Super, je suis en effet preneur
Super, je suis en effet preneur
Super intéressant. On voit que les "investisseurs privés" sont surreprésentés dans les métropoles, et notamment la région parisienne, est-ce que vous avez calculé la part du parc de logements qu'ils détiennent dans ces territoires ?
oui c'est en effet ça, j'avais trouvé mais bonne idée de le préciser si le détail intéresse d'autres personnes
très intéressant, avez-vous le lien pour accéder directement au graphique ?
I have an article in the Guardian today on how finance capitalism is wreaking havoc on housing across Europe www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
And important to keep in mind: “residential property investors seem to look for a way to increase rents and/or price when selling. One interviewee (4) expressed this very clearly: “as a developer or as an investor you look at that market and you can say ‘okay what can I do to drive rents?’”.”
Also new evidence regarding investors strategies after 2022 (and the evolution of interest rate)
Geography of investments is also discussed (strong difference there too)
2 markets perceived as “highly regulated” by investors (France and Sweden residential markets) but with strong difference regarding the share of the private rental stock being owned by them: we try to understand why there is such a difference.
Really happy about this work with Jennie Gustafsson (@jiegson.bsky.social)
mau.diva-portal.org/smash/record...
Perfect way to start the summer with a new publication part of the Studies in Housing and Welfare’s working paper series: Variegated Experiences of Rental Housing Financialization: Residential Property Investors in France and Sweden, with @matthieuvogt.bsky.social: urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=...
(which would facilitate access to property for all)
(ii) T. Piketty suggests inheritance for all, which seems like an interesting idea.
Two things that come to mind: (i) how hard is rent control in Ireland? Because rent control may aim to reduce rent prices or "just" to limit rent increases. In a market where rents are already very high, the latter seems a bit inadequate to me.
They also came first in the 35-49 (more tightly), where the shares of tenants and owners with mortgage are high (I didn’t see any data on the vote according to tenants/owner status).
But SF came first in the 18-34 years old, where the share of tenants is the highest. And in these age groups FF and FG results are low.