Paul Rowe's Avatar

Paul Rowe

@pauldrowe

Applied logician. Polyglot. Interested in curiosity, not dogma.

647
Followers
202
Following
284
Posts
30.07.2023
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Paul Rowe @pauldrowe

I think that’s healthy to promote respect among disciplines that don’t interface.

These days, I think too many people trained in STEM disciplines revile the humanities and social sciences. And sometimes vice versa.

06.03.2026 03:16 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Jfc, Jesse!

06.03.2026 03:03 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Ok, I’m curious. What kind of theory? What was it?

Because we all learn too that there are topics that speak to us and others that will continue to seem like dark arts (which I suspect your theory book will seem to me).

06.03.2026 03:00 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

That is legit a *very* challenging read, (he says, as if he has fully engaged with the text).

06.03.2026 02:48 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Niiiice!

06.03.2026 02:47 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Did you assign him Thomas Nagel’s “What Is It Like to Be a Bat”?

06.03.2026 02:43 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0

I feel like I should be able to come up with things from my life but I’m coming up blank.

06.03.2026 02:27 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

My favorite Rapaport moment was when he was on Celebrity Wheel of Fortune and just bombed a response. He knew it, but was so excited it was about Tiffany Haddish that he added “my girl” in front of her name, violating official rules. Sajak couldn’t give it to him.

04.03.2026 01:29 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

The rhythm must be: “Bernoulli Bros. and Leibniz and Newton Circus.”

02.03.2026 01:25 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Post a pic you took, no context, to bring some zen to the feed.

28.02.2026 03:48 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Yes, I realize steak usually means beef. The pun was too much to resist.

25.02.2026 02:18 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

“Let them eat steak!”

25.02.2026 02:18 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

As an American (and mathematician), I have had numerous people comment to me about how my silverware use was decidedly European. It’s just how I was raised, so I was confused the first few times.

24.02.2026 02:23 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

I love how she cultivates the pause where she tries to hold back laughing at herself.

23.02.2026 22:58 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Preview
Instagram Create an account or log in to Instagram - Share what you're into with the people who get you.

Are you aware of Mom’s Dad Jokes? (www.instagram.com/moms.dadjoke...)

23.02.2026 22:52 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Screenshot of NY Times Spelling Bee showing that CONCOMITANT is not in the word list.

Screenshot of NY Times Spelling Bee showing that CONCOMITANT is not in the word list.

Screenshot of Merriam Webster Dictionary entry for the word CONCOMITANT.

Screenshot of Merriam Webster Dictionary entry for the word CONCOMITANT.

I sometimes post funny math words that aren’t in the NY Times Spelling Bee, but this seems like an actual oversight.

21.02.2026 13:43 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
20.02.2026 15:55 👍 7 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0

That is decidedly important information!

21.02.2026 00:39 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
A painting of a lamp being illuminated by the orange glow of a sunset through a window

A painting of a lamp being illuminated by the orange glow of a sunset through a window

The day wanes

Oil on Cradled Panel. 12" X 18".

#art #painting #artist #oilpainting #oilonpanel #lamp #sunset #interior

19.02.2026 17:01 👍 329 🔁 27 💬 6 📌 2

But also, I’m glad there’s a space for explicating others’ work because that will always be necessary, however much we might hope it wouldn’t be.

And it’s super valuable!

20.02.2026 02:39 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

I sometimes wonder if stuff like this is an artifact of trying to please reviewers when standing one’s ground is better. Maybe not in this case, but I’ve seen it in other cases (including my own).

20.02.2026 02:36 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0

The most effective second person narrative I’ve encountered is Italo Calvino’s If on a Winter’s Night a Traveler. But even that had to be uncomfortably aware of the awkwardness of it to make it work.

20.02.2026 01:58 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Post image

Unique Forms of Continuity in Space, by Umberto Boccioni, 1913, (cast 1931 or 1934), 📸 by Wang Zhao

19.02.2026 23:03 👍 5303 🔁 839 💬 20 📌 28

Oh that sounds like a distinct possibility. But frustrating that the ellipsis in that screen grab occurs right at the threshold in question.

19.02.2026 18:33 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Wait, by finiteness do you mean that there are only seven such numbers? If so, I’m with you: I have few intuitions, which I wouldn’t trust in this space.

19.02.2026 02:47 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Me too! (I also missed 1 on my first try, so there’s that 🤦‍♂️)

19.02.2026 02:32 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Yes that’s what I meant. To be specific, I think the seven numbers that satisfy the property are: 1, 2, 6, 12, 60, 360, 2520.

19.02.2026 02:23 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Please re-ask

19.02.2026 02:18 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Ok I finally came back to this. In light of the oeis link you posted, I think a way to phrase this is to say that only seven numbers n satisfy a_{n+1}(n) = 2*n for a_n in that oeis sequence, and 360 is one of them.

19.02.2026 01:39 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0

When I first started my job I kept hearing about people traveling to Rome (yay!), New York (boo!)

18.02.2026 16:56 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0