CheeseheadTV's Avatar

CheeseheadTV

@cheeseheadtv

Devoted to Green Bay Packers fans, worldwide.

7,373
Followers
15
Following
2,578
Posts
09.01.2024
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by CheeseheadTV @cheeseheadtv

Preview
Packers trade DT Colby Wooden to Colts for LB Zaire Franklin The Packers are reportedly trading defensive tackle Colby Wooden to the Colts for linebacker Zaire Franklin. Franklin, who was selected by Indianapolis in the seventh round of the 2018 NFL Draft out of Syracuse, turned in the best season of his eight-year career in 2024. He led the NFL with 173 tackles while also recording two interceptions and forcing five fumbles. Last season, Franklin played in all 17 games for the Colts, recording 125 tackles, two sacks and a forced fumble. Colby Wooden’s time in Green Bay comes to an end just as he was supposed to be on the Packers annual tailgate tour. The former fourth round pick made 87 tackles during his time in Green Bay.  Filed Under: Packers News   PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Tags: green bay packersZaire Franklin Like 0 points
07.03.2026 20:41 👍 20 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 5
Preview
Five Potential Players the Green Bay Packers Could Realistically Target in Free Agency Free agency will start this week as the new league year gets under way. The Green Bay Packers have some clear needs which they could address in the opening stages of free agency. While I don’t expect a huge, top of the market signing, the Packers could add a few moderately priced players during the first few days of free agency. Here are five players the Packers could realistically target in free agency at positions of need. Cornerback Roger McCreary, Los Angeles Rams The Packers have a need at cornerback. They currently lack a number one cover corner and need more depth and talent at the position. Roger McCreary was a second-round pick by the Titans in 2022. The former Auburn star stands 5’11” and weighs 190 pounds, so he does still fit the Packers usual parameters at the position. He started as a rookie but was sent to the Rams midway through the 2025 season. He played primarily in the slot in Tennessee but played the boundary with the Rams. The Packers always value versatility and McCreary would give them that. He also plays the run well and tackles well. He can blitz the quarterback and has recorded four career sacks. McCreary just turned 26 last month so his age fits in the range the Packers prefer for free agents. He will likely earn $10-13 million per year on the market. Center Cade Mays, Carolina Panthers With Elgton Jenkins looking like a cap casualty and Sean Rhyan about to hit free agency, a starting center is a big need for the Packers. Cade Mays would fit with the Packers move to bigger and stronger offensive linemen that started last season with the additions of Anthony Belton and Aaron Banks. Mays stands 6’6” and weighs 325 pounds. He is a better pass blocker than run blocker. The Tennessee alum is strong but struggles to get to the second level on run blocks. Mays started 27 games over four seasons with the Panthers since they drafted him in the sixth round in 2022. He will turn 27 in April.    Center Luke Fortner, New Orleans Saints Luke Fortner wouldn’t provide as much size up front, but he’s more athletic and able to run block better than Mays. Fortner stands 6’4” and 307 pounds. The Jaguars selected him in the third round in the 2022 NFL Draft. The former Kentucky star started for Jacksonville for his first two NFL campaigns. In 2025, he was traded to the Saints and started 10 games for them. Fortner will turn 28 in May. He will likely cost more to sign than Mays but may be a better all-around center. Linebacker Nakobe Dean, Philadelphia Eagles If Quay Walker departs as a free agent, the Packers will need a new starting linebacker to replace him. Nakobe Dean would be an interesting gamble for the Packers. The former Georgia star is undersized at 5’11” and 231 pounds. He also has trouble staying on the field, having missed significant time in two of the three years he’s been a starter with the Eagles. But when he’s on the field, Dean can be very effective. He recorded four sacks in 10 games for the Eagles in 2025 and recorded seven tackles for loss. The 25-year-old has good speed and is adequate in coverage, but boy can he get after the passer and make plays. Would the Packers take a chance on Dean at an expected $10 million AAV? If it works, Dean and Edgerrin Cooper could give the Pack two very dynamic playmakers at linebacker. If he misses significant time due to injury, this could be wasted cap space. Cornerback Montaric Brown, Jacksonville Jaguars Montaric Brown would be a lower-cost option at cornerback for the Packers. The former Arkansas star started his NFL career as a seventh-round pick but became a starter in 2024, his third NFL season. Brown has good size and broke up a total of 20 passes in the last two seasons combined. Opposing quarterbacks completed just 55.9 percent of their passes when throwing to receivers covered by Brown last season according to pro-football-reference.com and had a quarterback rating of just 74.3. He would also cost the Packers an estimated $6 or $7 million per year to sign. He also excels in zone coverage which new defensive coordinator Jonathan Gannon emphasizes. Filed Under: FeaturedGil Martin   PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ You can follow Gil Martin on Twitter @GilPackers __________________________ NFL Categories: Green Bay PackersTags: Green Bay Packers2026 NFL Free AgencyBrian Gutekunst Like 0 points
07.03.2026 16:06 👍 6 🔁 1 💬 2 📌 0
Preview
Cory's Corner: Three Free Agents The Packers Must Re-Sign The Green Bay Packers have built their recent success on patience and internal development rather than flashy spending in free agency. The NFL free agency negotiation window opens March 9 and as the Packers approach the 2026 offseason, that philosophy will again be tested. Several contributors are set to hit the market, and the front office will need to balance continuity with the reality of the salary cap. If Green Bay wants to maintain stability around quarterback Jordan Love, three players should be priorities to bring back: Rasheed Walker, Romeo Doubs and Quay Walker. Rasheed Walker may end up being the most expensive decision of the group, but that doesn’t make it any less necessary. Starting left tackles are among the most valuable commodities in the NFL, and the open market tends to drive their price even higher. Walker is projected to command somewhere in the neighborhood of $19–$20 million dollars per year if he reaches free agency. That number may feel steep, but protecting the quarterback has always been a priority in Green Bay. Walker has developed into a dependable pass protector and has grown within the Packers’ offensive system. Letting him walk would force the team to either overpay another free agent or gamble on an unproven replacement through the draft. Neither option is as appealing as keeping a player who already understands the system and has proven he can handle the job. Walker’s growth hasn’t gone unnoticed inside the building. Packers coach Matt LaFleur praised the young tackle’s progress, saying, “Rasheed has done a really nice job for us. He’s continued to improve, and you can see the confidence growing every time he’s out there.” For a team that prides itself on developing offensive linemen, Walker represents another success story worth keeping. Walker is ranked as the No. 3 Packers offensive lineman behind Zach Tom and Elgton Jenkins according to Pro Football Focus, but the seventh rounder’s run blocking grades haven’t been consistent. Romeo Doubs presents a different type of financial decision, but an important one nonetheless. The young receiver has become one of Jordan Love’s most trusted targets, particularly in critical situations. While he may not always produce the flashiest statistics, Doubs consistently shows up on third downs and in the red zone, where reliability matters most. His market value is expected to land somewhere in the $11–$14 million per year range, a reasonable price for a starting receiver in today’s NFL.  The Packers have invested heavily in a young receiving corps, but chemistry between quarterback and receiver is something that can’t simply be replaced overnight. Keeping Doubs in Green Bay would preserve continuity in the passing game and give Love a dependable option as the offense continues to develop. Even though Doubs was given a one-game suspension by the team for skipping practice in Oct. 2024, his role as the best route runner and best hands in the wide receiver room couldn’t be more clear.  “Rome is out there competing and doing everything that we need to see from him,” said LaFleur.  The most complicated decision, however, involves linebacker Quay Walker. The Packers chose not to exercise Walker’s fifth-year option, which would have guaranteed him roughly $14.7 million for the 2026 season. At first glance, that decision raised questions about whether the organization truly sees Walker as a long-term piece of the defense. In reality, declining the option may have simply been a financial strategy. The fifth-year option would have locked Green Bay into a fully guaranteed one-year salary at a high number for the position. By declining it, the Packers gave themselves the flexibility to negotiate a longer-term deal that spreads the cap hit across multiple seasons. Walker is expected to command something in the $12–$15 million per year range on the open market, which would still make him a significant investment but potentially one that is easier to structure under the cap. More importantly, Walker has developed into one of the defense’s most important players. His speed, range, and physicality allow him to impact both the running and passing game. Replacing that kind of presence in the middle of the defense would be difficult and risky. The Packers don’t need a dramatic roster overhaul this offseason. What they need is stability. By investing in Rasheed Walker, Doubs, and Quay Walker — even at rising market prices — Green Bay would be committing to the players who already form the backbone of the roster. Sometimes the smartest move in free agency isn’t chasing new talent. It’s making sure the right players never leave.   Filed Under: Packers NewsFeaturedGreen Bay PackersCory JennerjohnCory's Corner   PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Cory Jennerjohn is a graduate from UW-Oshkosh and has been in sports media for over 15 years. He was a co-host on "Clubhouse Live" and has also done various radio and TV work as well. He has written for newspapers, magazines and websites. He currently is a columnist for CHTV and also does various podcasts. He recently earned his Masters degree from the University of Iowa. He can be found on Twitter: @Coryjennerjohn __________________________ NFL Categories: Green Bay PackersTags: Rasheed WalkerRomeo DoubsQuay Walker Like 0 points
07.03.2026 12:36 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0
Pack-A-Day Podcast - Episode 2781 - Packers Free Agency News, Reports, & Rumors! Join Andy Herman as he breaks down the latest transactions and rumors in NFL Free Agency and of course discusses the crazy situation with Rashan Gary. Don't miss it!!!     Filed Under: Pack A Day Podcast   PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Andy is a graduate of UW-Oshkosh and owns & operates the Pack-A-Day Podcast. Andy has taken multiple courses in NFL scouting and is an Editor for Packer Report. Andy grew up in Green Bay and is a lifelong season ticket holder - follow him on Twitter @AndyHermanNFL! __________________________ NFL Categories: Green Bay PackersTags: Pack-A-Day PodcastPackers podcastPacker PodcastGreen Bay Packers podcastgreen bay packer Like 0 points
07.03.2026 10:39 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
The Packers Max Restructure McKinney To Get Under The Cap   Jeremy Fowler of ESPN has reported that the Packers restructured Xavier McKinney's contract and Overthecap has posted the numbers.  Per Overthecap, the Packers reduced McKinney's $4.25M base salary to his minimum salary of $1.215M, a difference of $3.035M.  The Packers added 3 void years and converted the $3.035M plus McKinney's $8.5M roster bonus ($11.535M total) into a signing bonus.  The move provides $9.228M in cap relief.  McKinney will have cap numbers of $9.697M in 2026 and $24.908M in 2027, which would make him a prime candidate for an extension or some other move to reduce his cap number in 2027.  This move should get the team to around $5M under the salary cap limit once the team receives credit for Jenkins forfeiting his $700K workout bonus when he held out last spring.  Their cap space will be reduced by the deal that Chris Brooks received.  The Packers previously signed running back Chris Brooks to a 2 year, $4.85M contract, but the details are not yet known.  A cap number between $1.85M and $2M for 2026 would not be surprising.  Brooks would offset someone currently with a $1.005M cap number, so it is likely a net reduction of $860K to $1M.  Bottom line, the Packers are roughly $4M under the limit.  Exercising the three ERFA players would reduce their cap space to perhaps $3.7M.  The big question is why now, and why McKinney?  It may be that the Packers are trying to negotiate a pay cut with  Gary and the sides are waiting to see if the other blinks.  Now that they are under the cap, the Packers could wait until July to release Gary, when many teams will have spent their cap space.  I suppose Gary could issue Instagram announcements and write tweets and then delete them.    Maybe they need to keep Gary on the roster into the new league year so they can release him with a June designation.  That would increase the cap savings from $10.98M to $19.5M while dumping dead money into 2027.   That might mean that Gutekunst wants to take a big swing in free agency, perhaps with a player who does not count against the compensatory draft pick system.    Perhaps they are trying to trade Gary.  After Gute got a fourth round pick for Clinton-Dix, I have been a little more cautious about what I write as to the feasibility of trades.  That said, I do not think anyone would trade for Gary given his $18M base salary and $1.5M more in workout and game active bonuses.  The team might decide to pay part of Gary's salary to make him more attractive to an acquiring team, and perhaps get better draft compensation.  It seems reasonable to me that Gary would prefer to be able to choose his own team (as an unrestricted free agent), hence the Instagram and X posts.   It also appears as though the Packers are going to wait until the new league year to do something with Elgton Jenkins.  The Packers will still need another $15M in cap relief by the start of the season and a straight release of Jenkins provides $19.5M.  Yes, the Packers could restructure or release other players, but I confess I think his release is a foregone conclusion. Some folks think the Packers will have a lot of cap space in 2027, and it should be much improved.  OTC shows Green Bay $82M under the cap (while assuming a healthy $26M increase to $327M), but that is for just 29 players under contract. There will be 51, and the extra players will average at least $1M per player. Think more like an effective cap space of $52M. That is a nice enough number, but remember that the cap was $182M less than 5 seasons ago.  OTC does assume that Gary will be on the team in 2027 with a cap number of $31M, although he would have some dead money if he were cut.  Even if the team has $70M to $80M is cap space for 2027, the free agent list is loaded.  It includes: Christian Watson, Jayden Reed, Wicks, Kraft, Nixon and Valentine, Van Ness, McDuffie, Wyatt, Wooden, and Karl Brooks. That's both starting perimeter CBs, the top 3 DTs, the top 3 WRs, and the top tight end.  Edgerrin Cooper, Bullard, and Evan Williams all become eligible for extensions, though GB will still have team control.  I don't know who the center is going to be in 2026, much less in 2027.  Hitting on some draft picks always helps a team's cap situation, both in the upcoming draft and from previous drafts.  The Packers also need to get these personnel decisions right along with the corresponding financial consequences.     Photo courtesy of Mark Hoffman, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel/USA Today         Filed Under: FeaturedGreen Bay PackersJames Reynolds   PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ NFL Categories: Green Bay PackersTags: salary capRoster ConstructionGreen Bay Packers Like 0 points
07.03.2026 04:34 👍 7 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
Packers Daily: Rashan Gary Is (Almost) Gone Listen to the podcast here: Find all of my daily podcasts here. Filed Under: FeaturedAaron Nagler#PackersDailyPacker Fan Podcasts   PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Tags: Green Bay PackersRashan Gary Like 0 points
06.03.2026 22:52 👍 6 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 1
Preview
Ask Maggie: A Cheesehead TV Combine? Free agency is almost here and it’s Russ Ball’s time to shine. I always love the surprises that come along with free agency, seeing where the big names land and how they alter team needs heading into the draft. Now let’s jump in.  “Hey Maggie! I enjoyed your chat with Andy that ran this past week! Good stuff! You guys both talked about the influence Matt had (has) on any QB2 selection. Obviously we all know Brian has final say, but do you think Matt might have more input now with the success he’s had with Malik? Or perhaps it’s from his overall experience through the years? Or maybe he's always had more say than most of us think? Thanks!” - Jim Thanks for listening! It's always fun to pop back on Pack-A-Day and talk with Andy. I would expect Matt to have plenty of input on what type of quarterback he’s looking for that fits his offense. And I think the Packers will absolutely look for a veteran backup. They may draft a quarterback on day three or sign a priority free agent to have another arm during training camp/preseason, but I would expect QB2 moving forward to be another vet.  I think the Packers (and the rest of the league) have figured out how vital it is to have a reliable QB2. The Brett Favre ironman days are over, and it’s getting harder for any player to last a full 17-game regular season. Malik Willis is going to get some money in free agency because he showed he can lead an offense and win football games, even if the sample size remains small. The Ravens went 2-0 with Tyler Huntley as their starting quarterback. They were 0-2 in Cooper Rush’s two starts. Mac Jones went 5-3 with the 49ers and kept the team in playoff contention until Brock Purdy was able to come back. There are obviously a lot of factors beyond just QB wins, but it certainly seems like if you’re a team that plans to compete, you don’t have the luxury of developing rookie quarterbacks anymore. If you are, you’re probably giving up a spot on your 53-man roster to stash a third quarterback, or you’re hoping they don’t get poached from your practice squad.  And this isn’t to say all veteran backups are created equal. We obviously have seen plenty of examples of veterans not working out. But there’s certainly been an emphasis across the league on finding reliable backups. If you’re a team that isn’t close to competing, like the Dolphins, then you’re more inclined to have a player like Quinn Ewers as your backup so you can see if there’s talent there worth developing or potentially competing for a starting job.  Maybe Desmond Ridder is a guy LaFleur really likes. He’s under contract through 2027, so he’d provide a one-year option. Otherwise Trey Lance (25), Kenny Pickett (27), and Zach Wilson (26) are a few younger backup options with starter experience for Gutekunst to consider. I’m sure LaFleur has a sense of who would be best-suited to run his style of offense, and I think Gutekunst will listen to those opinions. I can’t imagine Gute making any roster decision, especially on offense, without getting LaFleur’s perspective and approval.  “Would you prefer the Packers sign two upper-level free agents, 4 mid-level free agents, or 8 veteran fringe starters/depth pieces?” - Andrew  This is a fun what-if. I’m going to assume that upper-level free agents include the most expensive players on the market, which would likely keep them off Green Bay’s radar unless a lot changes between now and March 11. We did see the Packers restructure Xavier McKinney already, though, so they’re making moves to get into a better cap situation. It looks like that one move was enough to get Green Bay out of the negatives heading into the new league year, but we’re still expecting them to do quite a bit of restructuring.  Now, if I could get Tyler Linderbaum and Jamel Dean as my two upper-level free agents? Sign me up. Honestly, I’d be satisfied with just Linderbaum. Fixing the offensive line would solve just about every struggle the offense had all season. But that would be pie in the sky, and it’s hard to see Gutekunst having the capital (financial or otherwise) to keep swinging for the fences in terms of big-name free agents. Especially after bringing in Micah Parsons.  I’m going to avoid the eight veteran fringe starters/depth pieces solely because if they’re depth pieces, I want those snaps to go to the young players that are developing. It’s why I think the Packers should keep only one guy between Rashan Gary and J.J. Enagbare, not both. Give some of those snaps to Barryn Sorrell.  So that leaves the most realistic option (to me) as four mid-level free agents. I’m not sure where you view Roy Lopez in terms of mid-level vs fringe starter, but he’s someone I earmarked last week in the mailbag. Mike Hilton could be a really interesting option as a slot corner if the Packers are intent on playing Nate Hobbs outside. Maybe I’m kind of squishing your last two categories together and taking swings on four players, knowing I can’t roster eight, and if a few of them aren’t starters for me in 2026, that’s to be expected. There are a lot of interesting names available at cornerback this offseason to challenge Valentine immediately for playing time. Chidobe Awuzie and Roger McCreary are just a few of the names I’d be on board with from the list.  If I could have the Packers sign four players at mid-level contracts going into the draft, here’s the positions I’d want them to sign: center, nose tackle, cornerback, inside linebacker. Knowing I had addressed those positions in at least some capacity, I’d feel a lot better letting the board fall to me. None of those additions would prevent me from drafting a player at that same position, but I’d at least have some insurance going into the draft.  “If they held a combine for writers at Cheesehead TV, what would the drills be? Which would you dominate?” - Tony I think this question is designed to get me in trouble. I am incredibly competitive so I would just go in assuming I'd perform well in all of the drills. But typing has got to be one, right? Words per minute? How about an agility drill where you have to setup a podcasting station with a microphone and ring light? We can replace the 40-yard dash with the fridge dash. You have to spring up from your desk, run to the fridge, grab a beer, and get back to your laptop. And instead of the Wonderlic we could bring back Packers Trivia from the pandemic. Remember Packers Trivia? That was a blast. Aaron if you’re reading this, bring back Packers Trivia. Which would I dominate? I’m not answering that. I’ll just say this. Rumor has it, there’s a post-it note on Jersey Al’s desk that says “Maggie Loney no matter what.”  That’s it for this week! By the time the mailbag goes live next week, we may already have some new faces in Green Bay. Free agency will have begun and quite a few Packers will become former Packers. Let’s chat about all of it. As always, send your questions to chtvmailbag@gmail.com.  Filed Under: FeaturedMaggie Loney   PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Maggie Loney is a writer for Cheesehead TV and podcaster for the Pack-A-Day Podcast and Pack's What She Said. Find her on Twitter at @MaggieJLoney. __________________________ NFL Categories: Green Bay PackersTags: NFL Combinefree agencyMatt LaFleurBrian Gutekunst Like 0 points
06.03.2026 15:32 👍 7 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 2
Preview
One Bart Starr Football Card’s Incredible Journey I assumed I would never see it again. And then, suddenly, my first-ever Green Bay Packers football card – which I had procured when I was 4 – was back in my hands. It’s not in good shape; I marveled at its shine and colors when I was a child, but I didn’t know who that Bart Starr fellow was, even though I watched football every Sunday with my Dad. Ken Stabler and Joe Namath were my guys in those days. And so, the card went into my toy box, where the edges wore down over time, and it developed a crease across the bottom left corner. But when I started getting more seriously interested in collecting sports cards, around age 10 or 11, I dug the card up and added it to my collection. Then, when I was 12, I met a new kid at my school named Greg. We became pretty fast friends and, as middle-schoolers sometimes do, we put together what to us was a blockbuster trade in the neighborhood of the Packers’ Micah Parsons deal last year: All of my football cards for all of his baseball cards. We rode our bikes to meet at a convenience store to make the swap. I was already a Packers fan and had begun developing my appreciation for Starr – who was at the time Green Bay’s head coach – but I completely forgot the card was in there when we made the trade. So off it went. Fast forward literally 48 years. That new kid became my closest friend, and we were having our usual weekend session of beers and conversation recently with our respective dogs. He had mentioned a few times in recent times that he had been sorting through his football cards. He had kept those cards I had traded him in a lockbox over the decades. And one day it dawned on me that maybe, just maybe, that sentimental memory that holds possibly my first step toward Packers fandom, was still in there. So I asked him. And he later texted me a picture of it – I recognized the crease immediately. The card isn’t worth much as a collector’s item, but it’s a bonafide 1970 Topps glossy insert, part of a subset designed to stand out from the regular series. And it was the first Green Bay Packers connection of my life. After high school, Greg joined the U.S. Air Force. Over his 20 years of service, he had lived in Missouri, Texas, Oklahoma (twice) and even Germany, moving back to the Louisville area some 25 years ago. I can’t believe I nearly forgot I had ever owned the card, but every few years I would think about it and wonder if it still existed somewhere, maybe in some kid’s toy box collecting new creases.  And without a second thought, Greg happily gave the card back to me – a football card I literally pulled from a pack that some relative (probably my grandmother) picked up for me at the grocery store.  (An aside: Greg’s running joke was that I had ripped him off in the trade, so when we got to high school, I bought a collection from a friend. That collection included a 1971 Terry Bradshaw rookie card – Greg’s favorite player as a kid – and I gave him that as a make-good so he would stop complaining. All those baseball cards he handed over are long since gone, but he still has that Bradshaw, and it’s now worth hundreds of dollars. Bastard.) That Starr would later become my all-time favorite Packer is not lost on me. Was it that bright, beautiful card that initially hooked me? Or was it that, when I started playing on a youth league team called the Packers, I then started paying close attention to what the actual Green Bay Packers were doing?  In fifth grade, I remember buying a book at school (yes, for you old-timers, it was the Scholastic Book Club) called “Great Quarterbacks of the NFL,” and Bart was the subject of the final chapter in the book. It described his kind, respectful demeanor and his leadership, and that reminded me of my father and grandfather. I know for a fact that played a role in my now owning three Starr jerseys and a replica Super Bowl I ring, along with other collectibles I probably don’t need. Whatever it was, I am incredibly grateful my best friend not only saved that card for nearly half a century, but also gladly gave it back to me. Maybe that Terry Bradshaw rookie was a good move, after all. Filed Under: FeaturedKevin Gibson   PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Kevin Gibson is a professional writer and author based in Louisville, Ky. He's also a former sports writer who covered high school, college and professional sports, a Packers shareholder and a fan since 1975. Even John Hadl couldn't break him. Follow him on Twitter: @kgramone __________________________   NFL Categories: Green Bay PackersTags: Bart StarrGreen Bay PackersToppsPackers history Like 0 points
06.03.2026 12:32 👍 8 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0
Pack-A-Day Podcast - Episode 2780 - A Closer Look at Cam Achord + Bob Harlan Passes Away On today's show, Andy Herman takes a closer look at new Special Teams Coordinator Cam Achord, and discusses the legendary life of former Packers President and CEO Bob Harlan who passed away on Thursday. Plus a look at the latest free agency news surrounding the Packers. Enjoy!!!     Filed Under: Pack A Day Podcast   PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Andy is a graduate of UW-Oshkosh and owns & operates the Pack-A-Day Podcast. Andy has taken multiple courses in NFL scouting and is an Editor for Packer Report. Andy grew up in Green Bay and is a lifelong season ticket holder - follow him on Twitter @AndyHermanNFL! __________________________ NFL Categories: Green Bay PackersTags: Pack-A-Day PodcastPackers podcastPacker PodcastGreen Bay Packers podcastgreen bay packer Like 0 points
06.03.2026 11:29 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
Former Packers President Bob Harlan passes away at 89 Former Green Bay Packers President and CEO Bob Harlan passed away Thursday, March 5, following a brief illness. Harlan was 89. “The Packers family was saddened to learn of the passing of Bob Harlan,” said Packers President and CEO Ed Policy. “Bob was a visionary leader whose impact on the franchise was transformational. From his inspired hiring of Ron Wolf to turn around the club’s on-field fortunes to his tireless work to redevelop Lambeau Field, Bob restored the Packers to competitive excellence during his tenure and helped ensure our unique and treasured flagship NFL franchise was on sound footing for sustained generational success. On the field, the Packers enjoyed a resurgence under Harlan’s guidance, posting the league’s best overall record, 152-88, from 1993-2007, and returning the Lombardi Trophy to Green Bay with a victory in Super Bowl XXXI. The successful period also included 13 straight .500-or-better seasons (1992-2004), an impressive accomplishment in the free agency era and the team’s best stretch since the 1930s and ‘40s. Off the field, the crowning achievement of Harlan's tenure — the $295 million redevelopment of historic Lambeau Field — was ushered in at the beginning of the 2003 season and has stood as a key component of the team’s financial strength for ongoing success. Harlan and his wife, Madeline, were deeply involved in the greater Green Bay community through the years, serving on many boards and donating time to many charitable causes. Both had been the recipient of multiple honors, both on a local and state basis, including Bob being honored three times by his alma mater, Marquette University, in 1997. In 2007, Harlan penned his autobiography, Green and Golden Moments: Bob Harlan and the Green Bay Packers.                                                                                 It is impossible to overstate how important and instrumental Harlan was in the Packers 30+ years of success they have experienced after decades of futility.    Filed Under: Packers NewsFeatured   PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Tags: Green Bay PackersBob Harlan Like 0 points
05.03.2026 22:54 👍 38 🔁 5 💬 3 📌 9
Preview
Packers Daily: McKinney Restructure Gets Green Bay Ready Listen to the podcast here: Find all of my daily podcasts here. Filed Under: Aaron Nagler#PackersDailyPacker Fan Podcasts   PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Tags: Green Bay PackersXavier McKinney Like 0 points
05.03.2026 22:36 👍 9 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
Are There Any Vets Packers Could Offload For Picks?  The Green Bay Packers are set to enter the 2026 NFL Draft with a smaller-than-usual haul of draft picks. They, of course, are heading into this draft without a first-round pick for the first time since 1986, thanks to the Micah Parsons trade. They have ended drafts without first-rounders before, but that was due to trade-backs (2008, 2017) to acquire more picks. Not having a first-round pick this year and next year ramps up the pressure to hit on other picks in the draft. The best way to do that is to give yourself as many bites at the apple as possible. The Packers, as we speak, possess a pick in rounds 2–7, with the possibility of gaining some more compensatory picks once they are announced. They are currently projected to receive a 7th-round pick for both Josh Myers and Eric Wilson signing with the Jets and Vikings, respectively. What if the Packers wanted to acquire even more picks? Without giving up draft capital to move up, maybe they would entertain trading some players for additional draft picks. It’s twofold as well. These players either have not lived up to heightened expectations, either as a starter or with an increased role on offense or defense, or they might be on an expiring contract with the likelihood that this is going to be their last year in Green Bay anyway. Carrington Valentine- Valentine finds himself in both categories mentioned above. He is entering the final year of his rookie contract, and he didn’t quite live up to expectations when thrust into a starting role due to Nate Hobbs’ injury. Now, I find myself in the camp of someone who thinks Valentine receives some unnecessary criticism. This is a former 7th-round pick who has played much more than you could reasonably expect of someone drafted there, and he has played very well at times. Sometimes he looks like a high-end starting corner, like when he lined up against A.J. Brown for the majority of the Eagles matchup this year, and A.J. Brown walked out of that game with a total of 13 receiving yards. Other times, he looks like he’s never attempted a tackle before. Ultimately, the Packers and Brian Gutekunst have basically stated they are going to be seeking upgrades in the secondary. Seeing how they have one of the best safety duos in football, all signs point to corner. If Nate Hobbs doesn’t get released, he is getting paid like a starter. Taking Javon Bullard out of the slot and off the field, where he played very well last year, doesn’t make a ton of sense, so Hobbs will likely be the starting outside corner opposite of Keisean Nixon. It should be noted that Valentine’s 2026 salary jumps up to $3.699 million, as this is the final year of his deal. Is there a team out there willing to part with a mid-round pick for a young corner with 19 career regular-season starts, plus 3 more in the playoffs, under his belt? Karl Brooks- Brooks finds himself in a similar position as Valentine. He is entering the final year of his rookie contract, and his performance on the field has been widely inconsistent. After a rookie and sophomore season playing a backup interior pass-rushing role behind the likes of Kenny Clark and T.J. Slaton, he was asked to take on a bigger role and play more snaps, and he disappointed, as did the majority of the Packers’ defensive line. In 618 snaps, he finished with 28 tackles, a half sack, 1 pass defended, and 25 pressures. 2025 was the lowest-rated season of Brooks’ career, with just a 46.3 PFF grade. Defensive line is one of, if not the biggest, needs for the Packers this offseason. Last year was marred by underperformance and injury up and down the line. If they spend real dollars to improve the talent at the top of the depth chart, they will need some cheap backups. Brooks making over $3.6 million to play a rotational role after last year’s performance isn’t going to be the solution. He also probably doesn’t figure into their long-term plans, with the long list of players requiring extensions. If they are going to give one to a rotational defensive lineman, it’s probably Colby Wooden, so Green Bay might be better off flipping him for a pick now. Dontayvion Wicks- I, for the record, would not trade Wicks. I think the more weapons the better, especially with some injury risks at the postion but if tempted with an offer, it could make some sense for Green Bay. Regardless of the fact they are going to lose Romeo Doubs in free agency, they will still have Christian Watson, Jayden Reed, Matthew Golden, and Savion Williams who will need to see the field. Not to mention a returning Tucker Kraft, who established himself as a top target, and Josh Jacobs. With only one football to go around, Wicks finds himself expendable. He, like Valentine and Brooks, was also a member of the 2023 draft class and is on an expiring contract. Unlike those two, however, Wicks finds himself in the position of entering a contract year at the same time as fellow wide receivers Christian Watson and Jayden Reed. It’s unlikely for the Packers to extend all three of Wicks, Watson, and Reed and tie up significant money in a position like receiver, where more and more college players are coming in and contributing on Day 1. Reed is the better overall receiver and a better fit for Matt LaFleur’s offense, so out of the two, I would float Wicks out there and see what you can get in return. Filed Under: FeaturedGreen Bay PackersDan Saia -Dan Saia NFL Categories: Green Bay PackersTags: Packers offseasongreen bay packers draftCarrington ValentineKarl BrooksDontavyion Wicks Like 0 points
05.03.2026 21:06 👍 8 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
The Time for the Green Bay Packers to Sign Tucker Kraft to an Extension Is Now Green Bay Packers tight end Tucker Kraft will be entering the final year of his rookie contract in 2026. GM Brian Gutekunst should sign the former South Dakota State star to an extension at some point this offseason even with the risks surrounding his injury. Kraft had a breakout season in 2025 before his season-ending injury. In eight games, he caught 32 passes for 489 yards and six touchdowns. The six touchdowns tied him for the team lead for the season despite the fact that he missed 9 games. Before the injury, Kraft was on pace to become the first Packers tight end to top 1,000 yards receiving in a season. He had established himself as a key cog in the Green Bay attack. Kraft gives the Packers offense a very important weapon. He excels at running after the catch and is very difficult to bring down one-on-one. Quarterback Jordan Love had the ultimate security blanket and checkdown target. Love could throw the ball three yards downfield to Kraft and know that his big tight end could turn a short pass into a bigger gain. For the season, Kraft gained a career-high 10.8-yards after the catch per route run according to pro-football-reference.com. That means Love could throw the ball to Kraft a yard behind the line of scrimmage and still pick up a first down. The Packers felt Kraft’s absence in the second half of the season. The team scored an average of 25.8 points per game with Kraft in the lineup in the first eight games. That number fell to 19.4 in the final nine games that Kraft missed. Gutekunst has already expressed a desire to sign Kraft to a new contract. “Obviously, he’s a really important part of this football team, and we would certainly like to have him around, but that’ll be something we work through with his people, and we’ll kind of see what’s best for us, best for them,” Gutekunst said last month. “Certainly, the impact that he has on our football team, not only as a player but as a leader, is very important to us. We’ve already been in contact with him, just letting him know how we feel, and we’ll kind of see where it goes.” The big question now is when to do it. Kraft remains under contract for 2026. The Packers do not want to risk losing him when his contract expires in a year as he has proven he can be a Pro Bowl level performer and a difference maker on offense. But Kraft may miss the start of training camp due to the season ending ACL injury he suffered last season. The Packers may want to wait to see how well Kraft returns from this major injury before committing to him for the long haul. These injuries can be tricky. Kraft could have a quick recovery like Christian Watson did a year ago, or there could be complications like David Bakhtiari went through which required additional surgeries and eventually ended his NFL career. However, waiting could also cost the Packers money. The salary cap goes up every year and so does player salaries. Certainly, Kraft will want top tight end money and with each new signing at the position, the cost will only go up. For example, the Atlanta Falcons just placed the franchise tag on their tight end, Kyle Pitts. If he plays on that contract, he will earn $15 million in 2026 on a one-year, fully guaranteed contract. The Falcons GM indicated that they hoped to sign Pitts to a long-term deal, but that the $15 million number was “a reasonable number off which to work a deal.” We’ll see how Gutekunst and cap guru Russ Ball handle the negotiations with Kraft this offseason. Remember that top wide receiver Christian Watson also needs a new contract after the 2026 campaign. Clearly, the Packers front office has some work to do this offseason, but keeping Kraft and signing him to a new contract should be a no-brainer.   Filed Under: FeaturedGil Martin   PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ You can follow Gil Martin on Twitter @GilPackers __________________________ NFL Categories: Green Bay PackersTags: Green Bay PackersTucker KraftBrian Gutekunst Like 0 points
05.03.2026 12:28 👍 30 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0
Pack-A-Day Podcast - Episode 2779 - Are the Packers NFLPA Grades a Sign of Organizational Decay? On today's show, Andy Herman takes a look at the NFLPA grades from 2025 and discusses the key issues, and why it could be a legitimate sign of organizational decay. Don't miss it!     Filed Under: Pack A Day Podcast   PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Andy is a graduate of UW-Oshkosh and owns & operates the Pack-A-Day Podcast. Andy has taken multiple courses in NFL scouting and is an Editor for Packer Report. Andy grew up in Green Bay and is a lifelong season ticket holder - follow him on Twitter @AndyHermanNFL! __________________________ NFL Categories: Green Bay PackersTags: Pack-A-Day PodcastPackers podcastPacker PodcastGreen Bay Packers podcastgreen bay packer Like 0 points
05.03.2026 11:25 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
Packers Daily: Chris Brooks back in the fold Listen to the podcast here: Find all of my daily podcasts here. Filed Under: Aaron Nagler#PackersDailyPacker Fan Podcasts   PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Tags: Green Bay PackersPackers Daily Like 0 points
04.03.2026 23:16 👍 8 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
Packers re-sign RB Chris Brooks Per his agency, Packers running back Chris Brooks has agreed to a two-year, $4.85 million deal with the Packers. The former undrafted free agent originally entered the NFL with the Miami Dolphins in 2023. Brooks has spent the last two seasons in Green Bay serving as a reliable depth option, posting 82 carries for 395 yards (4.8 yards per carry) and five touchdowns, while adding 24 receptions for 160 yards through the air. Running back depth was already a priority for the Packers this offseason, and the decision not to tender Emanuel Wilson only amplified that need. With Josh Jacobs leading the backfield and MarShawn Lloyd still largely unproven after two injury-plagued seasons, Brooks could be in line for a bigger role.  Filed Under: Packers News   PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Tags: Chris Brooks Like 0 points
04.03.2026 17:16 👍 14 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 1
Preview
Why Have a Legal Tampering Period? Monday, March 9th, at 11 AM CST, begins the 2026 NFL legal tampering period. It ends on Wednesday, March 11th, at 3 PM CST when free agency officially begins. The statement that free agency officially begins on Wednesday always seems silly, as anyone who's followed NFL free agency since the "legal tampering period" was introduced around 13 years ago will tell you that Monday is basically when free agency starts. Most of the top free agents and more will have agreements set by the end of Monday. So, why even have the legal tampering period? Why not just start free agency? The NFL officially instituted the legal tampering period in 2013. Its purpose was to allow teams to negotiate with agents of unrestricted free agents and attempt to minimize the amount of "back door negotiations" occurring around the league. During the two-day window, franchises can negotiate contracts with agents and reach verbal agreements before signings become official. The teams cannot officially sign players until free agency officially begins, though, putting pen to paper. The Packers haven't always been very active in free agency, but two years ago, they agreed to terms with safety Xavier McKinney very early on in the tampering period. And McKinney wasn't even the first one announced that day. Not very long after, news broke of the Packers reaching an agreement with Josh Jacobs.  This always begs the question of whether or not teams are truly abiding by the rules. Many suggest that while teams don't negotiate directly with agents, they do subtly throw estimates around or they communicate through a third party, making that verbal agreement quick and easy.  So, with so many pending free agents reaching agreements quickly with new teams on the first day, what's the point of having it? Why not just start free agency? One of the main reasons behind keeping the legal tampering period has been to either give players an out or give other teams a chance to match or exceed the offer. If a pending unrestricted free agent reaches a verbal agreement to sign with a different team, their current team can still attempt to negotiate to keep them since they haven't officially signed yet. These examples have been few and far between, but in 2019, linebacker Anthony Barr had agreed to terms with the New York Jets but changed course and instead re-signed with the Minnesota Vikings, his previous team. Why give the previous team the chance to counter, though? Haven't they had their chance to sign the player? Yes, but as the saying goes, "deadlines spur action," and there's no bigger deadline than another team trying to take away a player you want to keep.  How to change the legal tampering period With the legal tampering period essentially being the unofficial start of free agency due to the high activity, and the chances of players going back on their verbal agreements being very low, the league might as well do away with it. If they're worried about other teams not having the chance to counter, why not just make every agreement within the first day or so of free agency have a short counter window where other teams can reach out, attempt to match or exceed the previous offer? That way, players still have the chance to back out if they receive another offer, and teams still have the chance to retain or sign players before pen hits paper.  Of course, even if something of that nature is implemented, situations probably will arise that make it seem as silly as the tampering period, but that way free agency's start will be the true start. No "technical start of free agency" two days later, after all of the top candidates have essentially been "signed." One way or another, teams are going to still communicate with players or their agents before they're allowed through loopholes. That's never going to end. So, just tweak the rules a bit and instead make the "tampering period" the official start of free agency.    Filed Under: FeaturedGreg Meinholz PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Greg Meinholz is a lifelong devoted Packer fan. A contributor to CheeseheadTV as well as PackersTalk. Follow him on Twitter @gmeinholz and Bluesky @gmeinholz.bsky.social for Packers commentary, random humor, beer endorsements, and occasional Star Wars and Marvel ramblings. __________________________ NFL Categories: Green Bay PackersTags: Green Bay PackersXavier McKinneyJosh Jacobslegal tampering period2026 free agency Like 0 points
04.03.2026 16:22 👍 7 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 1
Preview
Breaking Down The Top 64: Packers Prospects on the Big Board Filed Under: FeaturedPacker Fan Podcasts   PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Tags: Green Bay PackersNFL Draft Like 0 points
04.03.2026 14:07 👍 4 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
Confessions of a Polluted Mindset - The Specials Special teams continues to be the main news around the Green Bay Packers. After Rich Bisaccia supposedly (insert your choice: stepped down from/walked out on/quit on/was fired from/was encouraged to leave) the Packers on February 17th, it didn't take long for them to hire a replacement. Sam Achord, a one-time special teams coordinator for the Patriots and most recently, an assistant special teams coach with the Giants, was Matt LaFleur's choice to take over the task of improving the Packers' special teams operation. As I'm sure you have read by now, Achord was promoted to the top job in New England by Bill Belichick and had instant success, garnering the top spot in Rich Gosselin's annual special teams rankings in his first season there. They fell precipitously in the following seasons with various theories as to who is to blame. Of course, the buck stops at the coordinator level (don't we know that well, Packers fans), but there are dissenting opinions. The most interesting one comes from the Patriots' Matthew Slater, one of the best special team aces in the history of the NFL. Slater is on record stating that the special teams falloff was not on the coaching staff at all, but rather on the failure of players to execute. An interesting fact that I just learned was that the Patriots had the top punting and punt return unit in the league during Achord's time there. While we're pretty set with our punter and the punt coverage unit has been good, we all know the level of mediocrity we have witnessed from the punt return unit. Can we hope that Achord improves that unit for the Packers? I guess it depends if the Packers actually find a returner who actually has some punt return ability. More than anything, that would require an organizational shift in philosophy, so don't hold your breath. Without exonerating Rich Bisaccia, you can certainly draw a parallel from what Slater had to say to some of what happened to the Packers this year. If Romeo Doubs handles that onside kick, the Packers likely are division champs and their wild card weekend game is at Lambeau Field. If McManus makes his field goals in the playoff game (as Chicago's kicker did), the Packers win and advance in the playoffs. I could grouse about linemen not doing their jobs blocking for field goals earlier in the season that cost the Packers two wins and a comfortable clinching of a division championship, etc., etc. Well, you probably don't want to hear this, but Bisaccia was not on the field for those gaffes.  As I mentioned last week, my feeling is that Bisaccia felt hamstrung by some of the limitations imposed on him both by personnel decisions and in-game availability decisions. Brian Gutekunst gave one player on the roster to Bisaccia exclusively for special teams ability and has shown little interest in rostering a real kick returner. It took two blocked field goal disasters before Matt LaFleur allowed the use of more starting linemen on that unit. I believe Rich Bisaccia became a very frustrated man and the timing of his leaving tells me in the weeks worth of meetings since the season ended, he didn't see anything to indicate a change in the Packers' approach.  To make matters worse the majority of writers, media pundits, analysts and especially fans out there were pointing the finger of blame directly at him. Like it was ALL his fault. While he's surely not on social media or normally paying too much attention to what the outside world thinks about him, I'd wager that those in his inner circle (family, close friends, his agent, etc.) let him know the picture that was being painted - that he was a clueless bum and an abject failure of a coach. While you can't last in the NFL for as long as Rich has without being able to handle pressure, this is pressure of a different kind. Thanks to the internet, social media and the resulting environment of no repercussions for making false statements and accusations, it's very easy to ruin someone's reputation, even if completely unjustified (I'm going to stop myself there on that topic before I go on a five page rant on it). My first thought when Bisaccia said he was stepping down to pursue other opportunities, was that he probably will look to take a step back and work on a college staff where he can do more mentoring and teaching of younger players. As I write this Tuesday morning, there have been reports that Clemson is close to hiring him as their special teams coordinator. Bisaccia has some significant history in South Carolina in the late 80s and 90s. He coached for six years at the University of South Carolina and then five years at Clemson as their running backs coach and special teams coach. I can envision him wanting to return to that beautiful (and much warmer) area and while Clemson is no small-time university, perhaps he sees it as an opportunity to change the narrative around him and shed the pressure of being the person everyone is blaming for failures that should be attributed to a group of men.  There's a song from a British Ska group called The Specials (appropriate, right), who ruled the UK pop charts in the very late 70's and early 80s. It's always been one of my favorite songs and this whole situation made me think of it. It's called "Pressure Drop" and some of the lyrics go like this: It is you (oh, yeah) It is you, you (oh, yeah) It is you (oh, yeah) I say, a pressure drop, oh pressure Oh yeah, pressure drop, a drop on you I say, a pressure drop, oh pressure Oh yeah, pressure drop, a drop on you I say, and when it drops, oh, you gonna feel it Know what you were doing's wrong I say, when it drop, oh, you gonna feel it Know what you were doing's wrong It is you (oh, yeah) It is you, you (oh, yeah) It is you, you (oh, yeah)   Go Pack Go!    Filed Under: FeaturedJersey Al Bracco   PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ "Jersey Al" Bracco is the Editor-In-Chief, part owner and wearer of various hats for CheeseheadTV.com and PackersTalk.com. He's a lifetime Packers fan living in the land of the Giants (and Jets). Follow Al on twitter at @JerseyalGBP.  __________________________ NFL Categories: Green Bay PackersMinnesota VikingsTags: Green Bay PackersPolluted Mindset2026 Like 0 points
04.03.2026 12:23 👍 6 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0
Pack-A-Day Podcast - Episode 2778 - Packers Pre-Free Agency Chat w/ Justis Mosqueda! On today's show, Justis & Andy catch up on everything that's happened over the past week, including Green Bay hiring Cam Achord as their new Special Teams coordinator, a less than glowing NFLPA report card, Rich Bisaccia leaving for Clemson, new developments in the NFC North, the latest on Elgton Jenkins & Rashan Gary, and a TON more. Don't miss it!!!     Filed Under: Pack A Day Podcast   PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Andy is a graduate of UW-Oshkosh and owns & operates the Pack-A-Day Podcast. Andy has taken multiple courses in NFL scouting and is an Editor for Packer Report. Andy grew up in Green Bay and is a lifelong season ticket holder - follow him on Twitter @AndyHermanNFL! __________________________ NFL Categories: Green Bay PackersTags: Pack-A-Day PodcastPackers podcastPacker PodcastGreen Bay Packers podcastgreen bay packer Like 0 points
04.03.2026 11:20 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
Packers Daily: Good Luck, Cam Achord Filed Under: Aaron Nagler#PackersDailyPacker Fan Podcasts   PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Tags: Green Bay PackersPackers Daily Like 0 points
03.03.2026 22:48 👍 5 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
Packers Will Not Host Game Overseas in 2026 The Green Bay Packers 2026 schedule will not be released until early May, but today the last international host was announced, which does affect the Packers. With today’s news of the Atlanta Falcons hosting the Madrid, Spain game, it means the Packers will not be a host for an international game. Because in 2026 the NFC will have the 9th home game, seven of the eight hosts that have been selected are NFC teams. The lone exception is the Jacksonville Jaguars, who have been hosting games annually in London since 2013. How does this affect the Green Bay Packers? Just like in 2024, the Packers will play nine games at Lambeau Field. In 2022, the first year the NFC had nine home games, the Packers hosted a game against the New York Giants in London at Tottenham Hotspur Stadium. In 2024, the Packers could not take advantage of playing nine home games, as they lost all three home games to divisional opponents. Last season the Packers finished 5-3 at home with losses to the Carolina Panthers, Philadelphia Eagles and Baltimore Ravens. With the NFC having extra home games, it is likely the top teams in the conference will have strong records, compared to years when the AFC has the ninth home game. In 2022 the NFC’s #1 seed was the 14-3 Eagles and in 2024 the #1 seed was the 15-2 Lions. Can the Packers still play overseas? Of the teams selected to play international games, several are on the Packers’ 2026 schedule. Three of the teams will be coming to Lambeau Field next season: Dallas Cowboys, Atlanta Falcons and Detroit Lions. The Packers will be playing road games against the Los Angeles Rams, Detroit Lions and New Orleans Saints. The Rams’ international game already has an opponent, the San Francisco 49ers, so the Packers will not be traveling to Melbourne, Australia. There is a chance the Packers could play in Europe, as they have road games against Detroit and New Orleans. It is unlikely a Lions-Packers game would be played in Germany, however, the NFL has already scheduled an NFC division rivalry game in another country, so it is possible that a marquee matchup, like Lions-Packers could be played overseas. The Packers, like the Lions, are a popular team in Germany, so it is possible. Another option overseas is playing in Paris, France against the New Orleans Saints. If the Packers and Saints were to play in Paris, it would be the first NFL regular season game to be played in France. It would also mean the Packers would miss out on traveling to New Orleans and playing in the Superdome for the second straight time the Saints were a road opponent. In 2021, the Week 1 Packers at Saints game was played in Jacksonville because of Hurricane Ida, as the Saints were displaced for the week leading up to the game. Filed Under: FeaturedMitchell McLaughlin PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Mitch McLaughlin is a Packers fan and shareholder residing in Sacramento, California. He will be writing Packers stories each week on Cheesehead TV. He can be found on Twitter: @McLaughlinMitch __________________________   NFL Categories: Green Bay Packers Like 0 points
03.03.2026 20:51 👍 8 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 1
Preview
Around the NFC North: 2026 Salary Cap Review Each of the four NFC North teams is over the salary cap as it currently stands, and each has plenty of levers to pull to delete talent or kick the can down the road and try to compete in the coming season. Let's talk about it.  Note that I am writing this on Sunday afternoon; it was just reported that the Vikings will cut Aaron Jones and Javon Hargrave. Any other news hasn't happened yet.  Vikings ($45mm) in cap space The Vikings are in the worst position in the division and one of the worst in the league. They are $45mm above the cap, and they don't even have a veteran QB using millions of cap dollars. They just have a history of bad decisions.  Like I said in the intro, veterans Aaron Jones and Javon Hargrave have already been informed that they will be released. That frees up about $18.6mm. So, what's next? Cutting Jonathan Allen and Brian O'Neil would basically get them to break even on the cap, and then restructuring Justin Jefferson gets them about $18mm in cap space. Plenty to sign their draft picks and get a QB, as long as they kick the can on the QB contract, too. It's worth noting that the restructure would put Jefferson's cap hit at at least $56mm in 2028, his age 29 season. Maybe he'll be worth a third contract at or before that point, but it's a big bet to make for a receiver who has already regressed. Meanwhile, those cuts would leave them without a consistent pass rusher on the interior and any offensive lineman who graded above average last season. Not great! Let's repeat that: to get to where the team can sign its draft picks and maybe do one other signing, they would be cutting Aaron Jones, Brian O'Neil, Jonathan Allen, and Javon Hargrave and then max restructuring Justin Jefferson.  Obviously, there are other moves. They could save $9mm in a Christian Darrisaw restructure and plenty of money restructuring other players: $13mm on Jonathan Greenard, $9.5mm on TJ Hockenson, $11mm on Byron Murphy, $9mm on Will Fries. They could also save $8.8mm cutting Hockenson.  They're going to have to fiddle with some contracts or cut more guys, that's all there is to it. Any player they cut makes the team worse, and any contract they fiddle with makes the cap worse in the coming years. All this and they don't even have a QB.  Lions ($12mm) in cap space  The Lions sort of do have a quarterback, and that's the problem. Jared Goff's cap hit of $69.6mm is insane. Max restructure him, and you get the hit down to $29mm. That puts you at $28mm in space - plenty of room to sign the draft class and one or two free agents. You have to make sacrifices as a playoff team. That's fine, right?  It's fine if you want a 34-year-old Goff playing on an unavoidable $80mm cap hit in 2028. In other words, hell no. So, what do you do? Taylor Deceker has started the retirement waffling. If he leaves, that basically gets you to break even. It also leaves you without a starting left tackle when your offensive line's regression last season led to several losses, but that's for another day. If they use shenanigans to have that hit post-June 1, it would save $17.9mm, but remember: that puts part of the cap hit on 2027, and it means they have to use other moves to get under the cap before the league year starts because the Decker savings wouldn't come until June 1.  There's not much left to save with cuts. David Montgomery at $3.5mm, Graham Glasgow at $5.6mm, Jack Fox (no clue who that is) at $3.1mm. Maybe they'll cut one or two of those guys, but it doesn't really move the needle.  With restructures, we know they have the $40mm lever with Goff, they can also free up $21mm with the Sun God, $17mm with Alim McNeil, $15mm with Penei Sewell, $5.2mm with Derrick Barnes, or $10.5mm with DJ Reed. How many of those moves do you really want to make? By restructuring, you're all but guaranteeing that you will give that player a third contract. I would do Sewell for sure. Barnes and Reed are already on bad deals. Alim McNeil was the 90th-ranked DT last season. The Sun God would be a 29-year-old slow receiver. Not a lot of good options! I would guess that they will cut a few guys and do partial restructures on a few. But they have definite holes on the team right now, have to sign their draft class and have extensions for players like Aidan Hutchinson and Brian Branch and Jahmyr Gibbs and Sam LaPorta and Jack Campbell on the horizon. The good news is that Terrion Arnold is a bust, so they don't have to worry about that.  Three of those guys are definitely in the team's top five players. Sam LaPorta was last off-season before he got hurt. This is what happens when the GM falls in love with his draft picks and gives everyone with one good season (Kerby Joseph, Alim McNeil, Jameson Williams, Derrick Barnes) an inflated contract and overspends on free agents (DJ Reed, Graham Glasgow). You have to make really tough decisions when the actually good players come up for a new deal.  Bears ($6.5mm) in cap space You may be thinking, "Wow, the Bears really are a model franchise; they have the best cap non-space in the division because they are only $6.5mm over the cap." You're missing the fact that they AREN'T PAYING A DAMN QB. How are these teams screwing up their cap space this badly without paying a QB??? I can tell you how the Bears did it. They're paying DJ Moore $27mm this year. Montez Sweat, Jaylon Johnson, Joe Thuney, Dayo Odeyingobo and Jonah Jackson are all over $19.5mm in cap hit. Grady Jarret is at $18.9mm and Tremaine Edmunds is at $17.4mm.  That's a lot of money for a lot of OK players.  We know they're trying to trade DJ Moore and Tremaine Edmunds. Do those two trades and get rid of Cole Kmet ,and all of a sudden, they have $25mm in space as free agency starts. Cap magic!  Try not to think about how they're getting rid of two former first-round picks and a second-round pick to do it, or how they would have a total of $17.6mm in dead cap to do it. The best-case scenario for the Bears' offseason is that they would pay $17.6mm to not have two former first-round picks. Remember, this team was one of the luckiest in the league last season. Almost all analytics point to a regression this year. Any move to get rid of good players just to function will make the team worse.    Filed Under: Packers NewsFeaturedGreen Bay PackersMike PriceAround the NFC North   PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Mike Price is a lifelong Packers fan who recently moved from Utah to Stoughton (a Madison suberb). You can follow him on twitter at @themikeprice. __________________________ NFL Categories: Chicago BearsDetroit LionsGreen Bay PackersMinnesota VikingsNFC NorthTags: packersVikingsLionsBears Like 0 points
03.03.2026 16:17 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
Cory's Corner: The Key To Next Season Is Simple: Offensive Line Continuity When people talk about the ceiling of the Green Bay Packers, the conversation usually starts with skill players and ends with the quarterback. It’s about playmakers, defensive growth, and whether the roster is “ahead of schedule.” But the real swing factor in Green Bay’s season might be far less glamorous. It’s the offensive line — and more specifically, its continuity. We’ve seen enough of Jordan Love to understand a simple truth: he is a dramatically different passer when he operates from a clean pocket versus when he’s forced off his spot. When kept clean, Love looks like a top-tier distributor. His mechanics stay compact. His base stays firm. His timing within structure — especially on deep crossers and outbreaking routes — is decisive. With protection, his passer rating jumps significantly, his yards per attempt climb, and his turnover-worthy plays drop. The ball comes out on schedule, and the offense hums. In a clean pocket, Love completed 79.6 percent of his passes this year with 23 touchdowns and only two picks. It was the same story last year with a completion rate of 70.1 to go along with 18 touchdowns and six picks. Ever since Love became a regular starter in 2023, he has completed 72.5 of his passes from a clean pocket with 64 touchdowns and 15 picks.  But when hurried? The efficiency dips. The footwork gets wider. His internal clock speeds up. Like most quarterbacks not named Mahomes, Love’s production under pressure declines sharply. Completion percentage falls. Decision-making becomes riskier. Explosive plays give way to scramble drills and throwaways. In 2025, Love only completed 41.6 percent of his passes when under pressure. In three years, he has completed 45.9 of his passes, thrown 16 touchdowns and tossed 13 interceptions from a muddy pocket.  That’s not an indictment. It’s reality in the modern National Football League. Pressure changes everything. “Any quarterback will tell you it’s easier when the pocket’s clean,” said Love. “But in this league, you’ve got to make throws with people around you. That’s the difference.” Which is why continuity up front is the hidden hinge of Green Bay’s season. The Packers have talent along the offensive line. They’ve invested draft capital. They’ve developed versatility. But talent alone doesn’t guarantee stability. Communication — especially against today’s disguise-heavy defensive fronts — requires reps. Combo blocks require trust. Pass-off responsibilities against stunts and simulated pressures require chemistry that only comes from playing together. When the line shuffles weekly due to injuries or experimentation, protection calls get murkier. Depth gets tested. The pocket gets muddier. And muddy pockets neutralize quarterback growth. For a young passer still refining his anticipatory throws and post-snap processing, consistency up front isn’t a luxury — it’s oxygen. The difference between second-and-6 and second-and-12 isn’t just field position. It’s playbook freedom. It’s staying out of obvious passing downs where edge rushers pin their ears back. The Packers don’t need a top-five offensive line to contend. They need a healthy, cohesive one. Because here’s the bigger picture: Love doesn’t need chaos to create. He thrives in rhythm. He thrives when his first read is available and his feet can stay married to the play design. A stable offensive line doesn’t just protect him — it accelerates him. And if Green Bay wants to find out what its true offensive ceiling is this season, the formula isn’t complicated. Keep the pocket clean. Keep the combinations consistent. Keep the communication intact. Continuity up front won’t generate headlines. It won’t trend on social media. But it might quietly determine whether this team is competitive in December — or dangerous in January.   Filed Under: Packers NewsNFL DraftFeaturedGreen Bay PackersCory JennerjohnCory's Corner   PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Cory Jennerjohn is a graduate from UW-Oshkosh and has been in sports media for over 15 years. He was a co-host on "Clubhouse Live" and has also done various radio and TV work as well. He has written for newspapers, magazines and websites. He currently is a columnist for CHTV and also does various podcasts. He recently earned his Masters degree from the University of Iowa. He can be found on Twitter: @Coryjennerjohn __________________________ NFL Categories: Green Bay PackersTags: Green Bay PackersJordan LovePackers offensive line cohesion Like 0 points
03.03.2026 12:19 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Pack-A-Day Podcast - Episode 2777 - NFL Combine Recap - Packers Edition On today's show, Jacob Morley breaks down his key takeaways from the NFL Combine and which players are now firmly on the Packers radar!!! Don't miss it!!!     Filed Under: Pack A Day Podcast   PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Andy is a graduate of UW-Oshkosh and owns & operates the Pack-A-Day Podcast. Andy has taken multiple courses in NFL scouting and is an Editor for Packer Report. Andy grew up in Green Bay and is a lifelong season ticket holder - follow him on Twitter @AndyHermanNFL! __________________________ NFL Categories: Green Bay PackersTags: Pack-A-Day PodcastPackers podcastPacker PodcastGreen Bay Packers podcastgreen bay packer Like 0 points
03.03.2026 11:15 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
Packers Daily: Almost Decision Time Listen to the podcast here: Find all of my daily podcasts here. Filed Under: Aaron Nagler#PackersDailyPacker Fan Podcasts   PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Tags: Green Bay PackersPackers Daily Like 0 points
02.03.2026 23:25 👍 8 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
Inside the Packers’ Recent Big-Man Blueprint On The Offensive Line Filed Under: FeaturedPacker Fan Podcasts   PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Tags: Green Bay PackersPackers offensive line Like 0 points
02.03.2026 22:40 👍 9 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 1
Preview
Get to Know Green Bay's New Special Teams Coordinator: Cam Achord The Green Bay Packers have hired Cameron Achord as their new special teams coordinator. The Packers reportedly interviewed at least seven different candidates over the last week to fill the position, but Matt LaFleur ultimately went with the 39-year-old. Achord was most recently an assistant special teams coach for the New York Giants, but before that, he was the special teams coordinator for the New England Patriots. The hire of Achord should be the final major hire in what was a busy coaching carousel. The Packers were left searching for a new special teams coordinator after Rich Bisaccia unexpectedly stepped down from the position on February 17. It was reported today that Bisaccia will become the special teams coordinator at Clemson University. Bisaccia’s departure put the Packers in a difficult position because most of the top candidates had already been hired. "While we are disappointed to lose a person and coach as valuable as Rich, we respect his decision to step down from the Packers," Matt LaFleur said. "Rich was a tremendous resource to me and our entire coaching staff, who had a profound impact on our players and our culture throughout the building. We can't thank him enough for his contributions to our team over the last four years. We wish Rich, his wife, Jeanne, and the rest of their family all the best moving forward." Looking ahead, the Packers are hoping Achord can provide some stability to their special teams units. The Packers hired Bisaccia in 2022 to help stabilize their special teams units after Shawn Mennega and Maurice Drayton both struggled to produce competent units. Keisean Nixon earned two All-Pro nods for kick returning under Bisaccia, and Daniel Whelan had one of the best punting seasons in team history. Aside from those bright spots, Bisaccia’s overall units were near the bottom of the league. Per the Packers on SI rankings, his groups finished 20th, 22nd, 27th, and 17th. Special teams have plagued the Packers for the last decade or more, so the hope is that Achord can just help make their special teams units average. Packers name Cam Achord special teams coordinator — Green Bay Packers (@packers) February 27, 2026 Achord's Unexpected Path to the NFL Cameron Achord comes to the Packers with nearly ten years of NFL coaching experience, but it wasn’t a conventional path to the NFL. Achord was born and raised in Brookhaven, Mississippi. He went on to play free safety at Belhaven University, a NAIA school in Mississippi. He was a four-year starter and a two-time team captain. He earned All-Mid-South Conference honors once and NAIA Academic All-American honors twice. Achord's coaching career got started in 2010 as a special teams graduate assistant at the University of Southern Mississippi. He spent two years in that role and then moved to the offensive side of the ball for one season. In 2013, Achord joined the Southwest Mississippi Community College football staff. He served in many roles during his five-year tenure there, including special teams coordinator, quarterbacks coach, running backs coach, tight ends coach, and offensive coordinator. He was even named the interim head coach for a short time. The New England Patriots came calling in 2018, giving Achord his first chance to jump to the NFL. Bill Belichick and Joe Judge hired Achord as an assistant special teams coach. In his first season with the team, Achord won a Super Bowl and helped kick returner Cordarrelle Patterson earn a Pro Bowl selection. The following season, Achord helped Matthew Slater earn 1st team All-Pro and Pro Bowl honors. Achord was promoted to special teams coordinator in 2020 after Joe Judge left to become the head coach of the New York Giants. It was Achord’s first opportunity to be an NFL coordinator. Achord spent four years as the special teams coordinator, all under Bill Belichick. He helped produce the NFL's top special teams unit in his first season, but the results were inconsistent each year after. After the Patriots and Belichick agreed to part ways following the 2023 season, Achord was not retained by new head coach Jerod Mayo. Instead, Achord was hired as an assistant special teams coach for the New York Giants. He remained in the role for two years, working under head coach Brian Daboll and special teams coordinator Michael Ghobrial. New York’s ownership decided to clean house following the 2025 season, and Achord was not retained. Patriots special teams coordinator Cam Achord says he usually drinks six or seven coffees followed by three Pepsis per day. — Doug Kyed (@DougKyed) December 15, 2020 A Mixed Bag of Results One thing Matt LaFleur always seems to value when putting together his staff is high-level experience. Achord has exactly that. He has multiple years of experience coordinating his own special teams units and has produced at the highest level. Additionally, Achord has helped multiple players earn All-Pro and Pro Bowl honors. That said, he's also had some really inconsistent units. His track record is a mixed bag of results that makes it hard to know what to expect. In Achord’s first season as a special teams coordinator, New England’s special teams finished first in Rick Gosselin’s annual special teams rankings. Achord had three players named All-Pros: punt returner Gunner Olszewski, punter Jake Bailey, and special teamer Matthew Slater. Achord inherited a strong, experienced group from Joe Judge, and Achord helped them perform at a high level. The Packers, on the other hand, haven’t had a top-ranked special teams in decades. Unfortunately, that seems to be Achord’s peak. The 2021 season wasn’t nearly as strong. Using Gosselin’s rankings, the Patriots regressed from the top-ranked special teams all the way to the 18th-ranked special teams. A big part of the dip was inconsistency. Nick Folk made 92% of his field goal attempts, and Matthew Slater was named a 2nd-team All-Pro and a Pro Bowler, but the punt units were terrible. Jake Bailey’s net average dropped from 45.6 yards to 39.6 yards, and the team gave up three blocked punts. 2022 was more of the same. The Patriots ranked 16th in Gosselin’s rankings, but were dead last in DVOA. The Patriots struggled significantly on special teams, and they got worse as the season went on. Bailey’s punting continued to regress. The Patriots ended up putting him on injured reserve and brought in a different punter mid-season. New England also allowed three kick returns for touchdowns. The only bright spot was rookie punt returner Marcus Jones, who led the league in punt return yards and was named a 1st-team All-Pro. Achord’s final season in New England was disappointing, to say the least. The team finished 13th in Gosselin’s rankings, but 28th in DVOA. They committed 17 penalties, which was the second-most in the NFL behind only - guess who? - the Packers. Rookie kicker Chad Ryland only made 64% of his kicks that season, including multiple key game-winning kicks. After Achord's peak in 2020, his units didn’t improve at all. In fact, they got worse year after year. It’s hard to know what to make of these finishes. When Achord had really good and experienced players, his special teams units were strong. When he was forced to coordinate a special teams group that was riddled with injuries and full of younger players, his units were inconsistent. Green Bay typically likes to use younger, inexperienced players on their special teams units. The hope is that Achord can help provide some stability. Even at Achord’s worst, his units in New England were still fairly average, something that many Green Bay fans would welcome at this point. Bill Belichick on retaining special teams coordinator Cam Achord after an up-and-down 2022 season: "Last year was last year; there were a lot of things that weren't good enough ... Good coach. Led the league in special teams in '20. I don't think that's the problem." — Mike Reiss (@MikeReiss) March 27, 2023 What Others Had To Say It’s hard to know what the Packers are getting in Achord, but it’s almost certain to be much different from Bisaccia. Achord is described as a young, high-energy coach. The two things they have in common are that they are both said to be strong teachers and hard workers. "Those guys work really hard,” Belichick said about Achord and his staff. “Cam learned from Joe (Judge) and has worked hard to learn, while working on a lot of things on his own. Nobody works harder than Cam. Cam is very well-prepared and is an excellent teacher. He's done a good job for us.” Everyone within the Packers organization spoke highly of Rich Bisaccia. He was a strong culture guy who had earned the love and respect of others. It’s hard to envision Achord replicating that, but he did it before in New England. “I’m really confident in Cam,” said five-time All-Pro Matthew Slater. “He is a bright young coach who really relates well to the players, but has the players’ respect.” Slater was selected to the Pro Bowl ten times as a special teams player, so if anyone knows about special teams, it’s him. His endorsement of Achord should carry some weight. "I think he did a great job this year. He had some added responsibility. I think he did a great job of handling it,” Slater detailed. “Conceptually, he understands how the team wants to play. He understands the skill sets the players have and putting them in position to have success. He did a good job of learning from Joe and Bill.” The Packers have been content with below-average special teams units over the last decade, but it needs to be better. They have lost too many important games because of special teams blunders. The Packers don’t need to be top-five in special teams. They don’t even need to be top ten. If they can just become a league-average special teams under Achord, that’s a win. Can Achord provide that? Only time will tell. Filed Under: Packers NewsFeaturedGreen Bay PackersCarter Semb PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Carter Semb is a lifelong Packer fan, shareholder, and season ticket holder. He is a contributor for Cheesehead TV and Packers Talk. For commentary surrounding Wisconsin sports, he can be found on X at @cmsemb. __________________________ NFL Categories: Green Bay PackersTags: Cam AchordMatt LaFleurRich Bisaccia Like 0 points
02.03.2026 20:56 👍 12 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0
Preview
Building a Packers Draft From Combine Participants The 2026 NFL Scouting Combine is officially in the books, with data collected on hundreds of prospects ahead of next month’s draft. With numbers added to their profiles, a picture of the types of players fit the traditional Packers’ mold is beginning to come together. In that spirit, here is an early look at what their draft could look like, based on the players they are likely to covet who are within striking distance of each of their picks according to the consensus big board. 52 - Jake Slaughter, Center, Florida We don’t know what will happen in free agency, but as things stand today, the Packers are going to need a new center for 2026. Slaughter makes all the sense in the world after turning in a strong workout, fitting the size profile Green Bay has historically taken at almost 6’4 ½”, 303 lbs, with 32 ⅜” arms, and having started for three years at Florida. The reports on his football intelligence are also glowing, and if the Packers need a rookie to start on day one at center, Slaughter may be the best fit in the draft. Unrelated: he has one of the best names in the draft, especially for an offensive lineman. 84 - Gracen Halton, Defensive Tackle, Oklahoma Halton was plenty productive for the Sooners, getting a QB pressure or a run stop every 8.61 snaps in his best season. Production does matter, regardless of the reputation Green Bay has built for traits ruling all. He also has the traits though, running a 4.83 40 with a 1.70 10-yard split at the Combine. Halton is on the smaller side at just over 6’2 ½”, 293 lbs, but would bring an explosive presence which the Packers lack when Devonte Wyatt is not on the field, as he wasn’t down the stretch in 2025. 120 - Daylen Everette, Cornerback, Georgia Cornerbacks from Georgia may cause Packers fans to twitch after the Eric Stokes experience, but Everette would not be a 1st round pick and therefore less of a risk. He ticks every box athletically, including running a 4.38 40 at almost 6’1 ⅓”, 196 lbs. Everette has had ups and downs during his career, but came up clutch in big moments, including a strong game against Matthew Golden’s Texas in the 2024 SEC Championship game, when he had two interceptions. He will also be able to contribute in run support, which Brian Gutekunst has made clear on several occasions is an important factor in their evaluation of corners. 158 - DeMonte Capehart, Defensive Tackle, Clemson Capehart is an interesting player, having spent six seasons at Clemson but never playing more than 347 snaps in a season, and racking up only 892 throughout his entire college career. What he does have though is legitimate power which he uses to cause problems for offensive linemen when he is on the field. Capehart showed out in Indy with a 4.85 40 and a 1.72 10-yard split at almost 6’5”, 314 lbs. He could be a worthwhile rotational piece in Jonathan Gannon’s defense. 200 - Charles Demmings, Cornerback, Stephen F. Austin Demmings was a winner of the Combine, putting on a show in the athletic testing. At over 6’1”, 193 lbs, he ran a 4.41 in the 40, jumped 42” in the vert and 11’0” in the broad. Coming from a small school, Demmings could be a bit of a project, and has not been asked to play much of a role in run defense – he had 64 tackles in four years as a starter, for context, Everette had 51 in just the 2024 season – but there are tools to work with here. 236 - Diego Pounds, Offensive Tackle, Ole Miss For a bigger offensive lineman, Pounds had an impressive day during the on-field drills in Indy. At 6’6”, 325 lbs, he managed a 5.15 40 with a 1.77 10, a 30” vert jump and a 9’4” broad. The 40, 10 and broad scores were all better than fan favorite Gennings Dunker, who weighs 10 lbs less. The Packers must keep adding depth and competition to the offensive line, especially given the lacklustre performance of the group in 2025. Pounds was a three-year starter at left tackle in college and could be the next late-round success story for Green Bay. 254 - Jack Kelly, Linebacker, BYU There are plenty of linebackers who could be attractive to the Packers in this draft, but they may also have bigger fish to fry and wait until the late rounds to add a body to the room. If that is the case, Kelly could make sense as he ticks all of their athletic boxes. He ran a 4.57 40 at 6’2”, 240 lbs and could serve as a backup linebacker while also bringing value on special teams. 257 - Caleb Douglas, Wide Receiver, Texas Tech Douglas had very solid production at Texas Tech and fits Green Bay’s size prototype for a wide receiver at 6’3 ½”, 206 lbs with 33 ⅛” arms. He then cemented his ‘Packersy’ tag with a 4.39 in the 40 and a 10’6” broad jump. He is a name to watch out for on day three. Filed Under: NFL DraftFeaturedGreen Bay PackersMark Oldacres   PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Mark Oldacres is a sports writer from Birmingham, England and a Green Bay Packers fan. You can follow him on twitter at @MarkOldacres __________________________ NFL Categories: Green Bay PackersTags: Packers newsscouting combine resultsPackers draft needsJake Slaughtergracen Halton Like 0 points
02.03.2026 16:17 👍 4 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
CHTV 2026 NFL Draft Scouting Report: TE Max Klare Filed Under: NFL Draft   PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Newt Westen is the Founder of 0-Tech Draft, contributor for The Draft Professor and Lead NFL Draft Analyst for CheeseheadTV.com. He's a lifetime Packers fan and you can follow Newt at @NFLDraft_Westen on X. __________________________ Tags: Green Bay PackersNFL DraftMax Klare Like 0 points
02.03.2026 15:05 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0