Pretty much stopping reading the guardian, mainly because they entertain this idiot, I find the FT more realistic/sensible..am I now officially old?
Pretty much stopping reading the guardian, mainly because they entertain this idiot, I find the FT more realistic/sensible..am I now officially old?
One day politics/history students will study this vile propaganda.
www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
Only Labour, not as one would expect, The Greens, are modernising our electricity grid.
It needs to go faster and further but in my opinion will be set back to the Thatcherite chaos of the eighties if we don't have a second Labour government.
Increased price of ammunition?
When Brexit was slammed for being an act of pure prejudice, all the Brexiters howled about βsovereigntyβ and βtaking back controlβ.
Now, the very same people howl that we should just obey Trump and put our country in the firing line.
They lied about everything. All of it. Every single part.
As someone who likes rules, Starmer's following of them seems right to me. It isn't lawful to attack Iran. It is lawful to defnd states that ddn't attack Iran from them.
/2
The right has lost its collective mind.
What does victory look like?
What is the reason for this war (I am not seeing a legal justification: there obviously isn't one).
Tying yourself to Trump looks foolish.
/1
I think there is a vg case for the Alternative Vote (pluralist majoritarianism) UK's evolving party system - not least as of balanced use for voters on different sides of political spectrum. It allows sincere voting by every voter + strategic choices by those who care
www.ft.com/content/38d8...
We are increasingly moving to "Do It Yourself Alternative Vote" for the voters themselves to work out how to use the current system (often for negative partisanship: get Tories out; who can stop Reform, etc). But makes campaigns as in recent by-election primarily an argument re relative chances.
Agreed, I hate what was happening in Iran, I have known Iranians and want to see that country succeed, but not via Trump's gung-ho method, I don't know, like almost everyone else, how it will pan out.
It's all very Dirty Harry... goodies, baddies, "make my day Mullah!"
Starmer needs now to go hard against it, could expect better polling IMO.
Oh, the ones that have produced ever improving educational outcomes..damn that's where we've been going wrong.
Conversion to comp civilised mine, it's all about funding/happy staff.
Matt doesn't think working class children should have small class sizes.
Oh sad face βΉοΈ
Yes that would explain why he loves people like Hegseth and Noam
Class sizes cost money but solve many problems
Yeah that sounds like the Thatcher years, that UNDERinvestment in education really paying dividends now.
Tosh! I went to a grammar, it was out of date in every regard, in 72 the Wilson gov turned it into a comp, my education thereafter was wonderfully rich and varied, because teachers were happy and free to teach.
I went to a grammar school, it was truly terrible, we were taught everything that would enable us to succeed in the 19c...then in 1972 Wilson's government converted it to a comp, and every bit of the education I received thereafter would and should be as it could be today.
Crushingly predictable. Utterly unjustified by decades of research. A shibboleth in place of a policy.
As always: its not just grammars you're bringing back, its secondary moderns.
And no one wants their kids to go to one. Which is a issue when 75% of kids will do so.
Always missed in this debate. You're making the education of the majority worse, to privilage a small minority.
this is probably the best PR Starmer's had since the election though - the UK population, with unusual unanimity, hates Trump and wants us to have as little to do with his shit-flinging escapades as possible
Labour have introduced so many βgreenβ policies that help towards Net Zero.
Canβt remember the last time Greenβs actually talked about the environment π€·π»ββοΈ
Looks like spring πΌ is here
Pretty certain this is only post 2024
Sweet!
I cannot stand Mason but we need to do some research about how he reported May, Johnson, Truss and Sunak.
He's a typical dales Tory, it seems to me, I live amongst them.
A photo of the front cover of issue 1670 of Private Eye magazine, with the caption βon shelves now.β The main headline reads βTRUMP ATTACKS IRAN,β with a subheading βHOW OPERATION EPIC FURY UNFOLDED.β The cover features four photo panels set in the situation-room with US political figures seated around a table. Speech bubbles add dialogue: βIs the Supreme Leader dead?β followed by βNo, Trump always looks like this!β; βMission accomplished!β answered with βYes, Iβve killed the Epstein storyβ; βWhat happens next?β with the reply βPopular revolt and regime change,β and a follow-up, βIn America?β; and finally, βWhy have you started this war?β answered with βSo that I can stop it,β alongside βIβll ring the Nobel Committee.β
Trump Attacks Iran. How Operation Epic Fury unfoldedβ¦
The new Private Eye is out now.
I'm not Ganesh's biggest fan, but this is perfect.