Hwi Noree 🫘's Avatar

Hwi Noree 🫘

@hwinoree

executive function specialist 🧠 humanist in New MexicoπŸŒΆοΈπŸ‘½ we are the heroes we’ve been waiting for 🌈🌻 fight fascism, protect our home 🌎 fear is the mind killer πŸ› read more sci fi πŸ”­

878
Followers
1,482
Following
210
Posts
16.11.2024
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Hwi Noree 🫘 @hwinoree

Thieves are being hampered from gorging on the world unrestrained oh no

05.03.2026 21:21 πŸ‘ 5 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

You remember being a child or ignorant, not a golden time of great politicians. Good job growing up πŸ‘

01.03.2026 15:33 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

How about less stupid catchphrases to sell books and just making things people actually want that doesn’t destroy the planet?

01.03.2026 14:49 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Forgiveness for the unforgivable is something religion came up with to whitewash the abuses they inflict. It is morally imperative not to forgive crimes against humanity

25.02.2026 16:26 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Why are we building detention centers?

25.02.2026 16:21 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

You do not have to support those who support child rapists and fascists. Not ever. Not under any circumstance. It’s just a goddam game.

25.02.2026 15:29 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

No, not everyone needs incentives not to rape or kill or hurt others. You are telling on yourself.

The stats come from the dept of justice, so go argue with them.

24.02.2026 21:52 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

You are now arguing men (99% of rapists) need incentives not to rape. This is called rape culture and you’ve embodied it perfectly.

24.02.2026 20:23 πŸ‘ 6 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

99% of perpetrators are male. 2% are convicted. 80% are known to the victim. (US dept of Justice). Fuck you for making this about maga like it’s some stupid conspiracy against a group. The group is men. Men.

24.02.2026 20:10 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

It is not distracting to identify perpetrators and name the patterns. Most rapists are ordinary men who the victims trusted. Those are facts. Justice is equal rights, not protecting β€œordinary” men whatever the gaslighting fuck that means.

24.02.2026 20:03 πŸ‘ 11 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Oh thank god you’ve mentioned one woman so we don’t have a skewed perspective that the vast majority of sexual crimes are committed by men

24.02.2026 18:22 πŸ‘ 123 πŸ” 2 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0

Name one advanced physics problem solved

23.02.2026 20:26 πŸ‘ 5 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
The political effects of X's feed algorithm
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10098-2
Received: 16 December 2024
Accepted: 4 January 2026
Published online: 18 February 2026
Open access
β€’ Check for updates
Germain Gauthier,5, Roland Hodler?5, Philine Widmer35 & Ekaterina Zhuravskaya3,4,5 m
Feed algorithms are widely suspected to influence political attitudes. However, previous evidence from switching off the algorithm on Meta platforms found no political effects'. Here we present results from a 2023 field experiment on Elon Musk's platform X shedding light on this puzzle. We assigned active US-based users randomly to either an algorithmic or a chronological feed for 7 weeks, measuring political attitudes and online behaviour. Switching from a chronological to an algorithmic feed increased engagement and shifted political opinion towards more conservative positions, particularly regarding policy priorities, perceptions of criminal investigations into Donald Trump and views on the war in Ukraine. In contrast, switching from the algorithmic to the chronological feed had no comparable effects.
Neither switching the algorithm on nor switching it off significantly affected affective polarization or self-reported partisanship. To investigate the mechanism, we analysed users' feed content and behaviour. We found that the algorithm promotes conservative content and demotes posts by traditional media. Exposure to algorithmic content leads users to follow conservative political activist accounts, which they continue to follow even after switching off the algorithm, helping explain the asymmetry in effects. These results suggest that initial exposure to X's algorithm has persistent effects on users' current political attitudes and account-following behaviour, even in the absence of a detectable effect on partisanship.

The political effects of X's feed algorithm https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10098-2 Received: 16 December 2024 Accepted: 4 January 2026 Published online: 18 February 2026 Open access β€’ Check for updates Germain Gauthier,5, Roland Hodler?5, Philine Widmer35 & Ekaterina Zhuravskaya3,4,5 m Feed algorithms are widely suspected to influence political attitudes. However, previous evidence from switching off the algorithm on Meta platforms found no political effects'. Here we present results from a 2023 field experiment on Elon Musk's platform X shedding light on this puzzle. We assigned active US-based users randomly to either an algorithmic or a chronological feed for 7 weeks, measuring political attitudes and online behaviour. Switching from a chronological to an algorithmic feed increased engagement and shifted political opinion towards more conservative positions, particularly regarding policy priorities, perceptions of criminal investigations into Donald Trump and views on the war in Ukraine. In contrast, switching from the algorithmic to the chronological feed had no comparable effects. Neither switching the algorithm on nor switching it off significantly affected affective polarization or self-reported partisanship. To investigate the mechanism, we analysed users' feed content and behaviour. We found that the algorithm promotes conservative content and demotes posts by traditional media. Exposure to algorithmic content leads users to follow conservative political activist accounts, which they continue to follow even after switching off the algorithm, helping explain the asymmetry in effects. These results suggest that initial exposure to X's algorithm has persistent effects on users' current political attitudes and account-following behaviour, even in the absence of a detectable effect on partisanship.

A new paper shows that less than 2 months of exposure to Twitter’s algorithmic feed significantly shifts people’s political views to the right.

Moving from chronological feed to the algorithmic feed also increases engagement.

This is one of the most concerning papers I’ve read in awhile.

19.02.2026 18:57 πŸ‘ 6409 πŸ” 3195 πŸ’¬ 159 πŸ“Œ 399
Preview
Turns Out There Was Voter Fraud in Georgiaβ€”by Elon Musk The state board of elections found Musk’s PAC sent prefilled ballot applications.

The story that Elon Musk committed voter fraud has gotten next to no coverage -- one of those things you can't make come up on a Google search.

But I think it's time for Dems to go on offensive abt right wing coddling of this immigrant interfering in our elections.

newrepublic.com/post/206857/...

20.02.2026 20:39 πŸ‘ 6606 πŸ” 3235 πŸ’¬ 154 πŸ“Œ 134

Harris +6 not the pedophile

13.02.2026 16:50 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Testosterone is shady af

12.02.2026 19:15 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

I can’t believe anyone would call criminals dodging questions as not β€œcurious” Jfc THEY DONT WANT TO FOLLOW LAWS!

11.02.2026 01:55 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

It all adds up. And the whole of the Trump Redux evil is greater than the sum of its malignant parts.

There is today a convergence of criminalityβ€”every bad thing everywhere all at once: amoral men & women of great means and influence, in league with Epstein & his child sex trafficking network...

10.02.2026 13:51 πŸ‘ 557 πŸ” 218 πŸ’¬ 4 πŸ“Œ 27
Video thumbnail

To every Epstein co-conspirator and sexual predator: We’re coming for you.

10.02.2026 23:41 πŸ‘ 337 πŸ” 113 πŸ’¬ 20 πŸ“Œ 2

Fuck off grifter

10.02.2026 15:02 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

As if I’d read msm owned by oligarchs to learn about capitulation in elite ed lol

y’all don’t know how mad we are at every failed institution for being so thirsty for power and undemocratic. They deserve to end

10.02.2026 14:51 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Why don’t we talk more about how LLMs can do the job of a CEO, but can’t pick a vegetable, fix a broken arm, build a house, ring up your groceries, or anything that makes 800% less than a CEO who…makes decisions based on data?

We found out during the pandemic who was essential already.

09.02.2026 23:24 πŸ‘ 6 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Nobody gets credit for interior thoughts not spoken out loud. These people are insane

05.02.2026 21:57 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

And imagined fears at the expense of real problems

04.02.2026 14:44 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

I'll take "elite southern enslavers and slave auctioneers in the 1850s" for $800, Alex.

04.02.2026 02:48 πŸ‘ 962 πŸ” 78 πŸ’¬ 22 πŸ“Œ 2

Men invented hell and create it here on earth

01.02.2026 14:55 πŸ‘ 13 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Amazing!

31.01.2026 00:01 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

It’s called acting

29.01.2026 13:33 πŸ‘ 7 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Obviously anything can be abused but some things have speed and reach and larger impacts that make them a much greater threat and therefore require greater precautions against individuals misusing them. A stone can be dangerous but a nuclear weapon is much more so.

28.01.2026 00:11 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Does a camera have an embedded algorithm written by men that abuses people?

27.01.2026 23:48 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0