Being buddy buddy with Epstein makes him wrong about this?
Being buddy buddy with Epstein makes him wrong about this?
Sounds like they may not know what either of those things mean.
In any case, we do not need to "encourage investment". What we need is to maintain and improve our real resources. Money is not a constraint on government, the real resources that make up our economy are.
News Flash: More than just apathetic leftists didn't vote. There were apathetic liberals, and apathetic conservatives too.
I'm Canadian, so I can't speak to whether I have influence, but it is undeniable that the Democrats' consistent weakness have served to elevate Trump.
Yes, we are going to insist on criticizing them. Because if we simply stop criticizing, they will start or continue to believe they are beyond criticism. People challenging Carney to do more are completely in the right, just as (I guess) you are for defending him; it takes many people.
I strongly doubt this person does. If they did, they wouldn't be on this site.
They're only saying that Obama's imperfections were what enabled Trump to capitalize on it, and Biden's imperfections were the same.
Trump was able to win twice due to complacency and failure to message against him.
That's hardly the point. Leftists can walk and chew gum, you know.
To deny Obama's (albeit small comparatively) role in bringing Trump is the same as saying "we haven't learned anything", much in the same way Clinton brought Bush, or Carter brought Reagan.
Unless it's critical of the Trump administration, then it requires an impossible level of scrutiny and new rules outright.
Not even hyperbolic, he's literally just not Christian.
If only the Republican party had half the awareness of George Bluth.
There's always money in the banana stand.
So that's why his hairline receded. It couldn't defend its territory.
Are we talking lento wag or a presto wag?
Was it a warning to not be in front of vehicles, or a reminder to be in front of vehicles?
You can't really trust just an internal memo's message without the context it was delivered in, after all.
Yeah, I misspoke, had bombs on the mind. I'm not saying that taking action against him wasn't justified, just that I'll hardly give him props for taking down BL when there are far more civilian casualties that had no reasoning.
Ah, so it's just standard operating procedure then. All is well, I suppose.
Ah yes, because bombing one person of interest that you *accidentally* trained and funded years ago excuses the many (wildly unnecessary) civilian deaths.
But it's okay, he got his Peace Prize on schedule, right?
Cultivated so much peace with the drone strikes, after all.
This is why Matching Funds is important.
Okay, so push for another candidate in Maine to win over Susan Collins.
The first step was likely rescinding Chevron's license to operate in Venezuela last year.
This op has likely been in the works for about a year.
Fentanyl? He must have misspoke. He meant "I fancy oil".