Thoughts (mostly non-technical) from attending the FAST conference last week:
afterhoursacademic.com/fast-2026/
@rajatkateja
afterhoursacademic.com I like computer science, writing, traveling, dad jokes, audiobooks, optimizing/theorizing life, and trying to be a multi-sport athlete (running, tennis, table tennis, squash, strength training, muay thai, swimming, and counting...)
Thoughts (mostly non-technical) from attending the FAST conference last week:
afterhoursacademic.com/fast-2026/
Note to self: start the next presentation with "Hey everyone, I am super nervous to present..." funny + true + relatable
New blog post describing the basics of LSM trees afterhoursacademic.com/lsm-trees-in....
New blog post about learning how to put my ideas out for critique
afterhoursacademic.com/stupid-okay-...
New blog post about the different styles of parallelisms available/used for training neural networks
afterhoursacademic.com/parallelism-...
New blog post about the effective training time ratio of ML model training jobs
afterhoursacademic.com/ettr/
Great read!
I have strayed from the well-established path/ladder many times in favor of following my interests. It doesn't always work out, but it *always* leads to interesting experiences.
Of course, there is value in sticking though with things as well.
It's a balancing act!
New blog post covering the most prevalent technique and some new proposals for fast LLM checkpoint writes.
afterhoursacademic.com/llm-checkpoi...
I really appreciate and resonate with the anti-AI-use sentiment (refusing to use AI assistants to write emails/blogs/code) that I have been seeing recently.
Maybe I am just being old and refusing to learn new tech, but much of the new tech really feels useless...
people will make fun of ancient civilization for consulting oracles and cutting up livers to tell the future and then type βwhat is the meaning of life?β into ChatGPT
A employee-director or employee-founder relationship is somewhat similar. Yet, the gut feel check is not as prevalent. Instead, the project or work typically carries more weight.
Or maybe it was just me who was doing this wrong...
7/
The gut feel criteria is pretty widely known/accepted when it come to choosing a PhD advisor.
"Choose the advisor, not the project" is what I was told when starting my PhD.
Projects change over time and a good advisor-advisee relationship is a crucial for success.
5/
A casual hang out also provides a way to do a gut-check. These folks are key stakeholders in your trajectory at the company and hold immense power over you. Why join their team if you don't get a good feel about them.
4/
If the VP can only talk about work or thinks that they are the smartest person on the table, that's probably what it takes to succeed there, no matter what they say about work-life balance or growth mindset.
This is the "watch, not hear" equivalent of "show, not tell".
3/
The senior people are ones that have succeeded in that environment/company/culture. Chances are that succeeding in that place requires adopting a similar lifestyle.
2/
The "watch, not hear" corollary of "show, don't tell" when choosing a job.
I recently realized an underrated way to determine if a job is a good fit or not: hang out with senior folks in the team over a coffee/meal (principal engineers, VP, or even C-level folks depending on the company size)
1/
Vibe coding and prompt engineering sound like good ideas but are not.
Edgar Dijkstra's 1978 paper "On the foolishness of natural language programming" makes a great argument!