An honourable mention also goes to: Brian Smith "John Locke on Historical Injustice: The Redemptive Power of Contract" (CRISPP, Vol. 27 issue 5).
@crispp
CRITICAL REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL SOCIAL AND POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY (CRISPP) Eds. Richard Bellamy (UCL/Hertie), Annabelle Lever (Sci Po) Patti Lenard (Ottawa) and Margaret Moore (Queens) https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/fcri20/current
An honourable mention also goes to: Brian Smith "John Locke on Historical Injustice: The Redemptive Power of Contract" (CRISPP, Vol. 27 issue 5).
The winner of the 2025 CRISPP Essay Prize goes to: Patrick Lenta "Can Transitional Amnesties Promote Restorative Justice?" (CRISPP, Vol. 27, Issue 5). Details of the prize, the jury's report, and free access to the article, can be found at the following link:
www.tandfonline.com/journals/fcr...
Details of my book launch are now available - everyone welcome. It will be hybrid for those not in London and recorded.
www.ucl.ac.uk/laws/events/...
You can read a free chapter of Defending the Political Constitution here:
fdslive.oup.com/www.oup.com/...
Get a 30% discount on my new book Defending the Political Constitution with the code on this flyer: fdslive.oup.com/www.oup.com/...
CRISPP editor has a new book out:
Delighted to announce a hybrid event to launchThe Cambridge Handbook of Constitutional Theory: ed Richard Bellamy and Jeff King
UCL 13 Oct 2025, 18:05 β 19:30, followed by a wine reception.
Event details and how to book an on line or in person place β are here
www.ucl.ac.uk/laws/events/...
I have a new paper out online in @crispp.bsky.social: I argue that a focus on domination can help us better understand a renewed politics of working time - a reduction in work, the right to disconnect, and challenging employer authority over free time.
www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
I discuss its themes - in some ways part of a new book project - with Alan Renwick at: uncoveringpolitics.com/episodes/sho...
New article now out and on open access - βTruthfulness, pluralism and the ethics of democratic representationβ is now published in Volume 27, Issue 3 of The British Journal of Politics and International Relations and is available at doi.org/10.1177/1369...
Have read some of these papers and they were excellent @rbellamy.bsky.social
CRISPP 28.5 is now on line. A special Issue on Democratic Ethics and Voting edited by Annabelle Lever & Attila MrΓ‘z
β many articles open access β available at:
www.tandfonline.com/toc/fcri20/c...
Pleased that my exchange on Paul Tucker's stimulating Global Discord in now available OA on @crispp.bsky.social
www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
and reply:
www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
Even the Guardian in my view fails to underline how worrying this is β¦. The BBC treats such news as if we should be rejoicing and heading for the beach. No wonder climate change isn't being taken seriously.
www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025...
In defense of voting method publicity
Aylon Manor
Criminalising (cubes of) truth: animal advocacy, civil disobedience, and the politics of sight
Serrin Rutledge-Prior
Meaningful work, nonperfectionism, and reciprocity
Caleb Althorpe
Cancelling fiduciary excuses
Robert E. Goodin
Data-owning democracy or digital socialism?
James Muldoon
The multidimensional recognition of religion
Simon Thompson & Tariq Modood
Do global justice theorists need to alter their normative focus to accommodate changing empirical circumstances?
Teppo Eskeline
Article
Data based radicalism? data usage and the problem of critical distance in contextual and empirical political theory
Nahshon Perez
Can business corporations be legally responsible for structural injustice? The social connection model in (legal) practice
Barbara Bziuk
The latest issue of CRISPP is now online:
www.tandfonline.com/toc/fcri20/c... - Muldoon on digital socialism,Thompson and Modood on religious recognition, Goodin on excuses, Althorpe on Meaningful work, Eskelinen on global justice, Perez on Data based radicalism and more ....
Engaging with the neon-machiavellian justification of lying and the Neo-Platonic notion of the 'noble' lie to argue for the need for political truthfulness
Great to see this symposium on my & Anne Barnhill's and Josh Milburn's recent monographs on food justice being published in @crispp.bsky.social! Many thanks to the guest editor, Tom Bailey, and to all the commentators!
I'm thrilled to share that @crispp.bsky.social has started to publish a nine-article symposium on my Food, Justice, and Animals and @matteobonotti.bsky.social and Anne Barnhill's Healthy Eating Policy and Political Philosophy.
First up: This is Tom Bailey's introduction to the symposium.
(1/7)
Labour has to change tack and stop aping Reform on immigration and public spending before it is too late. Not only is it morally wrong, but also the strategy of growing the economy will also fail to materialise given Trump light policies have major economic costs that undermine any such recovery.
On why aping Reform is not only bad politics but also bad economics
In a week when Australia followed Canada in giving the neo-Trumpist parties an electoral drubbing, it was disappointing to say the least to see the Trump adjacent Reform do so well in the recent local elections and to win the Runcorn by-election.
Great blog on free speech and social media www.medialaws.eu/the-evolutio...
Great post graduate teaching opportunity at UCL
ABSTRACT Joseph Carens is well known for his defence of a general human right to freedom of interstate migration. Michael Blake, by contrast, has argued that, precisely because of the existence of human rights, states have the presumptive right coercively to prevent migrants from entering their territorial jurisdiction; as such, there is no human right to migration. Blake argues that, because states have a moral obligation to protect and fulfil the human rights of all persons in their territory but not elsewhere, when migrants enter a stateβs territory, they impose new obligations on it that it did not previously have. He argues, moreover, that because to impose obligations is to impose new burdens, we have a right to refuse to have new obligations imposed on us without our consent. I show that Blakeβs argument misconstrues the logical structure of conditional human-rights obligations, and that, once properly construed, it becomes clear that immigrants do not impose new human-rights obligations on states in virtue of their entry.
New from Arash Abizadeh, in a symposium on the work of Joseph Carens (RGCS Lecture Feb 24) in CRISPP (ed. by Richard Bellamy, RGCS Lecture Nov 24).
@abizadeh.bsky.social @rbellamy.bsky.social
"The burdens of jurisdiction and the alleged right to exclude unwanted migrants"
doi.org/10.1080/1369...
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy: Vol 28, No 3 (Special Issue) Relational Equality and Intergenerational Justice, edited by Devon Cass and Andre Santos Campos is now available on line β the Introduction on open access.
www.tandfonline.com/toc/fcri20/c...