Andrew Lodge's Avatar

Andrew Lodge

@andrewwj

Curious. Enjoys policy. And other subjects. Ex HMT, BoE, various other places. Based in Canada; but still close to UK

902
Followers
5,724
Following
430
Posts
15.02.2024
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Andrew Lodge @andrewwj

Funny. My dad always used to say he didnโ€™t like Arsenal too much - in the 1980s & 90s as they thought they were bigger than they were (not Man U and Liverpool). We still watched them occasionally.

06.03.2026 02:02 ๐Ÿ‘ 0 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Agreed!

04.03.2026 02:38 ๐Ÿ‘ 0 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Extract from Joel Mokyrโ€™s Enlightened Economy book

Extract from Joel Mokyrโ€™s Enlightened Economy book

Also caused deep discomfort in the 18th century. Edmund Massey thundered in 1722 that inoculation โ€œusurped an authority founded neither in the Laws of Nature nor of Religionโ€ (Iโ€™m just reading Joel Mokyrโ€™s economic history of Enlightenment Britain)

04.03.2026 02:04 ๐Ÿ‘ 8 ๐Ÿ” 1 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Agreed, sad news. He interviewed me for uni entry. Tough but fair questions. Then wrapping up, on what seemed a โ€œfun activitiesโ€ portion he noted Iโ€™d been on a youth orchestra tour to Barcelona, adding โ€œwhat did you note of the Catalonia historical revivalist movement?โ€. Not my smoothest response.

04.03.2026 01:33 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Iโ€™ll look forward to reading it!

04.03.2026 01:24 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Hood was central in the LSE cluster of academics writing about those โ€œaccountabilityโ€ and challenges of accounting & regulation themes (eg Mike Power). Hood had super writing over decades.

04.03.2026 00:41 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Why is CBS focusing on this (in the N. American app)? Thereโ€™s not even a terrorism link.

02.03.2026 23:37 ๐Ÿ‘ 0 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Completely agree about Reconstruction Era. I remember reading Eric Fonerโ€™s โ€œUnfinished Revolutionโ€ and itโ€™s such a depressing & surprising period (for anyone attracted to teleological progress of history). So many innovations in equality, rights. Then lost for 80-odd years.

02.03.2026 02:27 ๐Ÿ‘ 12 ๐Ÿ” 1 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Use of the term โ€œknobโ€ clearly marks out @dankaszeta.bsky.social as British. How more obvious can it be?

01.03.2026 17:51 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Thank you for your attention to this important matter.

01.03.2026 01:33 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

The letters are the actual documents for his writing to her, i.e. Harris replicates these from the letters owned by the Bonham Carter family. Astonishing indiscretion by Asquith.

27.02.2026 18:33 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

This is a pitch-perfect rendition.

26.02.2026 15:08 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Hmmmโ€ฆ not sure thatโ€™s right. If thereโ€™s duplication or skill pooling which can be achieved, surely itโ€™s worth exploring.

25.02.2026 15:00 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

But building capability and integrating AI *is* reform of the civil service. Not sure ehy you say itโ€™s pointless to have reform, then list reforms needed?

25.02.2026 14:53 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

My consumer preference curve for vegetarian food has shifted massively in the last decade thanks to simple education & exploration (curries, baked crispy tofu, Mexican bean dishes etc)

23.02.2026 20:17 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Interesting debate. But @hern.bsky.social - you seem to think about it as a P x Q issue: Govt can increase the price, or restrict quantity. Reasonable for many goods. But with consumer goods, the govt can influence the demand side, ie shift consumer preferences. Like making smoking โ€œless coolโ€ etc

23.02.2026 20:04 ๐Ÿ‘ 0 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Agree with this. Iโ€™m tired of reading here about who is using Twitter , or complaints about it. Not why BlueSky should be used, to my mind.

23.02.2026 11:30 ๐Ÿ‘ 0 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I was just googling (but canโ€™t find right now) - how the Govt classify documents and the implications is public. Canโ€™t remember exactly for HMG, but you can look online. But I know global banks Iโ€™ve worked with had classification systems where the top secret category was physical storage only.

22.02.2026 01:38 ๐Ÿ‘ 0 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

One thought I had on an innocent explanation is that it had been misclassified, i.e. it was not actually Top Secret, and shouldnโ€™t therefore be retained only as a physical copy (or didnโ€™t need to be retained after a number of years)? Not unusual (eg for global banks too) to delete the digital copy.

22.02.2026 01:34 ๐Ÿ‘ 0 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

It sounds very strange. But one thought I had on an innocent explanation is that it had been misclassified, i.e. it was not actually Top Secret, and shouldnโ€™t therefore be retained only as a physical copy (or didnโ€™t need to be retained at all after a certain number of years)? But seems unlikely.

21.02.2026 22:34 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Too sensitive to retain digital copies - greater risk of loss.

21.02.2026 22:30 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Some super confidential documents will be stored only as hard copy to prevent cyber attacks. Itโ€™s standard practice (the same also in some banks Iโ€™ve worked in).

21.02.2026 22:29 ๐Ÿ‘ 2 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I hope you continue to post here. I find the debates and articulation of arguments and analysis by high-quality journalists (eg FT, Guardian, Politico, WSJ), academics and commentators- such as yourself - a great advantage of BlueSky. But it does attract numerous rude people. (Block the worst!)

18.02.2026 03:50 ๐Ÿ‘ 3 ๐Ÿ” 1 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Thank you for posting here. I appreciate good journalists posting on BlueSky though there does seem to be an inordinate number of vicious responses. An advantage of BlueSky is that you can block people out. (But I can see that might not be a comfort fully).

18.02.2026 03:31 ๐Ÿ‘ 2 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Good friendsโ€ฆ? ;)

(Agree on Stata)

15.02.2026 19:10 ๐Ÿ‘ 2 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Oh, this is priceless

13.02.2026 23:02 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Awful luck.

12.02.2026 19:58 ๐Ÿ‘ 0 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Agree. A govt with a deliberate direction will look to build a policy platform to win next time. So that means an overall portfolio of โ€œmostly left, a few centristโ€ policies. But one dragged there wonโ€™t have control to build a balanced portfolio. Itโ€™ll be an amalgam of backbenchersโ€™ hopes and fears.

12.02.2026 03:14 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Incredible itโ€™s still like this. I remember 20 years ago (!) during the set up of the legislatively independent Statistics Authority and โ€œofficial statisticsโ€, the feedback on consultation from one banker was โ€œsod that, no point if no one can get the stats, just spend the money fixing the websiteโ€

11.02.2026 00:00 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Yes, youโ€™re right - thatโ€™s the issue. Itโ€™s funny, but irritating too.

10.02.2026 18:36 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0