1/12 New working paper! The pioneer penalty in higher education seems to be real. Our new study examines how student biases influence course selection and provides cautionary lessons for role model advertising.
Paper: osf.io/preprints/so...
1/12 New working paper! The pioneer penalty in higher education seems to be real. Our new study examines how student biases influence course selection and provides cautionary lessons for role model advertising.
Paper: osf.io/preprints/so...
Amin Hussainโs work shows how to carefully balance incentives for innovation while protecting consumer welfare.
Reach out ur you have futher Qโs
Although framed in health economics, Aminโs results are highly generalizable.
The paper could easily evolve into a pure theory paper with broad applications. Itโs a step forward in understanding pricing and incentives in dynamic markets.
Amin doesnโt just propose a mechanismโhe provides an algorithm to find solutions that:
โข Minimize price variance
โข Minimize variance in consumer surplus
โข Minimize the number of market segments
Practical and flexible. ๐ก
But thereโs more: Amin extends the model to the post-patent market.
His framework allows regulators to leverage future consumer surplus to incentivize trials for drugs with long-term social valueโkey for conditions neglected by pure market forces.
The result?
๐ฏ Manufacturers are incentivized to run trials for all socially profitable indications.
๐ฏ Consumer surplus is maximized.
๐ฏ Rare diseases and orphan drug trialsโoften ignored under IBPโbecome feasible, improving overall welfare.
Amin builds on Bergemann et al. (2015, AER) to model a dynamic setting:
1๏ธโฃ Manufacturers first decide whether to run trials (at a cost) for new indications.
2๏ธโฃ A regulator smartly segments the market for profit-maximizing pricingโbalancing incentives and surplus.
Enter Amin Hussainโs job-market paper. ๐จ
Amin proposes a regulatory mechanism that goes beyond IBP. It:
โ
Incentivizes trials for socially valuable indications.
โ
Protects consumer surplus.
โ
Ensures access for patients.
Hereโs how it works ๐
Indication-based pricing sets prices based on the condition treated, aligning cost with value.
Sounds ideal, right? Not quite.
IBP risks letting manufacturers capture too much surplus, leaving patients and payers worse off. A balancing act is needed. โ๏ธ
One key issue: uniform pricing for multi-indication drugs.
๐ Patients with less profitable conditions face limited access.
๐ Manufacturers lose incentives to run trials for rare or low-margin diseases.
A better approach? Indication-based pricing (IBP). But thereโs a catchโฆ
๐ The pharmaceutical market reached $1.48T in 2022, but skyrocketing drug development costs are shifting focus to multi-indication drugsโexisting drugs repurposed for new conditions. While promising, they bring new challenges for pricing and access.
Letโs dive in! ๐งต
Hereโs a suggested Twitter thread to summarize Amin Hussainโs job-market paper:
Amin Hussain is on the market this year. His JMP makes important contributions to the pricing of multi-use drugs. Let me explain why
sites.google.com/view/aminhus...
We are hiring a a Senior Lecturer/Associate Professor in economics with a focus on environmental and natural resource economics โ come join us!
at least it was a Norwegian...