What if instead of these troops doing the work themselves, we use them to assist the local forces. By, with and through them. So as to not bear the burden ourselves?
What if instead of these troops doing the work themselves, we use them to assist the local forces. By, with and through them. So as to not bear the burden ourselves?
The year is 2056, your BC - a 78A (Vibe Coder) just called you into his office because one of your guys got a DUI on the way to PT
You signed up for TECH, not to be a babysitter.
JAG vs βTECHβ is the issue I have. One is a known quantity and skillset for a specific need
We have the GS system, we have Warrant Officers, hell we could make something newβ¦
My counter-offer:
Let them join as 2LTs instead. Do the work. Learn the lessons. Take the hits. Figure it out first.
They are not special and valorizing "tech" is some Brotherhood of Steel cult behavior.
Anyone involved in this should be ashamed of themselves.
Iβve spent a lot of time in two of these places and let me tell youβ¦not exactly ideal.
So basically, they want to collapse the state into anarchy like Afghanistan, Syria, or Somalia. Great strategy guys.
If you want to know why we stood up an office specifically to deal with CIVCAS (disbanded). Why we study the laws of war. Why we restrict ROE. Why we keep JAGs close in the targeting process. Why some of us who had to make hard decisions can still sleep at night. It was all there to prevent THIS.
Exactly! This specific situation- what happens when they punch back? - was THE thing everyone was supposed to be thinking about. I donβt know whoβs fault it is or what hat the outcome should be, but 100% to your point, why is a log cell trying to man a TOC rn? Why was that considered necessary?
The last two years of OIR is so incredibly different than the GWOT era many seem to be comparing this to. Nearly every dumb defense tech solution or kill chain theory revolved around this specific situation. Itβs just hard to emphasize how different this is from βthis is why you jump TOCsβ
The only issue I have with the βwhat is a TOC?β discourse is that this very specific problem was so heavily highlighted for this very very very specific reason. I donβt think it is a binary issue of could it or could it not have been avoided but it just seemed so careless.
The reason we typically don't give military operations silly or hollywood names is because then when a husband loses a wife and children lose their mother, the casualty notification officer doesn't have to say "your loved one died supporting operation epic fury"
10/10 run.
Maybe I'm kirking out but the unreality of this war is wild. People posting that thousands of Kurds are fighting the regime for the CIA, while the Kurds say it isn't happening. Every video of a missile attack I just have to assume is AI whether it is real or not.
Clearly they didnβt think they would go as far as they did.
The sheer hypocrisy re: Benghazi/abbey gate also doesnβt help
Itβs also true that this specific threat to these specific places were very much top of mind for this AO. And to say it wasnβt the number 1 issue coming from the force is an outright lie
Not saying a secdef/gcc cdr is on the hook for forcepro, but this specific problem set was so top of mind
There was never enough force protection. During my time there, we took a direct hit from a shaheed. These issues were not unknown
Everyone knew the drill, if the US/Israel hit Iran then they or their proxies would hit us. Clearly there was a miscalculation/failure on how far they would go this time
This is one of the most underrated GO/FO subtweets
Get the heck outta here! You have catholics there too? You know itβs like huge here in Americaβ¦
βSure buddyβ¦itβs the same thing π
I love this
Too many of the guys relitigate the Iraq war in their minds and think what is happening today is like in first blood part 2 where Rambo goes back to nam to get some payback for our boys.
Very unpopular opinion, but if this war somehow gives you closure as a GWOT vet then you need to really think about therapy or some additional forms of help
I shed no tears for the regime or their allies. But for me to say those three service members died to bring me closure seems way off
A lot of people talking about Venezuela and Iran as if itβs over and done with. Failing to mention that in Venezuela the dictators VP is now in charge (basically endorsed by the US now) and Iran doesnβt seem to have a flourishing democracy just yetβ¦
Thatβs actually an incredibly accurate depiction of his theory
Dems will try to take the pragmatic POV and say: βsee! The republicans pretend to love capitalism but actually hate it! You canβt run a business in this environment! Etc etcβ
Industry will see this and say: βall Dario had to do was shut up and make moneyβ or βwe just need to be transactionalβ
All that being said, I remember first walking into the connex where our CRAM operators sat - I looked around and thought to myself βIβm really glad someone else is doing this jobβ - itβs not a comfortable deployment in my mind. Kudos to you and your team.
Yes but other than first hand experience and years and years and years of training on this systemβ¦why should I listen to you vs Palmer?
They hate you so much they want you to attend their institutions, but donβt worry, we wonβt let you. I mean we wonβt let themβ¦.i meanβ¦they are woke and we donβt like themβ¦even though you tried to go thereβ¦but you canβt nowβ¦because they hate youβ¦but we wonβt let the hate you nowβ¦HOOAH
Yeah the problem is people like Palmer try to use very generic definitions/scenarios to talk about very specific things and then hope nobody knows the difference
Itβs the confidence that impresses me. He just says things.
Guarantee that if he was ever corrected and had those systems explained to him heβd just say something like βyou know what I meanβ and then move on