour, even in the absence of a detectable effect on partisanship.
A new paper shows that less than 2 months of exposure to Twitterβs algorithmic feed significantly shifts peopleβs political views to the right.
Moving from chronological feed to the algorithmic feed also increases engagement.
This is one of the most concerning papers Iβve read in awhile.
The story that Elon Musk committed voter fraud has gotten next to no coverage -- one of those things you can't make come up on a Google search.
But I think it's time for Dems to go on offensive abt right wing coddling of this immigrant interfering in our elections.
newrepublic.com/post/206857/...
Harris +6 not the pedophile
Testosterone is shady af
I canβt believe anyone would call criminals dodging questions as not βcuriousβ Jfc THEY DONT WANT TO FOLLOW LAWS!
It all adds up. And the whole of the Trump Redux evil is greater than the sum of its malignant parts.
There is today a convergence of criminalityβevery bad thing everywhere all at once: amoral men & women of great means and influence, in league with Epstein & his child sex trafficking network...
To every Epstein co-conspirator and sexual predator: Weβre coming for you.
Fuck off grifter
As if Iβd read msm owned by oligarchs to learn about capitulation in elite ed lol
yβall donβt know how mad we are at every failed institution for being so thirsty for power and undemocratic. They deserve to end
Why donβt we talk more about how LLMs can do the job of a CEO, but canβt pick a vegetable, fix a broken arm, build a house, ring up your groceries, or anything that makes 800% less than a CEO whoβ¦makes decisions based on data?
We found out during the pandemic who was essential already.
Nobody gets credit for interior thoughts not spoken out loud. These people are insane
And imagined fears at the expense of real problems
I'll take "elite southern enslavers and slave auctioneers in the 1850s" for $800, Alex.
Men invented hell and create it here on earth
Amazing!
Itβs called acting
Obviously anything can be abused but some things have speed and reach and larger impacts that make them a much greater threat and therefore require greater precautions against individuals misusing them. A stone can be dangerous but a nuclear weapon is much more so.
Does a camera have an embedded algorithm written by men that abuses people?