Seriously, anyone checked in on her?
28.02.2026 15:44
👍 32
🔁 8
💬 5
📌 0
Seriously, anyone checked in on her?
NGL, my cold dead heart overflowed when he pulled out the flags of the Americas at a moment when the USG is trying to divide and conquer. 😭 😭 👏🏾 👏🏾
all credit to great thinkers such as @bcfinucane.bsky.social
Thanks to Bloomberg Law for inviting my thoughts on presidential powers and Venezuela.
news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/...
Expect someone in the administration may have dusted off this 1989 OLC opinion.
www.justice.gov/olc/opinion/...
The left says that oligarchs have bought our democracy. They're wrong—oligarchs have bought our republic.
Normally, military members enjoy broad First Amendment rights to share their views on social media or otherwise, but recent guidance following the Charlie Kirk assassination changes that. @frankrosenblatt.bsky.social examines the consequences of this new guidance and what it means in practice.
Thanks to Glenn for the interview and spotlight on our work with The Orders Project
Signing out for now from Jackson, Mississippi. Hope we’re back on Bluesky soon. #firstamendment
Yes please. Thinking of the military law experts who know nothing about genocide but think that any topic relating to armed conflict gives them the final word.
I used to be a U.S. Army JAG at Fort Bliss, Texas during the war years. Now the base is being transformed into an immigration hub. My take on habeas rights for migrants detained on U.S. military bases:
globalmjreform.blogspot.com/2025/08/do-m...
Still in the process of organizing faculty exchanges if any other associate deans out there want to coordinate, let me know!
My latest book chapter includes:
- why the propensity prohibition in evidence law makes sense
- the impact of other evidence like race and appearance that's not gatekept by evidence rules
- why Lt Kendrick is more interesting than Col Jessup in "A Few Good Men"
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
Marko sets it all out if anyone is interested www.ejiltalk.org/no-recognizi...
SEALS FOMO
I always knew he would leave
Missiles and Messages: Characterizing the Use of Force between Iran and Israel
opiniojuris.org/2025/07/25/m...
Typical Tesla earnings call: "It's true that revenue is down 30% but did you know that we're actually a [something futuristic] company." Stock price soars
How about, if you’re not a subject matter expert, particularly on int’l criminal law, you just refrain from opining on this matter in the NYTIMES?
Also, getting wrapped around the axle on the G word is a distraction from the necessity of stopping the slaughter.
www.nytimes.com/2025/07/22/o...
Yesterday was... interesting. globalmjreform.blogspot.com/2025/07/one-...
Thanks so much, Michael!
This is useful. Thank you, Diane!
Starting 4pm eastern today
Best law review article about state constitutional law? There was a thread on the topic heee about a year ago that I can’t find. Thanks!
❗HIRING ❗ Join me at UGA School of Law! We're hiring 4-5 tenure-track or tenured positions. Priorities include torts, Ks, bankruptcy, environmental law, property, *international law* & secured transactions.
Send letters of interest & cv/resume @ lawhiring@uga.edu. Feel free to reach out w/ ??s.
Impunity does not change illegality. As some remedy, the world becomes smaller for those who engage in atrocities, including aggression. GWB once cancelled a trip to Switzerland over concern of possible arrest concerning past US torture practices.
Without basis in an AUMF I’d say this is less constitutionally firm than other interventions but agree it’s not “clearly unconstitutional.” As for illegality, domestic amnesties shouldn’t change the label.
Saying it’s not illegal is different from whether any court challenge in the U.S. is likely to succeed. That doesn’t make it legal. See Pinochet
UN Charter. Crime of aggression. Why risible?