Now that I think about it— if the real underlying Republican strategy for the last decade or so has been to bring about Armageddon, it would explains a lot.
Now that I think about it— if the real underlying Republican strategy for the last decade or so has been to bring about Armageddon, it would explains a lot.
Per our Supreme Court the answer would depends on the giant inflatable penis’s political party.
If it’s a Republican penis, then the appropriate course is to allow it to disrupt tariff as its appeal goes up the chain.
If it’s a Democratic penis then immediate injunction.
Republicans believe that Congress’ constitutional power to declare war means that the President can do whatever he wants militarily as long as he doesn’t call it (i.e. declare) a war.
The long term threat that Iran’s missile program posed to the Trump Gaza Resort and Casino should not be underestimated.
Also another American job taken by an immigrant.
Israel and Saudi Arabia have a long history of wanting the US to fight there wars for them.
Step 1: Open negotiations
Step 2: Bomb
Step 3: ?
Because w/o the threat of nuclear Iran and as the strategic importance of oil declines, voters might start realizing there isn’t much of a strategic rationale for being so involved in the Middle East.
And what happens to Iran’s stockpiles of enriched uranium when the regime collapses?
Weird that people don’t see the national strategic importance of the new Trump ballroom.
I get why Zelenskyy has to pretend that the reason Trump supports Russia is that he doesn’t have all the facts.
Using the shadow docket the Republican Supreme Court gave Trump almost a year to make tariffs even remotely popular.
Trump failed.
Then the Supreme Court felt that they had no choice but to rule with every other court and find that the tariffs were blatantly unconstitutional.
Laser focused on affordability!
Seems to me that the simple solution for Canada is just to threaten to close the bridge owned by Trump’s donor.
Waiting for “coal dust is like a carbon filter for your lungs”
99% of criticism from the right is disingenuous, hypocritical, and reliant on dubious facts.
Unfortunately for this NY man $325K is short of the $1M Trump is charging for pardons
Of course, he said the same thing a few weeks ago.
Here’s hoping that he’s not lying this time.
That’s only because prior
Administrations weren’t willing to fudge the economic data
Also the delay gives Trump officials time to trade on insider information
Next step for Ring is to link your camera to the ICE facial recognition database
The good news is for CA and Phx is that they now know at least 2 police commissioners that need to be thrown out of office.
An enterprising lawyer should round up of few of 44k people affected and file a class action against the US Government for $440 Trillion (44K times $10B)
Will ICE be there?
Blue states might have to restructure their state national guard units into state militias to protect their citizens from the federal government.
6 GOP Senators is more than enough to force something to happen but I suspect the extent of their dissatisfaction is a press release.
The Republican philosophy is consistent if you realize what they believe is that “punching down is good, punching up is bad.”
In the Republican world White>Jew>Muslim.
Don’t worry, SCOTUS will restore lower court injunction authority if a Dem becomes President in ‘28
Answer should be no. Let Lindsey have to defend shutting down the government over this.
Legislators should not only do it anyway but put in some contingencies.
One comes to mind—No qualified immunity under
state law for masked agents.
This might also be unconstitutional (to the 6 Republicans on the Supreme Court).
State AG should be challenged to find other contingencies too.