Editing is a different skillset than writing, but not everyone knows this. Sometimes companies hire editors based on how well they write and not how well they edit.
It's much harder to edit a good copy than a bad one.
Editing is a different skillset than writing, but not everyone knows this. Sometimes companies hire editors based on how well they write and not how well they edit.
It's much harder to edit a good copy than a bad one.
Post a banger that's not in English
It's a Puss in Boots!
Pigtails or a single side braid? Or a rope twist on the side if your hair can handle it.
Surprisingly many older managers going for it these days. As if they weren't the engineers suffering from this nonsense back when it was popular last time.
In case she wants practical philosophy (as in doing philosophy yourself rather than just reading what old men wrote), Tao Te Ching is what got me started. And you may laugh, but I consider the Dune series a gateway drug for thinking like a philosopher, very unserious but so effective.
So, Generative AI is a stochastic parrot regurgitating the average of all the worldβs most mediocre codeβ¦ Yet, somehow, the βupper elite 1% of talentβ is getting massive productivity gains from it? To the point where Elite Performing tech corporations mandate it?
That doesnβt add up
I wrote a longer bit on this topic: dorotaparad.ch/aiaiaiaiai/
I keep hearing this claim again and again - microservice architecture comes with extra complexity. Is that really so?
dorotaparad.ch/microservice...
When we only reward teams for delivering features or solving problems, we encourage two things:
1) releasing features that donβt matter 2) creation of problems to be solved.
If you want reliable software, reward teams when nothing happens.
dorotaparad.ch/recognition-...
@british-airways.bsky.social what's up with your booking system? I'm trying to book a flight and both your website and the app throw errors for the second day now, can't complete the process.
Are you not selling tickets anymore? Don't you want my money? π«
Could it be because there's "AI" in "samurai"?
The most surprising fact about this process is that it was fun. Well, minus the part involving React. I hope to some day recover those bits of my soul Iβve lost.
(6/6)
Then I found Zola and thatβs what I ended up using. It has some quirks and the templating language is too verbose for my taste, but overall felt really intuitive. Minimal, logical, straight forward - what else can a girl ask for?
Itβs also super fast, which is a nice bonus (yay Rust!)
(5/6)
Iβm now convinced that React is a tool devised by Satan to steal our souls and lead us all astray, and Docusaurus is simply an extension of that plan. (4/6)
Iβve started with Docusaurus, simply because thatβs what my team at Authress uses. I thought that was going to make things easy, since Iβd have a baseline to copy and tinker with. Ugh. Big mistake. (3/6)
What took me longest was finding an appropriate static site generator framework. And by βappropriateβ I mean one thatβs clean, logical, not bloated or too opinionated, and at the same time compatible with how I think about websites. Surprise, surprise, thatβs a challenging set of requirementsβ¦ (2/6)
Iβve finally created a home for some of my scribbles: dorotaparad.ch
I will fill it out with my past and new articles in the coming weeks and beyond. (1/6)
I have a very simple heuristic: If you and the CEO aren't on first-name speaking terms by the end of your first month, either the company's too big for you to matter, or the CEO thinks it is. Neither's a good omen.
It is so much easier to destroy than to build.
Even if you have certifications, most companies still ask you to fill in their silly paperwork, because that's "their process".
You can always direct them to a filled out CAIQ questionnaire, especially if it's a low value prospect.
I've said this before: AI is good for raising the floor, not raising the ceiling.
Replacing friends with LLM chatbots would be like replacing missing nutrients with eating your own feces. Even if you're not put off by the idea, you won't get anything that wasn't already chewed and digested.
Those operators will be angry, but it won't suddenly cause them to think. Instead, someone will point out a convenient target "responsible" for the situation. Migrants, minorities, those queer weirdos, whoever is not like them and can't defend themselves.
Hemaris fuciformis, known as broad-bordered bee hawk-moth sitting on a concrete gravel pavement in full sun, just chilling.
Look at this beauty I've met on the side of the road
Most folks don't actually want unbiased news. They want news biased in ways that match their existing beliefs while appearing objective to outsiders.
Don't you know that nipple is the ultimate embodiment of lust, the very avatar of carnal desires? Otherwise innocent men turn into pervy demons when exposed to a mere suggestion of a female nipple's existence. They must be protected!!!
Contrary to the narrative peddled to us by tech bros, the AI is not going to cause a revolution or bring huge breakthroughs. The value of AI is not in raising the ceiling, it's in raising the floor.
Slow and boring. And doesn't make money.
AI changes only part of a part of the equation - some of the initial cost of implementation. That's peanuts compared to the total cost of ownership. AI is an intern replacement at best. Someone has to micromanage the intern.
An engineering team to write and maintain each tool costs way more than 5k/y, and that's not counting the cost of opportunity. At no scale it's cheaper to build something that's not your core business.