(i did it; yay)
@heartpunk
trying to see if we can recover programming language semantics from implementations @ patreon.com/heartpunk 39 y/o, MDNI ๐ she/they/bitch(es) alt for pfp: the soul of the rose by john waterhouse alt for banner: sappho and erinna by simeon solomon
(i did it; yay)
hmph! (ok thank u)
best font for lean/etc.???
someone tell me to go get a breafkast and a coffee???
anyone who's been inside google fully does tho
still wroking on my main project from my pinned post!!!!
extracting semantics of PLs and similar things from impls
nothing klovar
some context windows just have a lil self esteem crisis and need a pick me up ๐คท๐ผโโ๏ธ
semantics extraction stuff, a much better version of it
(it amuses me that some ppl may think i'm like unselfawarely going all hypomanic and risking detachment from reality etc etc etc and joke's on u i always worried about that in all things always!! even now as i enjoy it agghhhh!!!!!!)
can't believe i'm doing another all nighter so soon but this,,, this fucking proof y'allllllll
WE ARE SO CLOSEEEEEEEE
yea, this sorta stuff is really hard to excise and i just don't try to rn (upside of solo research stuff!)
agree
Notation abuse is just a parametric typeclass instance
like it's a different statement even, just same goal in practice
indeeeed
this is a much better version entirely tbqh
nuh uhhhhhhhh
also: pancake desire
nonsense is going on
wat
p*y*le, gosh
stake; can pyle
annnnnn
cake
of the
pan
wanna pancake
like, did i submit something i am less proud of now? yes!
is this a better version? fuck yes! transparently so. so glad finally found it. wild how much luck comes into this.
up so late but proof is proofing so well and poc is pocing so well and fjadsl;fjlkadsfkladsfkl agghhhhhh this gives me LIFEEEE this makes me feel invincible to bad feedback this progress is so solid
cick damera
(i'm really not sure where that limit will be tho! i am not confident of much of any change beyond where we are, but i know that these things are hard to imagine in advance from experience, so i also expect that a lot a lot of change is *possible*
anyway rambling lol)
fwiw, a good many of the earliest economists focused on ai didn't really think it would likely end all employment either
my guess is more relational work, some material, some service, but w/increasing focus on paying for human engagement as other needs, insomuch as they are automatable, are
one of my strongest beliefs is that continuing to learn new things as you age is essential -- no matter what you decide to learn about.
There is a kind of death that begins when you decide you know all that you need to know about the world.