Effy, Sometimes Beautifully Cruel

You deleted it, so the check clearly bounced, man.

Literal nightmare.

😭🫠

Tragic whale tail failure.

Mallow.

Maybe a workable analogy is that if you steal a car, that doesn't make a legal right turn on a red light suddenly illegal because you're doing it in a vehicle you're driving illegally.

Homer, you talk big but can your hands cash that check?

Hey wait there was an alt.sex.cthulhu epic about the extradimensional plushiefication invaders and the wandering fox furry ladies who saved the princess of their latest target world by railing her over and over. I forgot where I was going with this.

Oh we now we’re posting

Looking back over past glories.

As long as we're criticizing FATAL, using the metric system to measure foreskin thickness instead of some weird medieval customary unit of measurement is just one more way FATAL lacks historical accuracy or verisimilitude.

Well, the specific thesis is about how sex enters into games organically even as people are gunshy about games which put the sex upfront, while also discussing how easy it is for sexual content to turn any given game explosive.

In just a few hours of discourse, Bluesky has recreated the "Sex and Sorcery" supplement from Sorcerer and its basic theses. The juice, we still have it, etc.

The little popup when you prove the world is round...

I have not, aha.

I'm built different.

Interacting with an account that thinks "war of attrition" refers solely to maximizing your k/d ratio and ow. Ough. Ouch.

Step 5: [REDACTED]

Step 6: Saved. Works every time. Could do this for Fuala Griffon too.

As for the war crime, please read how the Protocol I of the Geneva Convention defines "hors de combat" and ask yourself if it's a war crime to intentionally kill protected persons.

"And could legally engage".

So, are you aware that the US adopted rules of engagement which, in attempting to limit collateral damage and aid counterinsurgency, necessarily limited the ability to maximize casualties? Would you say those were "stupid rules of engagement"?

Step 1: prove to her she's not a domme.

Step 2: provide a space of emotional safety where she can explore her sexual identity

Step 3: settle down in Sweetwater to avoid war crimes investigators.

Step 4: "accidentally" eject her Gelgoog from a parking orbit into a Sun-encountering one.

Noooooo, that's a very very reductive way of thinking about these matters and it puts you in the same intellectual territory as Pete Hegseth if you try to apply it to the Congress-authorized wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. You also actually described a war crime by implication.

I could have saved Cima too.

"That we are not at war with"

Should the Navy be trying to maximize casualties if Congress passes a specific AUMF? You're mixing laws and ethics together.

The relevant international law around submarines is constructed such that submarines are not an elaborate suicide pact among their crew.

Just gonna throw an idea out there:

The ship to ship battles from Skies of Arcadia, but you have to consider energy-maneuverability constraints. And then there's visual novel sections in between battles which are mostly about coaling stations.

That's right. And I vote!

WALT KELLY'S SAZAE-SAN