Chris Halliday

That’s probably the very first time either of those words have been applied to me 😂 Thank you 🙏

Had my first threat of violence over on Instagram for a while, from some forgettable twat in whose head I’ve apparently been living rent free for some time. No idea who he is or what I’ve done to upset him, but based on his extremely homophobic language, he’s a shitty person, so I’m a happy camper 😂

Oooh, cool! 😎

Oh dear 🤭

We like you, we just don’t like the absolute clown show in power ❤️

Owen’s a good guy 😊

Last day for this excellent giveaway!

So…they’ve invented the tree?

Well, fuck 🤦‍♂️

Of course, you don’t give a shit about what the community wants. I forgot.

The “gender critical” crowd are absolute hypocrites. They pretend they’re for women while throwing any biological female who doesn’t fit their limited leads of womanhood under the bus.
Give them proof, they continually shift the goalposts and claim it’s not valid.

“Genderists” 😂

“NoNe Of ThOsE pEoPlE aRe RePuTaBle ScIeNtIsTs” 🤡
Yep, I called it. Anything that proves you wrong suddenly “isn’t valid”.
You asked for the science, you got it. You asked for scientists, you got them.
Your constantly shifting standards of proof shows the bad faith of your arguments.

Wait, you’re using *wikipedia* as a reference? 😂
But Scientific American isn’t a reliable source? 😂
Consistency isn’t your strong suit, is it?

Clinical geneticist Paul James (Royal Melbourne Hospital),
John Achermann (UCL Institute of Child Health),
Arthur Arnold (University of California),
Eric Vilain (University of California Center for Gender-Based Biology),
Vincent Harley (MIMR-PHI Institute for Medical Research).
You’re welcome 😂

That’s a lie. The term “intersex” is the preferred term used by the community itself.
Really, that was fucking weak. It takes less than ten seconds to find out.

I imagine that anything that disagrees with you is “not considered a trustworthy source” 😂

Oh, so you’re moving the goalposts now? First you claim that your views are scientific, then when I disprove that, you start going the legislative route 😂
Which is it? Because the NIH is definitely talking about the science, and it says you’re wrong.

Everything You Always Wanted to Know about Sexes What defines a sex? Although we tend to think there are only two - males and females - there are many different ways to mix and match the attributes of sexes

The National Institute of Health disagrees with you too;

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC...

Sex Redefined: The Idea of 2 Sexes Is Overly Simplistic Biologists now think there is a larger spectrum than just binary female and male

Weird that respected journals like Scientific American and New Scientist disagree with you 🤔

www.scientificamerican.com/article/sex-...

Are you actually claiming that intersex people don’t exist? 😂

It actually *is* science, dipshit. I’m not going to educate you on chromosomal variation or the wide variety of intersex people that exist, because your simplistic views on genome expression are sadly out of date. If you cared, you’d look it up. But you don’t, because you’re happy with your bigotry.

Every MAGA accusation is a confession.

I’m not taking science advice from a guy who looks like he’s legally required to stay a specific minimum distance from schools.

No lies detected

Oh, great, the crazy is catching 🤦‍♂️

Really nicely put!

It’s annoying. We’re FB friends, but the algorithm hides stuff like this and I end up missing out on stuff and feeling like a crappy friend!

FFS! 🤦‍♂️