imminent critique:
shitlib (left-wing) -> <- libtard (right-wing)
|
v
shittard (enlightened centrist)
there needs to be a version of grok on this website that will shove agitprop down the throats of liberals with an equivalent smarmy millennial dialect
Marx's Capital, Vol. 1 is now complete! Congrats to the comrades who've been listening along with the posts. Here's a link to all 35.5 hours of it: www.youtube.com/playlist?lis...
#politics #economy #economics #history #capitalism #socialism #communism #marxism #capital #politicaleconomy #karlmarx
Americans trying to describe evil:
"so imagine a Muslim"
Who Gives A Fuck
to my loyal followers; some of you may have seen the recent change in my Bio. yes, it's true, I'm coming out as a marxist!
dym posting some readings related to this? the comparison is interesting and plausible
Since the current State must support capitalist interests, it cannot support worker's base interests; voting as "minimum requirement" compromises worker's base interests. The Bolsheviks used elections to spotlight this, driving workers to realize that their interests lie in the revolution.
You should watch that video, it'd surprise you. It talks about Voting as a system, not an action.
A vanguard party (Bolsheviks) uses elections when activism is limited, instead informing workers how the current State won't support their base interests (explained in Principles of Communism).
Isn't conceding that collective action is essential contradictory towards your belief that just voting is "a minimum requirement"? If collective action is necessary & possible, more than voting is possible. Even the Bolsheviks in Russia, who participated in State electioms, went beyond electoralism.
Those weren't gained thru just voting.
To elaborate, just voting (electoralism) can't provide gains because votes aren't powerful; interest groups are. Under our State, capitalist and managerial interest groups come first in the DNC and GOP, and they have the means to keep it that way cuz rich.
this blueskeet gon blow up
GOP = Groyper-Occupied Presidency
The Marxist position is that trying to achieve social change through only the electoral system is pointless, given it cannot provide gains for the working class. It is not abstract 'values' that Marxist aim for, but abolition of Capitalist exploitation in alignment with working class interests.
its true everything conservatives are scared about is actually based
banger blueskeet
"me, still trying to get Dementia"
In light of concern over ableism and homophobia, leftists are bringing back THIS gnostic slur to fight fascism!
LIEberals will coin words like 'RapethugliKKKan' without recognizing the DickSSiegKKKrats in the room .. curios!
i miss you
Had a historically accurate dream where Engels was giving a public lecture where he proceeded to glaze Marx for the entirety of the time I remembered being asleep
tyler robinson mugshot
As much as people on the left may feel that nothing of value was lost with Charlie Kirk, Marxism-Leninism denounces individual acts of adventurist terrorism in favor of mass, organized struggle, so this really wasn't our M.O. Shooting each other is very normal for fascists though, so this tracks π―
*DickSSiegKKKrats.
commission for @piebathbob.bsky.social , might do a few of these dm me for detail but thinking of doing some simple sketches for $55 USD a character (ignore the fact this one has two heads its still one character)
data wind chimes
i followed one (1) marxist account two days ago and now my feed is full of liberals instead of gay porn. help?
I'm curious if there's any relevant historical and/or contemporary works on whether organizing tenants would facilitate labor organization. Figure it'd be an important link for labor organizing similar to what I (barely) know about the Soviet system of organizing
I think I still have the file for this saved on my pc somewhere lol
Gender on my birth certificate: Vaccinated.
DEADMEAT VOL. #1 ISSUE #2
issue 2 starting on mspfa. mspfa.com?s=56572&p=272
