Not to be flippant, but couldn’t the maintainer just close such a PR if they suspected it’s heavily vibe coded? I do understand that this may not scale super well for larger projects that receive lots of contributions. But at least right now it seems easy to quickly spot a fully AI contribution.
08.02.2026 03:17
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Yes. Bluesky lets me hide individual replies to my posts that I don’t like for all users. I can also block people or limit replies only to followers. I could also set up a custom Labeler if I wanted to do more complex filtering.
27.01.2026 20:24
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Yes, Bluesky has several tools for personal moderation of accounts/individual posts. I can choose to hide certain replies from my post that will then be hidden on the site
25.01.2026 04:46
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Yup good point
25.01.2026 02:14
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Yes, beyond that I have to massage the response data a little bit more, but not impossible
25.01.2026 02:06
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 2
📌 0
Hah nice, handled by using JSX though
25.01.2026 02:00
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
This is cool, haven’t heard about this. Interested to reading more
25.01.2026 01:57
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Adding Bluesky-powered comments to any website in five minutes
Long live the open web!
My version would likely be hard to integrate into a WordPress site, but take a look at this version that I mentioned in the post. Should be pretty easy to pull in from a script tag: www.coryzue.com/writing/blue...
24.01.2026 22:18
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Nope, not yet but it’s definitely possible to in the future
24.01.2026 21:29
👍 3
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Testing out a comment! ✍️
24.01.2026 19:11
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
I added a Bluesky comment section to my blog
How I embedded Bluesky replies directly on my site
I embedded a comment section from Bluesky on my blog. Check it out here, including some details on how I did it:
micahcantor.com/blog/bluesky...
24.01.2026 18:56
👍 45
🔁 6
💬 52
📌 0
I rebuilt my blog with React Server Components
A retrospective on my experience migrating this website to React 19 and Parcel
I rebuilt my blog using React Server Components and Parcel as a static site generator. I wrote about my mostly positive impressions, plus a few rough edges:
micahcantor.com/blog/rsc-rew...
22.01.2026 02:31
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Don’t tempt me into trying to hack my toothbrush
03.01.2026 04:52
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Mikal Bridges is averaging career highs in steals (2.0/game) and blocks (1.1/game). How has Mike Brown unlocked his defense, and does he have an All-Defense case?
08.12.2025 03:24
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
D rating is highly dependent on who’s playing on the other team. Yabu mainly plays against the other teams bench. Also could be variance since hasn’t played many minutes.
06.12.2025 00:35
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Not sure what you need exactly but I know you can use it to give each device a stable ip address. If everything is on the Tailscale network you can use those addresses
28.10.2025 22:32
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Tailscale?
28.10.2025 22:10
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Haskell’s error messages are horrific. Their language is mostly aimed at a very academic audience and is one of the main reasons the language is so inaccessible.
19.07.2025 21:07
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 2
📌 0
Analogous in a way to cursive handwriting
07.04.2025 18:39
👍 4
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Everyone gets bidirectional BFS wrong
People really need to stop blindly copying code from the Internet.
What happens when LLMs train on code that's popular but wrong? zdimension.fr/everyone-get... explores this, with interactive diagrams exploring the error
04.02.2025 19:24
👍 85
🔁 19
💬 3
📌 1
Abstract syntax trees but they’re actually made out of…published abstracts?
04.02.2025 22:15
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Data.IntMap
Probably you should use vector (hackage.haskell.org/package/vector) or Text.
And if you need efficient add/delete then maybe IntMap (hackage.haskell.org/package/cont...)
20.01.2025 02:43
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Emacs lisp would be another example, though that language is uglier than scheme
17.01.2025 03:37
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
GNU guix basically takes this to the logical extreme. It’s a whole OS that is configurable and scriptable in Scheme.
17.01.2025 03:35
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
There is mutation via set! in Scheme but it’s easily avoidable and not idiomatic.
But otherwise it seems to meet your criteria. Easy to parse, human-readable, embeddable, interpretable.
17.01.2025 03:34
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 2
📌 0
Is this just Scheme?
17.01.2025 03:11
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
(Or replace unit with the fields of the type you’re creating)
10.01.2025 22:32
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
It’s annoying, but can be alleviated by following the pattern of wrapping *all* types in a module, and then exposing a function create : unit -> t from that module.
Particularly important for record types because otherwise type inference sucks ass
10.01.2025 22:31
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 2
📌 0