i would die for the aberrant stem tetrapod Tanyka amnicola
@bigendian
hey its the guy from twitter who keeps coming up with increasingly worse genders. i cant be bothered to center the lil octopus sry. special interests are pharmacology and defending weird pornography. ancom tendencies. he or she. 33. Bad Checksum @ Balmung
i would die for the aberrant stem tetrapod Tanyka amnicola
hate it when my nervous system that has been finetuned for a billion years goes โฎโฮฉโeiฮธdฮผโฮฑโจโโ ?โฮยจโยฌฮโ๎ โจโค for 1 millisecond and i spill carcinogenic chemicals all over me
New post! Solar storms are damaging and expensive, are a tail risk for catastrophic harm, and can be averted straightforwardly and cheaply (only we haven't done so).
www.lesswrong.com/posts/ghq9Ew...
this
in general, mutations in genes on the x chromosome are more likely to cause noticeable issues because a lot of people only have one x chromosome, so there isn't a backup working copy of the gene available like most. so probably a lot of polygenic disabilities have more x linked genes associated
In an adversarial information environment, you should only believe what you can verify yourself. Right now, I believe in my living room
i dont like cellular automata research because i know one of the rulesets is going to be isomorphic to the feed from a camera that doesnt exist which follows me around 24/7
@norvid-studies.bsky.social
so 80 girls in a school got blown up by an illegal war against Iran started cuz Israel has the balls of the US president in a vice grip after a Mossad-directed honeypot for pedo billionaires heavily implicated him and his friends in a child sex trafficking ring, with congresspeople reading unredact-
archive of our own
I point you all to this interactive fractal tree of life itโs so enjoyable
onezoom.org/life.html
why the big tiddy pfp tho
I wrote a whole blogpost arguing that social agents should not talk about their inner lives. Problem: I keep finding it rhetorically interesting when they do.
you may think acute management of the zipper-entrapped penis sounds bad, but i bet chronic management of the zipper-entrapped penis is even worse
don't click on the rest of this nsfw warning
paywalling important public safety info smh
unimaginably dire thing i saw IRL the other day
it is already possible, right now, to get 100tok/sec out of 100 watts of air-cooled local inference, and the output is surprisingly good
LLM architecture gains will compound against improved silicon over the next five years to produce serious leverage, WHICH WORKERS CAN OWN OUTRIGHT
every time I see people glazing the luddites I get so fucking mad
the magic of the Muppets is that there are two fourth walls. they constantly break the one that reminds the audience they are performers. they NEVER break the one that reminds the audience they are puppets. this dynamic is the key to their entire comedy style
Jeff Bezos makes enough money to fully fund this literally every two minutes.
i find that the phenidates put me in more of a bad mood than the amphetamines, not sure if that correlates with anxiety though. also not sure if the levo/dextro structure activity relationship is the same between amphetamines and phenidates
It would cost literally zero dollars not to say this. It's actually completely free of charge not to be a horrifically vicious transphobe. It's actually super easy not to be a horrific bigot towards groups you're a part of, most people do it all the time no problem.
in the future, if you can find a stimulant that's less norepinephrinergic that might help prevent anxiety - vyvanse/dextroamphetamine is good for this, as are some of the illicit ones
I still remember learning in middle school that MB/s and mb/s were not the same thing, and feeling very betrayed that no one had ever told me this or seemed to understand it. the fact that everyone's understanding of this fundamental thing was off by 800% and they never noticed blackpilled me a bit
โSummoned an unusually powerful claude instanceโ
if you're willing to share the code i would love to try this
Real risks of having a single "anti-AI" coalition (covering jobs, kids, slop, existential risk, environment) that can only agree on a full halt to AI as a remedy. Not only is that unlikely, but it undermines the desire to make policies that channel AI to good uses or that mitigate specific harms.
alright this thread does make some interesting points about opsec