It was very great to have you here!
04.03.2026 00:00
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
It was very great to have you here!
Just published: our introduction to the history of peer review in the humanities! (with Marie-Gabrielle Verbergt) link.springer.com/article/10.1...
Very happy to share that my monograph on the negotiation of global asymmetries of science has been recently published! bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/colonial-leg...
Four articles from our Special Issue "The Past and Present of Humanities Peer Review" in Minerva are available now. Two more articles, along with a general introduction, will follow shortly! link.springer.com/collections/...
In next week's Jour Fixe, @alexcsiszar.bsky.social (Harvard University) will present on "Exporting publication standards: Eugene Garfield's global travels"
www.rmz.hu-berlin.de...
29.10.25, 11 CET, join us in person/ via zoom (link on website)!
@ibi-hu.bsky.social
Certainly -- just send an email.
Thanks for the kind words. I thought this paper was quite interesting: it's great to learn more about the process by which exchange of separate copies gradually morphed into the platform that it became.
I'm looking forward to speaking in this series on Oct 29!
Great to see you've made it to Paris! May we follow your lead in time.
I at last got to sit down and read “Limits of the Numerical” ed. @annaalexandrova.bsky.social, Stephen John, and @cnewf.bsky.social. This is a great book. It pushes against some of our received STS wisdom about quantification in super productive ways. Essential!
press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/bo...
Onilne workshop on quantification! The Society for the Study of Measurement is delighted to host an event on the philosophy, sociology, and history of quantification across the sciences on August 9. Free with registration. #philsci #philsky #histsci #histtech #sts #sociology 🧪 tinyurl.com/5rn7p7sk
This looks so great. I will get this now, and maybe my kiddo gets to read it too.
Yes, but the legal situation is extremely tricky -- even if the cases against these companies are winnable (they well might not be), winning might come at big cost: e.g. endangering various fair use exemptions. We should be hugely concerned about IP & GAI, but copyright probably not the way to fight
Caution to Photographers — At Bow Street, on Saturday, Sidney Powell, and a dealer in photographic prints, of Chandos Street, Covent Garden, appeared to answer a summons at the instances of Mr. Ernest Gambark, charging him first, with having copied, or caused to be copied, an engraving of the "Horse Fair" without his consent; and secondly, with exposing the same for sale. Mr. Gambitt said he gave £1,600 for the picture and copyright, and 800 guineas for the engraving. The defendant and others immediately laid hold of his engravings, photographed them, and injured his sale. He was determined to prosecute in every case. The magistrate reserved his decision on the point of law as be the construction of the set. "Caution to Photographers," Carlisle Examiner and North Western Advertiser - Tuesday 04 November 1862, 4.
I've long been fascinated by the fact that wood engravings for newspaper illustrations were often based on photographs (e.g. of the Crimean War front) in the 1860s, but I hadn't really considered that photography would be used to reproduce/pirate engravings this early! #needtoreadmorearthistory
The Democrats on the House Science Committee have set up a website to collect stories from fired federal employees, anonymously if desired democrats-science.house.gov/sciencefirings
At the beginning of the semester, if questions of AI in academia are stressing you out, could I suggest reading through our most recent set of essays? online.ucpress.edu/hsns/issue/5...
A stylized image of the Earth with North America at its center, overlaid with bright colors. Two scales alongside the image relate the colors to sea surface temperature (°C) and sea ice concentration (%). Source: https://www.nsf.gov/news/mmg/mmg_disp.jsp?med_id=61163
My first new initiative at @arlnews.bsky.social!
Book-length studies of scholarly communities can signal changes in research practice, but library leaders are often too busy to read them. This series aims to distill actionable insights in the key of epistemic diversity.
www.arl.org/blog/introdu...
Shared my doubts with a @nytimes.com journalist about how much I think the FDA’s new front-of-package labels are going to improve consumers’ health, quoted in his article here, “F.D.A. Proposes New Food Labels to Detail Sugar, Fat and Salt Levels”: www.nytimes.com/2025/01/14/h....
#FromLabelToTable
Image Text: Call for Proposals February 2026 Special Section: “Historical Practices” Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences Section Editors: Melinda Baldwin and Brigid Vance The “Essays & Reviews” editors of Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences are seeking proposals for short essays on “Historical Practices” as part of a special section to run in February 2026. We are looking for authors of recent monographs or other substantial research projects on the history of science (published/released in 2018 or later) to reflect on the historical work that led to their final product. This could include, but is not limited to: the research methods you used; languages or techniques you had to master to finish the project; how you thought about your engagement with the historiography; your approach to writing; decisions about how to present and release non-monograph works; how the project changed as you worked on it. Essays should be roughly 800-1000 words in length. Drafts of essays need to be submitted by August 1, 2025 in order to meet February publication deadlines. Short proposals can be emailed directly to the section editors, and should include: 1) The title and publication information of your book or project 2) A one-sentence articulation of the project’s central argument or contribution 3) The geographical region treated in the book/project 4) The temporal period treated in the book/project 5) The major research methods employed in the project (archival research, oral histories, engagement with physical artifacts and material culture, etc.) Send proposals or queries to Melinda Baldwin (mbaldwin@umd.edu) and Brigid Vance (brigid.e.vance@lawrence.edu). We will choose proposals with the goal of achieving broad geographical, temporal, and topical coverage. Early career scholars who have recently published a first book-length work are especially encouraged to send proposals, as are scholars outside of academia.
Fellow #histSTM scholars! The "Essays and Reviews" section of Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences (@hsnatsci.bsky.social) is looking for contributors to a February 2026 special section on "Historical Practices." More information in this Call for Proposals + in this thread. (1/?)
Surprise major archive find today - Paul Lazarsfeld apparently hired Theodor Adorno to write a 100pp qualitative analysis of quantitative participant interviews for something called the “Labor Project” in 1944, same year that “Dialectic of Enlightenment” was published. Yes, it’s interesting.
Thrilled to announce that the Call for Papers of "The Making of the Humanities XI" conference in Lund (9-11 October 2024) is open!
Deadline for submissions: May 1, 2024
Organized by the Board of Events of the Society for the History of the Humanities.
historyofhumanities.org/upcoming-mee...
CALL FOR PAPERS: How Sciences End Dates: 11–13 July 2025 Location: University of Oxford, UK Submission deadline: 31 January 2025 Conference Theme and Goals Historians have studied extensively how sciences begin—but how do they end? This is a crucial question for understanding how the labour of knowledge-making evolves. Previous attention to the founding, disciplining, and professionalisation of individual sciences has provided robust frameworks for thinking through the birth and growth of knowledge-making communities. Far less attention has been directed toward how those same communities decay, dissipate, or evolve beyond the contemporary boundaries of science. This conference seeks to cultivate case studies of the ends of sciences, and thereby to motivate a new approach to thinking about the developmental trajectories of scientific disciplines, communities, institutions, and the ordering of expert knowledge. A further aim is to strengthen the community of scholars with a shared interest in studying the ends of sciences. Submission Process Submissions should be sent to howsciencesend@gmail.com. Please title the email “SciEnds Abstract Submission” and include the following information in the body: - Full name as you would like it to appear on the programme - Email address - Affiliation, or how you would like to be identified on the programme - Presentation title - An abstract of no more than 250 words describing your proposed talk and how it fits the conference theme and goals. - An indication of whether you would like to be considered for travel support. (Limited funds are available to defray travel costs, with priority given to early career and insecurely employed scholars.) The submission deadline is 31 January 2025. We plan to circulate a draft program by the end of February 2025. Programme Committee Michelle Aroney (Oxford), Alex Aylward (Oxford), Joseph D. Martin (Durham)
CfP: How Sciences End
Oxford, 11-13 July 2025
Deadline: 31 January 2025
Submit 250-word abstracts to howsciencesend@gmail.com
[I'm broadcasting this on behalf of Joe Martin, Michelle Aroney & Alex Aylward, none of whom AFAIK are on this site yet]
We know, summer is a long way away. But we can't think of anything other than our upcoming BSHS conference. So, we wanted to share our excitement and remind you to submit your abstract for the 2025 BSHS conference in Cambridge, July 8-10 until Jan 10! https://buff.ly/3YWqCp6
Into the Unknown: France faces an uncertain future. tocqueville21.com/art-goldhamm...
Out now! @thorstenpeetz.bsky.social Our Routledge International Handbook of Valuation and Society has arrived! A big thank you to our fantastic colleagues who have contributed to this comprehensive compendium of research on valuation and evaluation in various societal spheres! lmy.de/ASSuq
THANK YOU ALL SO MUCH for sharing this terrific postdoc @jcblibrary.bsky.social! I'm testing your generosity here but would love to also share that we have TWO additional senior research fellowships for BROWN2026. Details at apply.interfolio.com/159128 and see number 2 below for terms... 1/
The French government has fallen. What does that mean, and why did it happen?
Some background and a short explainer 🧵
CfP: Predicting Europe. Histories of the Future in Post-1945 Europe
Deadline: 17 January
... your work, everyone who attended these talks, Oliver Lazarus for helping with logistics, and, as always, the Harvard University Asia Center for sponsoring the series! 🙏
See you in the spring! (lineup 👇)
scholar.harvard.edu/seow/STinAsia
2/2
#histstm #histsci #histtech #histmed #envhist 🧪
When Matt shared this, I didn’t at first fully understand how great a resource it is. When Hathi has full text he *links*to it — so this is in effect the beginning of a legal, open 20c corpus.
I didn’t know we had that.