Wow. I didn't know that.
@carlosrossa
Physicist PhD in photovoltaic systems Researcher Climate change Solar Energy Beatles Nature Portfolio: https://www.nature.com/articles/s44172-023-00119-7 my book: https://tinyurl.com/carlosrossa LinkedIn: https://tinyurl.com/incarlosrossa Born π§π· Living πͺπΈ
Wow. I didn't know that.
Detailed fingerprint, without dust.
Detailed fingerprint, with dust between ridges.
The setting sun in Madrid, Spain. The sun appears round behind some clouds, with the sky a bit white, hazy. There are some trees between the observer and the sun.
This week, Saharan dust has been drifting across the Iberian Peninsula. Youβve likely heard about PM2.5/10 particles-their impact on PV panels or the respiratory issues etc. But how tiny are they really?
Enough to fill the spaces between fingerprints' ridges.
π§ͺ
ππ‘
Humanβinduced climate change may have intensified the mechanisms behind the 2024 flash floods in Valencia, Spain, according to a modelling study published in Nature Communications. π§ͺ
Finally, the upscale effect of wind speed losses was further confirmed by CFD simulations of an entirely floating PV plant by a new study.
π§ͺ
ππ‘
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Letβs see if the mass production of copper-based solar cells, recently announced by LONGi, will lead us somewhere. At least we won't be competing with the jewelry industry anymore! π
π§ͺ
ππ‘
www.pv-magazine.com/2026/01/13/s...
The target matters: insightful research on how to properly communicate climate change to a wider audience.
π§ͺ
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
At this point, the coffin is already covered in nails.
π§ͺ
eu.usatoday.com/story/news/p...
Totally agree!
Events of extreme low energy production are expected to increase even in optimistic climate change scenarios, affecting at least one-third of regions. In this context, PV stands out as the most reliable renewable energy source, provided that climate goals are met.
π§ͺ
ππ‘
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
βWe are witnessing a major, unstoppable shift, and to ignore this is to look elsewhere.
π§ͺ
ππ‘
www.nature.com/articles/d41...
The Chinese manufacturer LONGi is making it again. Well done!
π§ͺ
ππ‘
www.pv-magazine.com/2025/11/26/l...
In a recent article published in Nature, scientists from LONGi have revealed how they achieved the record efficiency in a single PV cell. They have been successfully breaking the world efficiency record year by yearβtheir own record, by the way.
π§ͺ
ππ‘
www.pv-magazine.com/2025/11/20/l...
A study in Brazil's Minas Gerais (a region bigger than Spain or France) shows Transfer Learning is enabled by neighbouring station data to predict solar irradiation in data-scarce areas, despite that same data being unhelpful for existing local models.
π§ͺ ππ‘
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
This study unveils a hitherto underestimated dust effect: the thermal loss in PV panels is disproportionately governed by the chemical composition of the settled particles, not just their mass.
π§ͺ
ππ‘
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Link for the paper π
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/...
UAE researchers achieved a sensorless approach to monitor PV panel temperature. Their novel model accurately estimates module operating temperature using only the open-circuit or maximum power point voltage, eliminating the need for physical sensors.
π§ͺ
ππ‘
www.pv-magazine.com/2025/11/12/s...
A terrain with only a few meters of variation is enough to boost wind speed at the lower zone. It occurs via the vertical displacement of the Low-Level Jet, a phenomenon observed and quantified in an operational wind power plant.
π§ͺ
ππ‘
wes.copernicus.org/articles/10/...
Coming back here 10 months after these two posts to bring some update.
π§ͺ
ππ‘
www.pv-magazine.com/2025/10/21/m...
Understanding the dust impact on PV systems in the Sudano-Sahelian region (Burkina Faso). The detailed analysis shows power cuts of up to 35% at 20 g/m2. The accumulation rate is high at ~40 g/m2 per day. High winds offer crucial natural cleaning.
π§ͺ
ππ‘
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
This isn't the usual topic I post about here, but it's a really interesting subject nonethelessβboth for future researchers and current lab leads.
Mental health truly matters.
Recently published on @natureportfolio.nature.com
π§ͺ
www.nature.com/articles/d41...
Monocrystalline silicon solar cells hit 50β60% efficiency at 30β50 K, beating the ShockleyβQueisser limit by suppressing thermal losses. This could potentially power future lunar mining robots and deep-space probes.
π§ͺ
ππ‘
link.springer.com/article/10.1...
πΎπΎ π
π§ͺ
Just prove your point, "fact checker."
Seeing images doesn't make you a specialist on climate or whatever you claim to be.
Thank goodness people are not throwing away their PV panels to install nuclear reactors in their houses instead. Based on your logic...
Your vision is limited by the whole thing.
Or, if this is the problem, we could keep burning fossil fuels until we find another energy source.
Just don't be a troll and be more respectful of people you don't know. Don't be a dead weight on the earth spreading a fool's opinion.
Consider the ratio of power to land required. For example, a wind generator is better than solar. But it's not just a matter of how much power is produced, and you know it.
Nuclear? Yes, it's intermittent, occupies less land, etc. But what about the costs? The wastes?
You've been ignoring the core of the question since the beginning. You had to prove your point, but you couldn't. We all know this is not propaganda; it's science. You believe the opposite, but you can't prove it. You just bring images, or in other words, it's just your opinion. Where is the proof?
He won't.
But, just in case, he should have the opportunity to show it for a bigger audience like the science and energy sky feed. People who, according to him, reproduce wind and solar propaganda like parrots. His moment to prove that all of us are wrong.
π§ͺ
ππ‘
By the way, the onus of the proof is yours. With numbers, real science. Not photos, opinions, outliers.
By the way, even wind people say something about the ratio power/land against solar PV. The difference is that they're just kidding, not being a fool like you and your "big knowledge".
Really? Your point is to compare energy production with... Nuclear? Why are you supposing that me or anyone here who works with PV doesn't know these numbers?
How long does it take you to make this big discovery, about energy production?
I was expecting something else from you. How disappointing
The onus of the proof is yours. You're saying all wind and solar stuff is propaganda. But rather than explain it to me, publish it through a specialized publication. This way your assumption could gain some credibility. Otherwise, it's just faith, and faith is nothing more than your own opinion.