π π΄New Stream on Tuesday!π΄π
We've arrived to the Mangrove area, which is the only place we've not visited yet :) I'll see what's around there and then I'll clear sidequests!
Lupus juice challenge
π π΄LIVE NOW!π΄π
Remembering this piece from Nyanners' Tumblr. I think, overall, this should be the general stance that the community grows into.
Visibility and time will get us there, but progressive & independent creatives in the medium do need to set these things clear from the onset.
π π΄Stream on Tuesday!π΄π
I am very excited to continue building the ship!Taking materials from the ocean and setting up the vessel is very relaxing -w-
#dredge #vtuber #envtuber
π π΄Stream over! π΄π
We fished a lot... and now I have more money than I really know what to do with LMAO ^^
π π΄LIVE NOW!π΄π
π π΄Stream tomorrow!π΄π
We're going back at sea. Honestly I'm not scared at all! It's been super relaxing so far LOL. Let's see if that changes... -w-
#dredge #vtuber #envtuber
π π΄Stream over! π΄π
It was a lot of fun! Thank you for attending, we played Dredge in the end LMFAOOO.
π π΄LIVE NOW!π΄π
I am fine dropping the subject here though.
I don't think this idea that there are no liberal/leftist rebuttals to the tolerance of drawn CSAM is smart, so I challenge it where I see it if I have the spoons.
There's things that are made to gratify and things that are gratifying because they're beautiful.
There's no substitute for emotional intelligence here. Ultimately though, most people would be able to tell between a porn mag and a photo mag, from their context cues.
Would it be that bad to keep that stuff in a journal then, if it's personal exploration which could be an asset to harm if it was published?
We can accept either if they're discussed, but it's different if they're __gratified__, especially if their gratification requires the production of abuse material that can become an asset to harm.
Bear by Marian Engel is *anything* but an unchallenging piece of art meant to gratify the senses. I think you do not understand what porn is and why it's regulated differently.
You're being very self-satisfied in reaction to what I imagine you know is most people's opinion on the subject.
Depends. Fictional depictions of murder that exist for the purposes of representing or commenting on reality, we generally value.Stuff for people who get off on the idea of murder, less so. It's part of why we try to lock mass shooter manifestos.
We don't compare gore porn to Crime and Punishment.
No, I disagree. There's always a line you can draw β even among things that are fine and completely legal, we have taboos and faux-pas in the interest of pro-social behaviours.
We can always make exceptions of the exceptions make sense. We always do, in fact.
There's usually depictions of things we generally agree to censor and it's fine β like drawn CSAM, revenge/AI porn or McCollough effect pictures that can damage your eyesight.
I think at minimum we have a right to use our own free speech to object to the things we find objectionable.
π π΄Stream tomorrow!π΄π
We will adventure into a sea of fish that scream like people... or so I've heard -w-
#umigari #vtuber #envtuber
www.youtube.com/watch?v=E9eT...
Articles 1 and 2 of the OPSC: Article 1 States Parties shall prohibit the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornogra- phy as provided for by the present Protocol. Article 2 For the purpose of the present Protocol: (a) Sale of children means any act or transaction whereby a child is transferred by any person or group of persons to another for remuneration or any other consideration; (b) Child prostitution means the use of a child in sexual activities for remuneration or any other form of consideration; (c) Child pornography means any representation, by whatever means, of a child en- gaged in real or simulated explicit sexual activities or any representation of the sexual parts of a child for primarily sexual purposes.
Map of OPSC signatories.
My definition of CSAM comes from the Optional Protocol on the Sale of Children, Child Prostitution and Child Pornography.
Nearly every UN member agrees with the OPSC and is bound to comply with it according to international treaties.
Sexual violence against women & children is a reality we need to discuss more - but pornography is meant to gratify and validate the senses, not create spaces for reflection.
There's an abyss of difference between Boku no Pico and The Bluest Eye.
Anime has always been a shelter for the non-conforming; it's no surprise. Some forms of imagination, regardless of how repugnant they might be, are still legal up until they present a danger.
Problem is, drawn CSAM is CSAM - so the danger is they can't exist w/o the production of abuse material.
Imo, it's very odious and objectionable how much loli/shotacon is accepted in some #VTuber spaces; a lot of them pose as "progressives" as to normalise drawn CSAM.
Personally I won't indulge this lot, nor wish have them near any spaces I am in.
I hope you can respect that boundary and leave π
It's my turn on the Xbox get off CoD I want to play Halo.
If you guys see me getting discourse brain again please post the Red Angry Bird at me.
sketches by spindle of the character Kitt, a human woman with orange hair and two black pompoms (hair clips). On the left is her pulling her top to reveal her side boob. On the right is her sitting and looking backwards
quick Kitt sketches warm ups, been a while since I've drawn her
