To me the fact that you basically can’t use the phone while charging it, and that it charges slower and is way more inefficient, makes it a SNOOZE
To me the fact that you basically can’t use the phone while charging it, and that it charges slower and is way more inefficient, makes it a SNOOZE
Wow I can put my phone on the “charging dock” and wake up to a charged phone. Wowie, you know. Geez Louise I can’t wait for that to be me
I am big into the tech review space. And one of the weirdest things they talk about is how good phones are at wireless charging. I’m sure someone uses this. Maybe it’s good if you’re driving with phone? To me it is a gibberish feature
I think the ChatGPT use of “it’s not ___, it’s ___” is more distinct from human use of that phrase than people make it out to be. Because ChatGPT is always making some stupid metaphor that communicates zero information. “It’s not a drizzle, it’s a flood”
it's just impossible to overstate how much Pete simply saying "No war with Iran" would be an improvement. He don't even NEED to bring up the killing of Iranians! "The psycho president has once again done something straightforwardly illegal and stupid" would probably suffice!
I guess I am acting here like Pete is opposed to the war, which he plainly isn't. But then shut up lol
ironically it makes the case for war so much stronger. because the conservatives who advocate for it speak in lofty terms about the necessity of regime change and the importance of destroying Iranian weapons. And the dems just say, welp, gas might get expensive for a while or something
i think basically that I wouldn't care about the war if it was just a matter of gas prices going up by a dollar right now and six american soldiers dying. This sort of rhetoric just makes it so easy to not give a shit, it encourages total political apathy
You’re right da times should kill the president
I believe this is the sort of joke the Times is making, that this extremely likely and obvious outcome is presented in such blase, confused terms by the president who launched the war
"I guess the worst case would be we do this and somebody takes over who's as bad as the previous person," he said. "Right, that could happen? We don't want that to happen. It would probably be the worst, you go through this, and then in five years you realize you put somebody in who's no better." Right, that could happen.
I like when the New York Times is even slightly nasty
to what extent does I Saw The TV Glow contain bad stuff, and can we call "being trans" the protagonist's fault
I am trying to think if anything from Charlie Kaufman works. Like Anomalisa and I'm Thinking of Ending Things both give horror to some extent. And the horror in both (in most Kaufman stuff) is the myopia of the protagonist
hmm yeah, but then by that standard, I think most movies wouldn't count tbh. like is the Need To Not Be In Debt the antagonist in Fargo? it's a fine line we draw
oh and the substance for sure. okay I will stop :-)
Smile 2???
I think the directors most obsessed with things being the protagonist's fault are the Coen Brothers. I guess Fargo and No Country aren't horror, but they are a little lol. Hmmmmm. Frankenstein
I feel like Cronenberg likes that, I can't think of anyone besides the protagonists doing much in The Fly or Dead Ringers. I think Saint Maud is this way. I don't know if Companion is a horror movie, but that probably counts. Many many twilight zone episodes
Operation Epic Fury is without a doubt the name of some kind of furry callout video where a number of furries get mad at a bad furry
I'm more talking about this sort of thing
www.theguardian.com/world/2026/f...
I am not talking about the citizens of the nations of Western Europe. This would be a bit crazy, given the fact that Donald Trump is the president of my country
I do give some leeway on this point, is the thing. I don't think countries outside the US spend as much time worrying about the motives of the american government. But when you're condemning retaliatory attacks and acting like this all made perfect sense, it really comes off as parodic
I really think they probably also want regime change in Iran and basically don't care how that happens
I just don't care about their stupid economic summits or their stupid doomsaying anymore. Team USA all the way, should be the mantra of Western Europe
Just a few weeks ago, all these European powers spoke of the threat that the US now presents to Europe. They talked about the possibility of Trump attacking Greenland, like it was an imminent and existential danger. Now Trump unilaterally bombs Iran and they all fall in lockstep
I think maybe the Rules Based Order Mark Carney was mourning in that speech was “America not tariffing Canadian goods”
Pardon my ignorance, what did he do with them? Like he threw out the nuclear deal and continued sanctions but I don’t remember anything else
Something about the way the hands get outstretched in the second act really makes them feel like feet
Idk experts this one seems a little far fetched
I like it because it usually makes the conspiracy theorist’s past claims out to be shockingly moderate. “Yeah, that whole Epstein stuff? Seems like there’s a there there. We should look into it!” Said the conspiracy theorist four years ago in their fantasy life