I know it's a stressful environment to be in, and slips are easy to make on the spot, but the executive chair saying that Boulby mine is 'up in Daresbury' makes me wonder if she meant Daresbury lab or Boulby underground lab. More public detail is needed on the specific sources of cost overruns.
05.03.2026 21:43
π 0
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
It was really great to be joined by a huge group of fellows and early career researchers from all over the UK packing out the lords and commons select committee meetings. It was a full room on both days and the committees understood the strength of feeling in the community.
04.03.2026 19:07
π 0
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
STFC's budget problems go much wider than the LHCb project at Cern, but it's significant that Michele Dougherty said withdrawing funds would weaken UK's international standing
Why? Because DSIT has said it's paying attention to that issue
...
04.03.2026 18:54
π 2
π 4
π¬ 1
π 0
Jon is right we would try to get back in, but a delay to the upgrade risks missing the schedule - hl-lhc has strict time constraints and we need to be building this *now* to guarantee success.
04.03.2026 18:47
π 1
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
Some thoughts on this : Michele again conflates the cern subscription with our ability to do science. By cutting lhcb's upgrade but paying the subscription, we are paying for something our researchers can't benefit from either in publications or technology transfer.
04.03.2026 18:46
π 6
π 1
π¬ 1
π 0
Fears over STFC cost-savings plan aired since September 2025.
Oversight body repeatedly raised concerns over βlack of transparencyβ with research community.
www.researchprofessionalnews.com/rr-news-uk-r...
02.03.2026 08:13
π 4
π 4
π¬ 0
π 0
Today @astroroyalscot.bsky.social @jonbutterworth.bsky.social and I gave evidence to the Science & Technology Committee on the proposed #STFC cuts.
Chaired by @chionwurah.bsky.social the committee were clearly well briefed and asked strong questions of Prof Michele Dougherty. An excellent summary:
04.03.2026 16:55
π 9
π 2
π¬ 0
π 1
Rows of people wearing orange lanyards in a House of Commons committee hearing. At the front is Catherine sporting her "I'm about to perform an appendectomy" mask and looking particularly snazzy.
Here is my run-down of today's Science, Information & Technology Committee hearing (House of Commons) where @jonbutterworth.bsky.social @si-wills.bsky.social & I argued for no funding cuts, & Prof. Michele Doughtery explained why they were needed. The public gallery again packed with physicists ππ©βπ¬βοΈ
04.03.2026 15:02
π 111
π 37
π¬ 6
π 7
ukri
04.03.2026 14:52
π 0
π 1
π¬ 1
π 0
Some very notable statements by Patrick Vallance about the STFC 'cost reductions' that are decimating the grants programme at STFC
Hope for UK physics and astronomy community?
He told the Lords science committee he was βdetermined that UKRI must find a way to look after PPANβ
...
04.03.2026 10:32
π 2
π 2
π¬ 1
π 1
Parliamentlive.tv
Science and Technology Committee
Patrick Vallance at the Science and Technology Committee yesterday used the terms "general research" and "specific research" for buckets 1 and 2/3.
I wonder if the term "general research" is much better for bucket 1 to make sense of why QR is there? Thoughts?
parliamentlive.tv/event/index/...
04.03.2026 11:25
π 1
π 1
π¬ 1
π 0
People sat in rows a committee hearing - all smartly dressed
Here is my run-down of today's Science and Technology Committee hearing (House of Lords) where "considerable disquiet in the science community" was raised with Sir Patrick Vallance. Really great to see the public gallery packed with physicists!
03.03.2026 15:21
π 49
π 10
π¬ 2
π 1
Why move ppan to epsrc, facilities are a better fit :)
04.03.2026 07:57
π 2
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
Good thread on the latest bucketology
03.03.2026 20:36
π 0
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
This could be a good thing if managed well, but prior experience with ppan makes me nervous. 'fewer partitions but now councils wide'. Ties into sir Ians desire for flexibility.
03.03.2026 10:58
π 0
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
I think even definitions aside lumping it all into a single bucket alongside subscriptions makes it easier to trade off rising costs in parts of the programme.
03.03.2026 10:57
π 0
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
Things worthy of note : QR is lumped into bucket one despite not being applicant led, curiosity driven research. Infrastructure is laundered through bucket four. As no detail is on the right of the Sankey plot it tells us nothing new.
03.03.2026 10:40
π 0
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
Top academics warn UK physics cuts threaten effort to boost economy
More than 50 heads of departments tell science minister that changes risk undermining crucial tech growth fields
"Planned cuts to physics and astronomy funding threaten to undermine a core UK government strategy to harness innovation to boost economic growth, leading researchers have warned ministers."
Thanks @financialtimes.com for covering this really important story
ποΈ: www.ft.com/content/a235...
02.03.2026 07:27
π 99
π 39
π¬ 1
π 2
Open letter to the Science Minister from Heads of Physics
Heads of Physics departments have expressed concern about UKRI funding changes.
An open letter has been sent to Lord Vallance from 57 heads of UK physics departments and institutes, including all of the heads of physics departments of the Russell group.
www.iop.org/about/news/o...
02.03.2026 07:54
π 16
π 11
π¬ 0
π 2
How does this policy change impact differently across the sector? Are early career researchers more or less likely to be impacted? Has an equality impact assessment been done?
And how is UKRI structured to ensure that the disciplinary expertise and experience is maintained?
26.02.2026 16:05
π 3
π 1
π¬ 1
π 0
Long read: Researchersβ concerns are mounting as news drips out of the research councils about cuts and freezes ahead of a major funding restructuring. But does the buckets approach even hold water? @jgro-the.bsky.social reports #research #AcademicSky
https://ow.ly/x7yE50YlT4I
26.02.2026 08:10
π 5
π 3
π¬ 0
π 1
Well, it's been a busy day prepping for my upcoming appearance in Westminsterπ. The chocolate is all gone. This thread contains evidenced statistics to support the continued (not cut) funding for UK particle, astro and nuclear physics (PPAN). Thanks to everyone who contributed today! π§΅
01.03.2026 19:23
π 49
π 17
π¬ 3
π 3
Planetarium Bochum sunset view, deep orange fading to dark blue. Saturn, Merkur and Venus are marked - tiny speaks in the twilight sky.
How are the #planetaryparade fans doing tonight? Clear skies here so I took up the challenge!
πJupiter (easy - right of the moon)
πVenus (bright on the W horizon)
πSaturn (trickier - need to know where to look)
π€·ββοΈMercury (in hiding)
π
ββοΈNeptune and Uranus (needs π)
π· @planetariumbochum.bsky.social
28.02.2026 18:52
π 70
π 15
π¬ 5
π 1
www.researchprofessionalnews.com/rr-news-euro...
19.02.2026 16:04
π 1
π 0
π¬ 0
π 1
Today the astro-community discussed the devastating proposed 30% cuts to our research funding, cuts that will be offsetting (some of the) rising costs at UK facilities that we don't use. Hard not to feel victimised when those same facilities make a fanfare announcement about an expensive facelift. π
16.02.2026 15:04
π 56
π 20
π¬ 5
π 1