KarlPurcellBehavEcon's Avatar

KarlPurcellBehavEcon

@ef110econ

Applying behavioural science to help make people happier, healthier, and wealthier with @irrationallabs. All views are personal. Retweets are not endorsements.

756
Followers
187
Following
80
Posts
13.11.2024
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by KarlPurcellBehavEcon @ef110econ

Old man post incoming: if you are someone who enjoys talking about ideas or lively debate, grab your university years by the horns! One of the greatest gifts of your uni years is the selection effect of being near other smart people who share your interests! #reminiscing

05.03.2026 05:37 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

It is one of the weirdest divides, I speak to two companies in the exact same industry and one has been using AI for the past 18 months and the other has a committee that has to approve every use case individually and talk about how AI companies will train on their data.

05.03.2026 01:41 πŸ‘ 43 πŸ” 3 πŸ’¬ 4 πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Do You Agree? Do You Strongly Agree? The Effect of the Number of Response Categories on Response Processes and Verification of Substantive Hypotheses Abstract. This study investigates how the number and labeling of response categories in survey scales affect respondent behavior, psychometric properties,

This is consistent with earlier psychometric work that suggests 5-7 is the best response scale options, but good to see that the finding holds up in contemporary research. Also, good to see that labeling scales whether anchored or not has little impact on findings. academic.oup.com/ijpor/articl...

02.03.2026 00:21 πŸ‘ 116 πŸ” 40 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 2

Not making any sort of claims or trying to imply anything about this one certain study. But for these type of ai studies, I think it's even more important for open data practices to be in place since the exact wording of prompts, system setup etc matter. Replication should be faster too and expected

27.02.2026 18:52 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
A Guide to Which AI to Use in the Agentic Era It's not just chatbots anymore

Every few months, I write an updated, idiosyncratic guide on which AIs to use right now.

My new version has the most changes ever, since AI is no longer just about chatbots. To use AI you need to understand how to think about models, apps, and harnesses. open.substack.com/pub/oneusefu...

18.02.2026 01:50 πŸ‘ 129 πŸ” 30 πŸ’¬ 5 πŸ“Œ 8

We spent months training grad student RAs and GPT-5 mini still beat them by a lot

11.02.2026 17:12 πŸ‘ 24 πŸ” 6 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

We have a new pre-print! πŸ“πŸ–¨οΈ

We find that conversing with a disagreeing LLM helped improve people's inaccurate predictions!

osf.io/preprints/ps...

Let me tell you all about it:

12.02.2026 09:13 πŸ‘ 10 πŸ” 3 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Yeah no shade your way. I retweet in the same way.

11.02.2026 17:17 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Given your other posts lately on blue Monday and stuff, it was interesting to see this without the caveat of "hey this may or may not be a real thing".

But yeah realistically it's just me reading another blog post at 4am while watching the baby and getting cranky.

11.02.2026 16:06 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

As I said originally, it doesn't seem crazy that there could be some small effect. But this post is not evidence for one in my view.

11.02.2026 13:42 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

More thoughts: 6) no statistical tests here. 7) no time series modelling 8) effect for any actual business would be tiny!! 9) February Mondays include presidents Day in US, how is that accounted for? 10) no comparison to other holiday Mondays 11) no comparison to other Mondays for last minute PTO

11.02.2026 13:42 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

I feel so many ways about this. 1) seems highly believable. 2) seems like one of those cutesy findings that with more poking into data could disappear. 3) this company only cover 34,000 very non representative companies. 4) effect size is small. 5) this company wants a splashy marketing story

11.02.2026 13:33 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Introducing β€œPretend Battleship”: you’re told where all the ships are but then have to play like you never got that information. Could you do it? And what would your performance reveal about your understanding of your own mind? A joy to be part of this creative project led by @matanmazor.bsky.social

10.02.2026 20:40 πŸ‘ 30 πŸ” 8 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 1
Post image

Large Language Models have shown both remarkable reasoning ability, and significant reasoning failures.

Research by @psong1.bsky.social et al has categorized this phenomenon in a clear taxonomy to explore how and why the performance is so variable:

buff.ly/hI7DYYN

11.02.2026 11:35 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Thrilled to share our latest paper, out now in Science Advances! We explored the development of cooperative behaviors β€” fairness, trustworthiness, forgiveness, & honesty β€”Β  across five societies, culturally contextualizing them & seeing how they correlate. (1/5) www.science.org/doi/full/10....

07.02.2026 15:09 πŸ‘ 126 πŸ” 44 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 3

Looks very promising! Thanks for sharing it here

06.02.2026 05:08 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
The Lasting Effects of Working while in School: A Long-Term Follow-Up (Forthcoming Article) - This paper provides the first experimental evidence on the long-term effects of work-study programs, leveraging a randomized lottery design from a national program in Uruguay. Participation leads to a persistent 11 percent increase in formal labor earnings seven years after the program, driven by a 4 percent increase in the monthly probability of being employed and a 6 percent increase in monthly wages. Effects are significantly larger for men, while remaining positive for women. The program is highly cost-effective, outperforming most job training programs and reaching levels comparable to early childhood investments.

Forthcoming in AER: Insights: "The Lasting Effects of Working while in School: A Long-Term Follow-Up" by Mery Ferrando, NoemΓ­ Katzkowicz, Thomas Le Barbanchon, and Diego Ubfal.

30.01.2026 09:52 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
How can the use of different modes of survey data collection introduce bias? An introduction to mode effects using directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) Abstract. Survey data are self-reported data collected directly from respondents by a questionnaire or an interview and are commonly used in epidemiology.

Users of survey data, lovers of DAGs, and general methodological enthusiasts, gather round!

I'm so excited to share this new paper, joint work with my brilliant colleagues @rjsilverwood.bsky.social, @pwgtennant.bsky.social, and Liam Wright.

🧡

28.01.2026 12:12 πŸ‘ 73 πŸ” 30 πŸ’¬ 4 πŸ“Œ 7

Very important work

19.01.2026 17:06 πŸ‘ 13 πŸ” 6 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
A Taxonomy of AI Experiments We introduce a taxonomy of artificial intelligence (AI) experiments. Our taxonomy produces four types of AI experiments: conceptual AI experiments, stylized AI

πŸ₯³ Stoked to share that our paper with Christina Strobel, "A Taxonomy of Al Experiments," has been accepted at the Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics!

Huge thanks to Christina for collab and to the reviewers for extremely helpful feedback!

papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

#EconSky

16.01.2026 16:47 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
When the Effects of Informational Interventions Are Driven by Salience – Evidence from School Parents in Brazil (Forthcoming Article) - Do informational interventions work because they lead subjects to merely update beliefs in the right direction or, to a large extent, because they increase the salience of the ...

Forthcoming in AEJ: Economic Policy: "When the Effects of Informational Interventions Are Driven by Salience – Evidence from School Parents in Brazil" by Guilherme Lichand, Nina Cunha, Ricardo A. Madeira, and Eric Bettinger. www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=...

14.01.2026 14:37 πŸ‘ 5 πŸ” 2 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
The Poverty of Moral Foundation Messaging Prominent scholars have argued that reframing political positions and issues in terms of moral foundations that appeal to conservatives or liberals can attract more individual-level support for tho...

I need everyone in the political communications world who found the moral foundations reframing approach promising (which includes me) to read this paper

It doesn't replicate in new research. It just doesn't work.

www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....

08.01.2026 15:53 πŸ‘ 57 πŸ” 19 πŸ’¬ 4 πŸ“Œ 9
Post image

Excited to announce that this year's Advances with Field Experiments conference will take place at the University of Chicago on September 17-18, 2026.

@johnlist.bsky.social and I will send out a call for abstracts early in the Spring.

bfi.uchicago.edu/events/event...

@katymilkman.bsky.social

09.01.2026 14:35 πŸ‘ 10 πŸ” 2 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 1
Post image

Spotify limit old music so you listen to new things

09.01.2026 16:01 πŸ‘ 131 πŸ” 9 πŸ’¬ 6 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

The AEA has posted eight "Recent Developments" lectures exploring highly topical issues in economics, presented by the best scholars in the field:

www.aeaweb.org/conference/w...

Well worth a watch!

10.01.2026 18:38 πŸ‘ 18 πŸ” 6 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 2
Post image

"Survey incentives can worsen bias! Randomized incentives help detect & account for nonresponse bias. Methods using both incentives & reminders outperform existing approaches."

New paper by Dutz, Huitfeldt, Lacouture, Mogstad, Torgovitsky & van Dijk

www.restud.com/selection-in...

#EconSky #REStud

08.01.2026 14:48 πŸ‘ 23 πŸ” 15 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 4
Preview
Better artificial intelligence does not mean better models of biology Deep neural networks (DNNs) once showed increasing alignment with primate perception as they improved on vision benchmarks, raising hopes that advances in artificial intelligence (AI) would naturally ...

Published @cp-trendscognsci.bsky.social with @drewlinsley.bsky.social & @tonyfeng.bsky.social: As vision models scale to human/superhuman accuracy, they’re becoming worse models of primate visionβ€”benchmark engineering isn’t neuroscience. @carneyinstitute.bsky.social @browncopsy.bsky.social

05.01.2026 15:33 πŸ‘ 45 πŸ” 20 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 1
Preview
An AI Expert Challenges an AI Skeptic, with Ethan Mollick

Had an interesting, hard interview with @adamconover.net on his podcast. I think he is a great example of a smart AI skeptic.

My main messages were that AI is a really big deal, it has good & bad impacts, and that, by sitting things out, skeptics can’t guide use. open.spotify.com/episode/5cFK...

01.01.2026 09:37 πŸ‘ 94 πŸ” 12 πŸ’¬ 13 πŸ“Œ 7

This is a very special conference which you should absolutely consider attending if your research is at the intersection of behavioral science and AI

See you in Berlin!

23.12.2025 09:41 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Non-paywalled version:

osf.io/preprints/ps...

22.12.2025 18:32 πŸ‘ 11 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0